Did Gavin Newsom Start A Dem Civil War? + The ActBlue Implosion

Hey everybody, today on the Charlie Kirk Show, Mark Halperin and Brooke Rollins joins the show as we talk about the Democrat Party in disarray, why are the price of eggs so high, and what is going on with ActBlue. ActBlue, the fundraising powerhouse of the Democrat Party, is in near collapse.
Email us as always, freedom at charliekirk.com, and subscribe to our podcast, that is the Charlie Kirk Show podcast page, and get involved with Turning Point USA at tpusa.com, that is tpusa.com. Buckle up everybody.
Here we go. Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus. I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the white house folks. I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy. His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.

We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country. That's why we are here.
noble gold investments is the official gold sponsor of the charlie kirk show

a company that specializes in gold iras and physical delivery of Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show,

a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
That is noblegoldinvestments.com. It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com. Breaking news, everybody.
Trump has canceled $400 million to Columbia University over rising anti-Semitism on campus. That is just the start.
For all these campuses that don't treat us well at Turning Point USA, you guys restrict freedom of speech, your funding might be cut soon. I learned so much about University of Pennsylvania.
Can you guys go back? I said the number on air because I remembered it because I had the dinner the day before. The amount of money these universities receive in overhead with grants is hundreds of millions.
I think it's like $130 million a year that University of Pennsylvania receives. For years, the Democrats have had a suspicious fundraising advantage.
For years, the Democrats have enjoyed a nonstop flow of money from an organization called ActBlue. Now, ActBlue operates as a fundraising powerhouse that is a pseudo payment processor.
So if you are a Democrat donor and you want to give money to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or to Gavin Newsom or to whomever, you have an ActBlue account. It remembers your payment information, very similar to Amazon.com.
So when you want to donate to one of these candidates, they make it stupid easy. You could donate to Kamala Harris or to any Democrat in two clicks or less.
One, two, boom, a hundred bucks. You don't have to input your credit card every time.
And they even make it with monthly contributions. They put it on autopilot.
Now, Republicans have an equivalent win red, but it just pales in comparison. However, there's something very weird happening at Act Blue.
James O'Keefe has done a lot of reporting to ActBlue and found that some of the addresses didn't always correlate with donors. There's a congressional investigation into ActBlue, and more and more people are calling into a criminal investigation.
Now, we have said many times here on this program that the cash advantage that Democrats have enjoyed via ActBlue is highly suspicious. Some people hypothesize, is this money coming from overseas? Is this money coming from Iran or China? We don't know, but we do know that ActBlue does not require the CCV numbers, the number on the back of a credit card, which is supposed to diminish fraud.
Without requiring a CCV number, it is a lot easier to be able to steal credit card information, put up fake credit cards, and pump a lot of money into the American political system. Well, right now, ActBlue is falling apart.
You've got to wonder why. ActBlue, the Democrat fundraising powerhouse, faces internal chaos, New York Times writes.
At least seven senior officials have left the group, setting off deep concerns about its future as it confronts scrutiny from congressional Republicans, and it won't just be congressional Republicans. If members of Congress end up sending criminal referrals to Kash Patel, I bet the FBI is going to go after them as well.
More than $16 billion has passed through Act Blue in 20 years. Let me say that again.
$16 billion has pumped through Democrat Act Blue in the last 20 years. We don't know where all this money is coming from, but now Act Blue is starting to close its doors, not officially, but they are collapsing from within.
There are so many nuggets of this article. I could do an entire hour-long show on this.
Quote, if Act Blue were to become severely diminished, Democrats running for offices at levels of all government could face setbacks significant in their efforts to raise cash. Candidates for offices ranging from school boards and city council to presidency rely on the platform for online fundraising, while Republicans have spent years trying to catch up.
We have not caught up on this game. The highest ranking legal official at ActBlue, as well as the assistant research director, the chief revenue officer and engineer who spent 16 years building and maintaining ActBlue's infrastructure have all left.
They said, quote, Zayin Ahmed, who is the last remaining lawyer in the ActBlue General Counsel's office, wrote an internal Slack message on February 26th that his access to his email and other internal platforms has been cut off and that other messages he posted in Slack have been deleted, according to screenshots obtained by the New York Times. Mr.
Ahmed is now on lean from ActBlue, according to a person briefed on the group's staffing. Quote, please be advised that we have an anti-retaliation whistleblower policies for a reason, Mr.
Ahmed wrote. Whoa.
Congressional investigations are only going to heat up. There might be criminal investigations to follow.

Is the Democrat ATM closing?

Is the easy money gravy train coming to an end?

If so, we could dominate the House and the Senate for a decade.

Not an exaggeration.

Hey, Charlie Kirk here. Ever see your dog slowing down or having health issues and wonder,

what can I do to make them better? Well, my friend friend add rough greens to your dog's food for 90 days and you'll see changes that will amaze you guaranteed invented by naturopathic dr dennis black rough greens wants to invite you and give your pup the rough greens 90 day challenge in the first 30 days you'll see shinier coats and increased energy. By day 60, your dog will have a stronger immune system, less shedding, and improved joint function, all due to live nutrients you've added to their diet.
And at 90 days, better digestion, reduced inflammation, improved heart health, and you might even have reduced their cancer risk. Fetch a free jumpstart trial bag for your dog today.
Go to ruffgreens.com. Just use promo code Charlie.
That is ruffgreens.com, promo code Charlie, and just cover shipping. You don't have to change your dog's food.
To improve your dog's health, just add a scoop of ruffgreens. That is ruffgreens.com.
We're going to dive right into it with guests today. We have a rapid moving show today here on the Charlie Kirk Show as we led a lot of the news cycle yesterday.
Joining us now is a great guest, Mark Halperin. I love getting the emails from Mark Halperin every single morning.
I think it's the wild world of politics. I think I got that right.
But I love it because the subject lines always catch my attention. They always catch my eyeballs.
Mark, great to see you. Good to see you, sir.
It's Wide World of News. You were very close.
I was close. Okay.
Mark Halperin's Wide World of News, a two-way TV. Mark, welcome.
And your reaction to the Gavin Newsom comment on my appearance on his podcast? I have so many thoughts about it. I'll tell you my two top ones.
First of all, you would think if someone found themselves for the first time in their adult life in a room with someone more handsome than them, they might, it might lead to humility, but instead it's like your producers creating like a little shrine to you about your appearance. So I'm a little, I'm a little surprised.
Had you been in the room with Gavin Newsom before? Was that the first time? No, I, that was the first time I first time i ever met him yeah so again you're two of the three most handsome men i know and so for me it's just eye candy to the extent i listened um i thought i thought it was super interesting i'm really glad you two did that uh you're both fans of two-way although neither of you have come on yet that's my other big thought um but but i i have great respect for both of you. I think that you're not underrated, at least not anymore.
He's still underrated. I'm not sure he'll run for president.
I'm not sure if he ran, he'll win. But I think he's a very thoughtful guy.
He's not as liberal as people think. And you saw that in the big news he made with you on trends and sports.
And he's better with people than he's giving credit for. He's had some troubles governing his state in part because the legislature is so liberal.
But I think for me, you two sitting down and doing that is great. And I think in general, I've listened to, I haven't finished it.
I've listened to about two thirds of it. I think it's a great conversation.
And I think you two talked about things in a way that was good. In other words, like you weren't it was very much in the spirit of what I tried to do.
You just communicated with each other. You didn't come trying to score points.
And obviously he ceded a lot of ground to you on the 2024 election and particularly on this issue of trans athletes and women's sports. What what do you make? Let's just posit that he probably is running for president.
I think he is. I think he's incredibly ambitious.
About the shift on the trans issue and the pushback and the blowback that he's receiving for kind of pivoting on the trans issue. I actually don't think it's genuine because he has actions he could take.
But even the statement of that is a divergence from the current Democrat Party orthodoxy. I like the way you framed it.
Look, let's see if he takes any action. It is the case that sometimes political figures, elected officials, have positions and they don't act them, right? You've had pro-life presidents who didn't do very much to try to overturn Roe or to try to change the law in a way that would protect more life.
So that's one example. I could give you many.
Look, this is a guy who was for same-sex marriage publicly before Nancy Pelosi was, before the Clintons were, before Barack Obama was, which you could say means he's more left-wing than them. Or you could say he is willing sometimes to take positions that are a little

bit risky. That position's popular now, but it wasn't back then.
I think that every Democrat

has to ask themselves two questions if they disagree with Governor Newsom, and many people

criticize him. One is, do you want your party to be on the wrong side of an issue, 70-30, 80-20?

And if you truly believe that you want to take the position that's the minority, go out and defend it. Don't try to, as most Democrats are doing today, try to obscure the issue and say, well, it should be up to local officials.
There's a clear demarcation here. And I think whether you think he switched for cynical purposes or not, I think he explained himself pretty well.
And I don't think it's obvious that he's taking – I don't think it's – I think whether you think he switched for cynical purposes or not, I think he explained himself pretty well.

And I don't think it's I don't think it's obvious that he's I don't think it's I think I would take him at his word that this is what he thinks. But as you said, if that's really what he thinks, there's some actions that have to come with it following through.
But if he does want to run for president, and again, I'm not as sure as you that he does, he does want to run for president. That kind of thing is going to put him in a category that very few Democrats today are willing to be in, which is stand up to the base of the party with principle and emotion.
And some would say it might be the beginning of a sister soldier moment, which you might remember was Bill Clinton running for the presidency in 1992. I was actually before I was born.
Yeah, it was before you were born that I was in the room for it. So well, educate the audience on this, though.
What was the context? Why is that an important reference point? Yeah, I use it all the time that phrase because I covered the clean campaign and I was there for that. Sister Soldier was a rap artist who had lyrics that were very violent about, I think, killing police.
It was at least about violence against police. And he went and spoke to Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition event.
Sister Solja had spoken earlier at the same event. And he said, you had a rap singer here named Sister Solja.
I disagree with her. Seemed, today, that seems maybe a little quaint.
But back then, when Bill Clinton's Democratic Party was not as far left as it is today, but it was too far left to win presidential elections, standing up to the base of the party was seen as very difficult. Now, and few were willing to risk doing it.
Bill Clinton's whole campaign was about sister soldier moments. He came out for NAFTA, which back then was out of step with the Democratic Party, the trade deal.
He came out for the death penalty. He came out for right to work laws, against right to work laws, for right to work laws.
He came out for welfare reform. All of these things were seen as part of a very self-conscious and purposeful effort to say things that would put him at odds with the liberal wing of the party, to say to more moderate voters, including independents and Republicans, but also to Democrats who wanted to win, I will stand up to the base of the party.
Now, when you say Gavin Newsom might have said what he said with you purely for cynical political purposes, I think Bill Clinton believed all those positions. So it had the added advantage of being what he believed, and it's easier to sell that to the public if it's a legit position.
But I think Gavin Newsom is someone who has in the past not gotten enough credit for criticizing some of the more liberal policies of the party. And this is of a piece with that.
And again, when the left squeals, which they have, and I think it's been more muted than it might have been, you got to follow through with it.. If you want to make the political points stick and sustain, you've got to stick to your guns.
You've got to look for opportunities to do it. But you also have to do, if you want to win the Democratic nomination, you also have to do what Bill Clinton did.
Bill Clinton said, I would say, I'm a Democrat by birth, heritage, and inclination. And that's the only way to get the Democratic nomination, because it's still dominated by the liberal wing of the party.
Drag them to the center on some issues, but convince them that you're one of them. And I think Gavin Newsom is one of the few Democrats with the skill to do that.
So does it say something more broader about our politics, that the attitude is going to the center right, that Democrats are going to have to concede on some of the more unpopular issues? Is it Gavin Newsom that is seeing the trend and he wants to be a little ahead of it? What does that say more broadly about where the direction, the momentum of how people view political matters goes right now? Well, I think the party is split. And again, the Democratic Party is farther left than it's been in my lifetime or yours.

And so the the the power of the left and the distance someone who wants to push the party or pull the party back to the center is farther than it's ever been. I know plenty of Democrats, including people who are in the Bernie Sanders wing of the party, like Congressman Ro Khanna of California, who say, of course, we have to talk to the whole country and not be in our narrow and confined blue bubble.
But again, it's hard to predict how this will go, because standing up to the base is a problem. And you saw that on Tuesday, where Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer refused to stand up to the base of their party, and they had a massive calamity.
If they weren't protected by the media, what they did would still be a dominant story. It's not today.
There's a lot of other news. But I think it's up in the air now, whether there'll be Democrats like Newsom who helped to pull the party back towards the center, or they'll be too afraid like the congressional leaders seem to be right now.
Just to make sure we're clear, you're talking about the outburst at the State of the Union, correct? Is that what we're speaking about? Yeah, I'm sorry. I should have been more clear.
I assume you've been talking about it all week. Yeah.
I mean, the outburst of the State of the Union, but also the whole series of events around it where the party simply cannot talk about issues in a sustained way that are popular. They're discombobulated by Donald Trump and the whole Trump team, including you, extraordinarily skillful at keeping them discombobulated.
They went into that with one goal. Their one goal was, we want to talk about the real lives of real people that are being impacted by Trump policies.
And instead, they engaged in conduct. I'm particularly hung up on the failure to cheer for that little boy, for DJ.
It's just unbelievable. It's not human.
It's not human. But they went in and they exhibited conduct that is so disqualifying for so many people.
Now, can they come back from it? Have they done things that are also in peace with that? Of course. Of course.
Of course. But the symbolism of the inability of the leadership to get them to do a simple plan does not speak well of the party.
Of course they can come back. I mean, after January 6th, everyone thought we were done and we dug ourselves out.
I mean, so of course they can come back. If you are a private student loan debt borrower, listen carefully.
Great patriots here. Private student loan debt in the U.S.
totals about $300 billion. About $45 billion of that is labeled as distressed.

YReFi refinances distressed or defaulted private student loans that others will not touch.

YReFi does not care at all about what your credit score is.

If your private student loan debt is keeping you up at night and ruining your life, you

guys should check out YReFi.com.

That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com.

YReFi.com. So check it out right now.
YREFI.com. Do you have a co-borrower? YREFI can get them released from the loan.
You can give your mom or dad a break. You can even skip a payment every six months up to 12 times.
It may not be available in all states. Go to YREFI.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y dot com. That is YREFI.com.
So check it out right now. YREFI.com.
You don't have to ignore the mountain of student loan statements on your kitchen table anymore. Go to YRefy.com.
That is Y-R-E-F-Y.com. So, Mark, I want to get your reaction to Hakeem Jeffries kind of being a little frozen when he was asked yesterday about the Gavin Newsom situation.
Now, what's interesting to me is that Gavin's team seemed to not give a little memo or a heads up to Democrat leadership that this was coming. And I think that's important.
There wasn't someone working the phones. Hey, Hakeem, just want to let you know it's going to make national headlines.
It was as if Gavin said it. Because understand, this was not a live interview.
They had a 36-hour lead a 36 hour lead time and with a 36 hour lead time they very well could have been a good party man like a good company man picked up the phones worked it and they would have a little workshop thing and all the tensions would have gone instead he kind of played into the ambush let's play this piece of tape here play 224 i want to want to ask about California Governor Gavin Newsom's comments saying that Democrats were in the wrong for allowing transgender athletes to compete in female and girls sports. What is your response to that after Democrats had opposed the women and girls in sports? I haven't seen his comments.
What Democrats opposed was unleashing sexual predators on girls throughout the United States of America. OK, it's a completely unrelated.
I have no idea what that means. I mean, sorry, Mark, react.
Yeah. I mean, first of all, every time I see the guy on TV now, he looks exhausted.
For those of you who are just listening to the audio, Hakeem Jeffries just needs a nap or a vacation. And that means, I believe, it's a manifestation of how much pressure he's under.
I hear from Democrats in Congress regularly, and I spent a lot of time on the Hill this week around the president's speech. He is not able to grapple with the liberal wing of the party.
And so what you have is a guy who knows his party's on the wrong side of a lot of issues, including the one that Governor Newsom made news on. He is he is unable to stand up to that wing of the party because when he tries, they threaten to revolt there.
It's where the energy is in the party.. And they've not found a way to stand up to him.
Governor Newsom could have given them a heads up. He's not particularly close to a lot of Democrats.
A lot of Democrats don't like him, and he doesn't make time for that. And that happens sometimes with big state governors, particularly in California, because it's 3,000 miles from Washington.
But I believe that if Gavin Newsom runs for president, he's not going to run as part of the Washington club, right? He's going to run as an outsider. That's in vogue right now, of course.
And so he didn't want to give him a heads up. He wants to operate here on his own plane.
And I'll say again, that reaction, that Brooklyn brand of word salad from Hakeem Jeffries is a manifestation of the fact that the party is a mess right now, not just on the issue of trans athletes and women's sports and girls' sports, but on the general question of how do they grapple with Donald Trump, who, contrary to what the press says, is largely talking about issues that are 70 or 80 percent popular, as opposed to 20 or 30 percent not popular. And they don't just they haven't grappled with that because the rational thing would be to hold some sister soldiers and say, you know what, we're with America.
But they just want to, as he did there, change the subject or in some cases defend the unpopular position, which, you know, hats off to them for being principled. But party can only last so long if they're on the wrong side of 70, 30, and 80, 20 issues.
Yeah, or just say a completely unrelated statement. I mean, I don't think anyone is pushing sexual predators on girls.
I just, it's like an, it's a completely unrelated statement. Mark, I'm going to go back to a op-ed written by James Carville.
And I know this came up in my Gavin Newsom discussion, where he basically argued that Democrats should do a strategic retreat or rollover and play dead. He argued that the Democrats' best move right now is allow Trump's numbers to get soft and this whole thing's going to fall apart.
And then we will strike. What do you make of that? This is the New York Times piece right here.
James Carville, it's time for a daring political maneuver. Nothing that we can do, play possum and allow it to kind of pass over.
What is your take on this? Has this ever worked in recent American modern politics? Is this a playbook that has been proven to work? It works in possum politics, but this is about human beings. Look, I think James is trying to make a virtue out of three things, which right now are big problems for the party.
One is President Trump continues to be an 800-pound gorilla moving 800 miles per hour. Number two, Democrats don't have any leaders who have the communication skills to stand up to him.
And number three, they don't have anything like what your party has, which is issue positions that you can sell through a machinery that's cranking fast involving communications and interest groups and real human beings, as we saw at the State of the Union-like speech. So I think what James is basically saying is we need to do nothing now because anything we do will make it worse.
See Tuesday night. But eventually, when he thinks the time to stop playing possum comes, you'll still need those same three things.
You'll still need leaders and ideas and messaging capacity. And Donald Trump hopefully has made some errors.
That's the thing that could change that they don't have to control, but it's not definitely going to change. So I've heard lots of smart Democrats say James is just saying that because he wants to have something to say.
And the alternative is to say, yeah, Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin should be going head to head with Donald Trump right now when the party is divided and without any popular issue positions that they know how to sell. So the the state of the Republican Party seems as if we have, you know, plenty of momentum moving forward.
Any of the fault lines seem to be smooth over. And there is large unity behind the president and administration.
Just looking at Doge, some of the reports yesterday saying that, you know, there might be a tighter leash on some of the activities there. What is your analysis of the state of how this administration is operating six weeks in? Super successful getting a lot done.
It's unprecedented. You and I have talked about it.
We've never had a second term president like this. All the energy and creativity and more planning than we've had in a normal second to first term president or second term president, but much more experienced than a first term president.
So it's a combination that is working very well. They're getting a lot done.
I think there's three big areas of danger. One is dealing with the Congress on the big stuff that has to get done.
Republican-only votes required for the reconciliation packages on taxes and spending and immigration and military stuff. That has to get done, and they basically can't lose any Republican votes.
At the same time, with Congress, they have to get Democratic votes on some issues. So figuring out how to pass, avoid a government shutdown, raise the debt ceiling, pass the president's domestic agenda.
That's one. Two is DOGE, which which is great and popular if you describe it as cutting waste, fraud and abuse.
But as we saw this week, members of Congress, Republican members of Congress, members of the cabinet, they just they say we don't work for Elon Musk and we don't want to cut veterans. We don't want to cut hospitals in our district.
We don't want to cut research in our district.

And so figuring out Elon's role and figuring out how to cut without really pissing off not just voters, but a lot of Republicans and veterans.

That's a second third second issue. And then third is the president's unprecedented at this stage of an administration playing big casino overseas, big casino in the Middle East, big casino with Ukraine, Russia.
And maybe he'll succeed. And certainly I don't think you can argue that this is worse than what Biden was doing, which was basically nothing, just maintaining the status quo.
But he's taken a lot of big risks. He strikes a deal with Russia and then there's Russian tanks on the Champs-Élysées, or he does the deal with Gaza and something worse takes over.
So those are big risks. I'm not saying he shouldn't be pursuing these three tracks by any means.
Those are things he ran on. But I think those are the big areas of just littered with landmines and complications.
And there are some Trump allies, including at least one friend of yours that I know, who say maybe this is too much. From a communications point of view, a bandwidth point of view, a presidential focus point of view, maybe there's just too many big projects and some of them should go on the back burner for now.
Mark, please plug Two Way and also your newsletter, which I read every morning. Really quick 20 seconds.
Okay, so two-way.tv, you can go on and watch our programs and there's some in the morning,

some at night. It's different, long, sophisticated conversations, two-way

participation from the community. The newsletter is very expensive.
Not everyone who listens to

the show will want it. Go to walkingduck.com slash Mark, and you can read about my premium

product called Concierge Coverage. Mark, thank you so much.
If pain is affecting your life, make 2025 the year of feeling good again, the year of moving better, sleeping better, feeling more alive and do it with Relief Factor. Relief Factor is a daily supplement that fights pain naturally.
It doesn't just mask pain temporarily, helps reduce or even eliminate it. Over a million people have turned to Relief Factor.
Feel the difference it can make in your life. Give their three-week quick start a try.
It's only $19.95, less than a dollar a day. It just takes a phone call.
Call 1-800-4-RELIEF. That is 1-800-4-RELIEF.
Remember, every day you feel better is a day you live better. So wherever you're hurting, back, neck, joints, or muscles, make 2025 the year of feeling good again.
Try Relief Factor right now. That is 1-800-4-RELIEF, 1-800-4-RELIEF.
Joining us now is a old friend, a great friend, an amazing patriot, and a congratulations is in order to the Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins. So good to see you, Brooke.
And it's amazing to see you in the cabinet for President Trump. Congratulations.
Oh, Charlie Kirk. I mean, really, what a joy on so many levels.
I know we have gotten to talk quite a bit off of the camera and off of your show, but this is the first time I've been back on the show and I'm just so grateful to do it. But thank you so much.
It's the honor of a lifetime. So there's a lot of attention right now on the Department of Agriculture and kind of the mess that Joe Biden left you.
The thing that is a talking point of the Democrats and to be fair, a reality a lot of Americans are experiencing is the price of eggs. Separate fact from fiction.
Why is it that egg prices have gone up so dramatically? And what is the plan to bring those prices down? Well, it's funny, you know, all of the talk in Washington and certainly the amazing State of the Union, which was unbelievable. I'm sure you've spent a lot of time on your show talking about it.
Oh, yeah. And it's what's happening with Ukraine, what's happening with America across the world, what's happening at the border.
I mean, what's really happening across all of government with Elon and Doge has just been astounding. It's another revolution.
But at the end of the day, if the single mom who lives in Detroit, Michigan, can't go to the grocery store and afford a carton of eggs, then the world's not right, right? I mean, it's that sort of pocketbook issue. And as we, Charlie, you and I have long battled together to take the American dream to every corner of our country, these are really, real significant issues.
I don't have my chart here with me, but if I did, and by the way, President Trump loves this chart, but it shows that for 40 years, the price of eggs was pretty static. It was right around $1.52 a dozen.
Then under Obama, it went up, not surprisingly, because of over-regulation and higher taxes, et cetera. The cost of input went up, but not significantly, maybe from $1.52 to $2.53.
Then under Trump, without

anything intentional, but just because less government, lower regulations, everyone did better, the prices went back down. But then under Biden, they skyrocketed 230% higher than what they were under Trump one.
And there's reasons for that, over-regulation, et cetera. But the avian bird flu, which is a virus that these chickens have gotten, is a huge reason.
The Biden team basically depopulated about 150 million egg-laying hens last year, which is the protocol. We're looking at the protocol now to see how to tweak it so that hopefully we don't have to do that moving forward.
But we did. We rolled out a five-point plan a week ago.
Includes deregulation, includes repopulation much more quickly, includes importing eggs from other countries for the short term. And then for the long term, figuring out how to solve for these viruses that are basically annihilating a significant pop, significant populations in our poultry industry.
And so I don't oversimplify it, but a bunch of chickens were killed, like 100 million, and therefore it restricts the supply and the demand stays the same. And so the price goes up.
Is that somewhat of a fair summation? That's exactly right. Now, alongside the Biden, crazy inflation, crazy overregulation, crazy spending, right? I mean, the bird flu has certainly been a massive driver in that, but it isn't just that.
And, you know, as much as we would love to get the price of eggs down to $2 by tomorrow, although I think we're making some good strides, I've seen some recent numbers, this is going to take a little while. It's going to take a little while to figure out how to solve for the flu.
It's going to take a little while to get the deregulation, such as Prop 12 in California and line speeds and other things back to normal before they were in Trump one. And frankly, just bring the cost of goods down across the country.
But we're making incredible strides. I'm so proud of this president.
He has just been such a, I mean, we all know this, right? Such a warrior for everything that we care about. And my role now becomes, you know, the farmers, the ranchers, the ag community, bringing prosperity back to rural America and getting the price of those eggs down.
That's what, that's at least what he's told me. So, so speaking more broadly, educate our audience about the duties and the responsibilities, all about what the department of agriculture does.
People just think of it as, you know, kind of corn or soybeans. It's a lot more than that.
Kind of give us a little insight into your portfolio. Well, it is.
And when I got the call on November 23rd from President Trump, it was a Saturday before Thanksgiving. My husband and my four kids and I were driving to Auburn, Alabama for the Texas A&M Auburn football game and very unexpectedly had a conversation that, I mean, really kind of changed everything.
Although I will eventually go back and join you, Charlie, out in the trenches doing the great work outside. I mean, yeah, that's where my heart is.
But it really is. It's a privilege.
It's a blessing. But it's a big job.
I mean, people assume to your point, it's corn and soybeans and some beef, but it is a it really is it's a privilege it's a blessing but it's a big job i mean people assume to your point it's corn and soybeans and some beef but it's also the food stamp program which is a massive bureaucratic nightmare of a beast where we're not even really getting the food to the people who really need it most and when we are it includes cokes and candy and all kinds of stuff. So there's massive amount of work that we need to do there.
It also includes the Forest Service. So we've got the largest firefighting unit anywhere in the country of any size of government is the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
We've got almost 30,000 firefighters in our community. So yesterday I was in North Carolina.
They've got some fires that have popped up that are a little bit scary, looking at the damage of Hurricane Helene, but also understanding what we need to do and the resources that are necessary to ensure we don't have another fire like what happened in California, that all the different components are working well together. You name it.
I think USDA, you know, it was the first agency, the first cabinet position created after the founding of the country. So, right, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson created defense and state and attorney general, et cetera.
They waited, what, almost 100 years. And then Abraham Lincoln created the Department of Agriculture.
And I think, and then it was a little while longer before the other ones came along. And so I think it became a little bit of the dumping ground for

all the things that didn't have a place in a federal agency. But that's part of the great

role. And I welcome it and I thrive with it.
How do we realign the United States Department

of Agriculture? How do we set a model for not just the federal government, but around the country on

how you realign, how you reduce in force, how you become more effective and more efficient with much

Thank you. How do we set a model for not just the federal government, but around the country on how you realign, how you reduce in force, how you become more effective and more efficient with much less money? And that's what we and our very small team right now, we're still trying to get people in the door, but that's what we're doing every day.
So let's also talk about tariffs. And I know there's a lot of back and forth on this.
And by the way, the American people voted for tariffs and they want tariffs. My phone was lighting up like a Christmas tree.
I'm sure yours was from farmers and ranchers and people that are great folks. You know, hey, what's going on? Are we able to sell our product? We're able to import our product.
How are you guys thinking about this at the Department of Agriculture? Well, there's no doubt. You know, I've been now to six or seven different states.
I've only been in for about two and a half weeks, I guess three weeks, and been to, gosh, a bunch of states, talked to a bunch of farmers, almost 200, I think, from around the country, had a lot of them come to Washington. It's really important to me that I get outside the noise of Washington and outside the kind of the, you know, the associations, et cetera, not that they don't play a very good role, but I want to talk to the farmers directly.
And in so doing, the number one issue for them is the uncertainty that tariffs and the trade, potential trade renegotiations, what that means for our ag community. And listen, Charlie, in a hundred years, I'm not sure that the ag community that our farmers and ranchers have been operating at more of a razor thin margin than they are today.
I. I mean, it is not a good place to be.
Our exports, we have a trade deficit of $49 billion in ag, thanks to Joe Biden. It was zero when we left President Trump's first term.
That is real money taken out of the pockets of our farmers. But the number one thing they're concerned about is trade.
And so yesterday, the president, whom I have been, and he, these are his people, right? We are his people. And he knows that the rural communities and the ag communities have been with him since the moment he came down that escalator.
It took other people a lot longer to get on board. In early 21, when others were running for the hills and not supporting President Trump, this community was, and he knows that.
So he mentioned the State of the Union a few times on Tuesday night, farmers, I'm with you. I love you.
Yesterday, I talked to them multiples of times as they were finalizing at least the 30-day deal to exempt ag products under USMCA going to Canada or Mexico, which is a huge relief, even if short term. They exempted fertilizer, also called potash, from Canada under a different kind of line.
But at the end of the day, the president is hyper focused on delivering for the American people. He was elected on tariffs being part of that toolkit in order to bring prosperity back to America.
But I am so confident that he is also an everyday thinking about the real world effects on the backbone of this country and in rural America, which are our farmers. So, so critically important.
Secretary Rollins, it's nice to say that. Anything else that you, on your kind of front vision, things you're dealing with, you want our audience to be aware of, and what are your asks out of Congress with this big budget bill? What are some needs that you see, waste to cut, elimination, you know, doge up the food stamps where you're going to be going to Congress and say, hey, here are my big asks.
So at the end of the day, I think what's really important and I'm assuming most of the people watching you today, Charlie, and are fans of yours probably also watch the president on Tuesday night. This isn't easy, right?

Revolution is never easy. And there are really hard decisions to be made.
And there are days that,

my goodness, you know, the concept of how you get this massive beast of the federal government that

has gotten too big under both the Democrats and Republicans, right? Democrats and Republicans. How do you take it back to where it is meant to be? How do you return the power to the people? How do you implement our founders' vision of self-governance when things have just gotten so out of control in Washington? And while, Charlie, you and I are both very much pathological optimists, I don't even know that you or I could have imagined the world that we're in right now in the best way, right? We've got Elon Musk, who is just doing such a phenomenal job.
We have a cabinet. We're like family and we're all working together.
We've all now known each other and worked together for years at this point. So it isn't like we're in our silos anymore.
This is a team effort to save America. So as I'm going to the Hill, and part of my message has been, Charlie, when you're in a revolution and you are significantly reducing the size of government, nothing will be perfect.
It will be imperfect. There will be mistakes made, but this sort of shaking up the whole system and almost restarting it in a way, there's not going to be another opportunity, I believe, perhaps in our lifetimes to do exactly what we're doing now.
So even as I'm talking to our friends on the Hill, but even this morning, I talked to a Democrat senator, and I won't say who it was, but we had a very collegial conversation about what our goals are, what we're trying to do at USDA, the importance of returning, you know, and realigning the agency. And for the most part, even those on the other side of the aisle understand that President Trump won with a mandate and winning a popular vote and winning all the swing states.
And that's now what we're working to effectuate. So I have gotten nothing but mostly general positive feedback, even from those on the other side who understand what it is we're trying to do.

And for the most part, doing it with the best, well, for our sake, we are doing it with the best of intentions.

But even those on the other side, I think for the most part, recognize that while they are not in power,

they may not make these decisions, but they realize this is what the American people have asked for.

Brooke, you're the greatest. Secretary Rollins, I should say, with all due respect.

No, Brooke. Brooke, forever.

You're the greatest. Thank you, Charlie.
Thank you. Thanks so much for listening,

everybody. Email us, as always, freedom at charliekirk.com.
Thanks so much for listening,

and God bless. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.com.