Best of the Program | Guests: Mike Rowe & Gov. Mike Dunleavy | 3/12/24

44m
Global Health Project co-founder and president Dr. Kat Lindley joins to discuss the terrifying moves the WHO is making that threaten America’s sovereignty. Governor Mike Dunleavy (R-Alaska) joins to blast President Biden for the "economic warfare" being put on Alaska, as the state has received more sanctions than foreign countries. Executive producer and host of "Dirty Jobs" Mike Rowe joins to discuss the attack on small businesses and gig workers such as truck drivers.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Listen and follow along

Transcript

This podcast is supported by Progressive, a leader in RV Insurance.

RVs are for sharing adventures with family, friends, and even your pets.

So, if you bring your cats and dogs along for the ride, you'll want Progressive RV Insurance.

They protect your cats and dogs like family by offering up to $1,000 in optional coverage for vet bills in case of an RV accident, making it a great companion for the responsible pet owner who loves to travel.

See Progressive's other benefits and more when you quote RV Insurance at progressive.com today.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates, pet injuries, and additional coverage and subject to policy terms.

Mike Rowe is on the show today with a lot to say about piles of dead bodies and piles of crap.

You'll understand when you get there.

Also, we talk to the governor of Alaska, who has

more,

what did he call them, restrictions or sanctions on him from this administration than

this administration has put on Iran.

And he tells a story of Alaska pretty much disappearing.

You

don't want to miss that.

And we talked to Dr.

Kat Lindley.

She is an expert on what the WHO is doing.

We're running out of time to make sure that the WHO does not usurp our sovereignty with these new treaties.

They're definitely not calling it a treaty because then it would have to be voted on in the Senate.

New restrictions and guidelines for America.

You find all of that and so much more on today's podcast.

First, pre-born is not easy to face.

This country has blood on its hands.

Nearly 65 million innocent lives have taken in abortion, murder since Roe versus Wade.

Now that Roe is gone, there's still a lot of work to do because we can't erase the terrible history we've built with our unborn children in this country.

but we can at least change the future a little bit and they've upped their game because now abortion clinics are your daughter's bathroom, the house.

It's horrible what's going on.

The Ministry of Pre-Born is working on this every day by introducing an expecting mom to her unborn baby through a free ultrasound.

Pre-born doubles the chances that she, the mom, will choose life.

They've rescued over 280,000 babies through love, compassion, and free ultrasounds.

Every day they rescue about 200 more.

Please, they need your help.

One life-saving ultrasound is $28, just $28, and you could save the life of a mom and a baby.

To donate securely, dial pound250, say the keyword baby.

That's pound250, keyword baby, or donate securely at preborn.com/slash back.

Preborn.com/slash Beck, sponsored by Preborn.

You're listening to

the best of the blend back program.

Dr.

Kat

Lindley.

She is a family physician and a global health project co-founder and president, and she is the director of globalcovidsummit.org.

Doctor, welcome to the program.

Thank you for having me today.

You bet.

So

tell people, most people don't know anything about this.

What is the WHO doing?

So exactly as you said, they came together in 21 and decided that we need better protection from future pandemics because that's what they feel that we

are going to have this perpetual state of

emergent pathogens and new pandemics.

What they're trying to do is negotiate at the same time two documents.

One is the treaty that they are calling an agreement currently because they're trying a way

to get away from calling it a treaty since treaties have to be ratified in our Senate.

So this is one document.

The other one is amendments to international health regulation.

They really need to be looked at together because exactly as you said, if they are passed in May of this year by the World Health Assembly in Geneva, it will give powers to Director General in an event of public health emergency to decide that the area needs to be closed, the borders can be closed.

They can issue quarantine, isolation.

they can dictate to the member states what type of therapeutics we use, diagnostics, vaccines.

There is a huge push for more censorship of voices that don't feel the same as the World Health Organization.

There is this war on infodemics.

There is going to be a sharing of intellectual properties, more push for EUAs.

to approve new products.

And all in all, when you really look at the documents and read both of them, you really understand that this is an attack on the U.S.

Constitution, specifically First Amendment, Fourth, Tenth, and Fourteenth Amendment.

Okay, good, but only those.

Only those.

That's good.

People will say, oh, this is a conspiracy.

They're not trying to take it away.

They're just trying to help.

They're just trying to help.

Well, yes, that's actually the big push that

Director General Tedros always says.

For the future generations, we must pass this pandemic agreement because we need to protect them.

And if we don't, we are failing at our jobs.

In reality, you have to see that the World Health Organization is trying to position themselves to become this global health authority.

There is also something in the Article five of the pandemic agreement called One Health.

And One Health essentially says that the lives of humans are not more important than animal plants, and everything is intertwined with the climate change.

So with this One Health agenda, the World Health Organization would essentially have

power over

the full aspect of life on Earth.

That's fantastic.

Is the World Health Organization still in bed with the Chinese, or is that something that

can change from time to time just based on the, I don't know, the appointments of the people?

Or is this still an arm of the Chinese?

Very much so.

TENROS was actually a position with the support from China and specifically the United Nations.

As you're well aware,

World Health Organization is subsidiary of United Nations.

And there is actually, it's interesting interesting to watch both of these organizations at the same time because UN is pushing for global governance and they are pushing for this CBDC, the central bank digital currency.

If you combine that with the World Health Organization push for vaccine digital passport that they have adopted from European Union, you can really see this

possibility of reaching social credit score system that they already have in China.

These are not conspiracy theories.

You just have to read their documents.

So lay it all there.

Yeah, they are you getting any attention at all from the mainstream media?

No, mainstream media really likes this pandemic agreement.

Luckily, we are getting some support from legislators on federal level and specifically on state level.

I feel that

I I listen to you all the time, so I know you're well aware of our of political landscape.

On federal level, we will have a difficult time because the Biden administration is the one pushing for most of these amendments,

and they are very much in favor of the pandemic agreement.

But on state level, we can actually protect ourselves because of the Tenth Amendment.

And in New Hampshire, I testified in February on a bill HB 1156

that would not allow any jurisdiction to the World Health Organization on state level, on

county levels, and things like that.

So they are going for a full vote on the floor this Thursday.

And we need all hands on deck.

We need everyone in New Hampshire to call their representatives because it made it out of the committee split, right?

Democrats were against this bill, and Republicans obviously understand the danger.

So we need people to call their representatives and push for this bill to be passed.

And that is in New Hampshire.

And when is that

decision that votes?

Thursday.

And bill is HB 1156.

1156.

Okay.

We'll put some notices out.

If you're in New Hampshire, please call.

This happens Thursday.

And

the 10th Amendment is the amendment that says anything that's not enumerated in the Constitution as a federal power, All of that goes back

first to the states and the people.

And

if it's not spelled out in the Constitution, then

they have no jurisdiction.

The state

can make the rules on that.

And so you're trying to use the 10th Amendment saying that there's nothing in the Constitution that says what exactly.

What are they claiming is their power?

The health care, the police power, when it comes to the health care of the citizen of the state, go to the federal, I mean, to the state level.

Federal

level has no jurisdiction over the health care of the citizen.

So this is why it's important to actually push for this to protect the states

so that the World Health Organization, if they decide we need future lockdowns, new vaccines, quarantine, things like that, the state agencies do not have to comply, and they should not comply.

How different would COVID have been if this were in play?

Not only that, how different the COVID would have been if the physicians were allowed to do what we know best to do.

Correct.

You know, early treatment, us really coming in first line and taking care of the people and then speaking with our agencies, and our agencies listening to us.

I would say the only good good thing that happened during COVID era is that we realized that our govern I know you know this, but most people didn't realize that our government is not really working for us and that there are too many strings attached with many of these agencies.

You know, someone like me, I understand what has happened because I looked at it through global eyes.

You know, build back better.

When have you had these heads of state in every country say exactly the same same words, build back better?

You had me at the bottom nonsense.

Yes.

And

people need to realize that this truly is an attack on national sovereignties of all the countries.

I was in Croatia in December testifying in their parliament, and that's exactly what I said.

You know, Croatians need to remember who they are, love their country, and take back their power.

The same thing with Americans.

This is a country that understands freedom, that understands this is the most important thing we have in the world, and we need to take back our power.

Simple as that.

How concerned are you, just as

an individual that grew up under communism, left Yugoslavia, I think, when you were about 18,

and got to Italy and then to America to go to school?

How concerned are you with what you're seeing in just America itself?

You know, I am a true example of what American dream is.

And I have five children.

I do fear for their future.

I fear, you know, with everything that's happening, the transgender policies, we're trying to confuse our children and who they are so that they are easily controlled.

You know, I hate this bipartisan divide because we all should value what America stands for.

If you lose this country, if we lose the freedom, you know, America is a beacon of hope for so many people like myself.

And

everyone, when I speak with people around the world, everyone says, eyes are on the United States.

You know, you guys get your act together, do something.

We're letting it slip through our fingers.

And

I'm a realist, and I have to tell you, I'm afraid.

I am really afraid.

We need a complete change of leadership in November.

Every person needs to go and vote.

They need to become poll

watchers.

They need to do whatever they can to make sure that we have fair elections, that our voices are counted, and that whoever is in leadership next understands that this country is such a unique place in the world, and there is no place like this.

Dr.

Kat Lindley, thank you.

We'll talk again.

The thing that you can do right now is educate yourself.

Go to globalcovidsummit.org.

Globalcovidsummit.org.

If you live in New Hampshire, there is a vote on Bill 1156 on Thursday.

It must pass and stop

the federal government from giving the state sovereignty away.

Your doctors will not be able to speak out.

Your doctors will be silenced.

And we will be controlled by the World Health Organization.

Something really run by China and the United Nations.

I don't know.

I'm not really for it.

Wake up, America.

Doctor, thank you very much for joining us.

All right.

You can call me a snob if you must, but I do have certain convictions and principles in this life, and I stand by them.

And one of those principles is, I mean, sure, it might be nuclear winter outside, but can't we have something warm and yummy on the inside?

Your food should still taste good, even though, you know, the world has come to an end.

I mean, you should, I mean, one of the other principles, you should actually have food

and then it should be good.

In an emergency situation, you need food that won't go bad, tastes delicious, and my Patriot Supply has exactly that.

They have helped my family and millions of others all across America prepare for whatever might come their way with a four-week emergency food kit.

There are 16 food and drink varieties, so you're not going to get bored with your selection.

They all have 2,000 calories a day, breakfast, lunch, dinner, snacks, drinks, all of it.

Durable packaging, so they're able to last up to 25 years in storage.

You can stock up on all the food kits that your family needs now at mypatriotsupply.com.

Get each four-week food kit for $60 off.

Get your free shipping.

Protect yourself.

Protect your people.

Protect your family.

Start preparing at mypatriotsupply.com.

That's mypatriotsupply.com.

Now back to the podcast.

You're listening to the best of the Glenbeck program.

Friend of the program, Mr.

Mike Rowe.

Who are you?

First of all,

with regard to your sponsors,

excellent choices.

Thank you.

I love this foundation.

And at the risk of just shameless pluggery and wanton capitalism, this is an American Giant shirt.

Oh, my gosh.

I have that shirt.

I have that.

I think you wore it last time I was here, and I thought, what are the odds that we'd show up looking like the Bopsy twins?

But you know, Bayard.

He's a friend of mine.

I love him.

And I've had him on my podcast, and he's featured in a new book that you'll love if you haven't seen it.

It's called Flannel.

Yep.

And it's all about what it really takes to make this shirt.

Shockingly difficult.

It is amazing, brother.

I mean, I know you know that.

You gave me a shirt.

10, 11 years ago when you were doing, what was it, 1791?

1791.

Yeah, I still have it.

It was like, it was like a canvas workshop.

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

And ever since then, man, I've been obsessed with trying to better understand the drama and the trauma of getting textile manufacturing back in this country.

It's mind-boggling.

If companies like Levi's would do 5%

of their manufacturing here in America,

America would change.

Yep.

It would change.

For sure.

No interest in it at all.

I mean, when you really start to peel back the layers, and this is, I don't know if this is on your agenda of stuff to talk about, but it is,

I just did a whole thing on the toothpick.

Like the business, we used to be the toothpick capital of the world.

We're very proud of it.

It was a giant industry up in Maine, you know, white birch.

I mean, there's the book on it is amazing.

And when you slowly see the way that we basically gave up on toothpicks, you can start to understand the way we gave up on textiles.

And then you start start asking questions like, well, what hope does Detroit really have?

Like, if we can't get the splinter right, if we can't get a shirt right, right?

So there are no small things.

Anyway, what American Giants are doing, I think, is, I think it matters because

they're 13 years at it now, right?

So that's, you know, good for you for having them on it.

I love them.

I love them.

So, Mike, let's just talk about the state of the world because we are being boxed.

If you're a small business guy, you have under 20 employees, you now have a Transparency Act where you'll spend two years in jail if you don't tell the federal government, the Treasury Crimes Division,

everything that they want to know.

I don't know how much that's going to cost the small businessman

in just time alone.

Plus, you have the PRO Act, which has now just been done through the Department of Labor.

We don't vote on anything anymore.

It's just a new guidelines.

Guidelines.

Yes, yes.

New guidelines.

And

what is that going to do to, when we think gig economy, we think, you know, Uber drivers, et cetera.

No, no, no.

Truckers alone.

Will we have groceries at our stores?

50,000 in California alone.

50,000.

I had a guy on my podcast called Tom Odom, who's one of these truckers, and he's been written about in the press.

And I was just so interested in his story.

In fact, I interviewed him while he was in his truck driving across the fruited plain, you know, and he just pulled over and we had this amazing conversation.

But people,

I like to talk about it in terms of unintended consequences, but I realize now that I might be giving too much credit.

Way too much credit.

Right.

But look, I'm trying to stay in whatever lane is left to me.

But when I first saw it, he'll be taking that lane away from you soon.

It's getting narrow.

It's getting narrow.

When I first saw this thing rear its ugly head, it was,

to your point,

aimed toward the gig economy in Silicon Valley, mostly Uber and Lyft.

And then it just grew and grew and grew.

Graphic artists, writers, cinematographers, dancers.

So many people.

And I'm like, how many are actually going to be impacted?

And then the question was, how many people are actually freelancing right now?

And the answer is north of 70 million in the whole country.

And so what the drafters of AB5 asked us to believe initially was that huge numbers of workers were being shamelessly victimized by greedy and rapacious capitalists who should have hired them as employees and therefore

opened the door to benefits and so forth.

Now, did that ever happen?

Yeah, I suspect.

It's a big country and there's exceptions to every rule.

But the number of people who were adversely affected prior to this versus the number of people who have now lost the freedom to work the way they want is mind-boggling.

And it happened in California, of course.

And to your point, it's happened and is happening right now.

And when people realize what this means, you know, you want to set your own schedule?

Forget it.

You want to eat what you kill?

Forget it.

We don't want to think that way anymore because

that person might fail.

And if that person fails, well, then the narrative goes, we just can't tolerate that.

I'm sure you've been to Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle.

I was just over there for the first time and the new king was in the castle

and he's got this whole wing by himself and he lands his giant helicopter right there in his backyard.

And I've never been, like I've, I've been to, you know, the American castles and I've never had a problem with it.

Never.

I walked through that castle and it pissed me off the entire time because I thought there is no one in this country that could ever build this except the one who's cornered the market.

Right.

You know,

there's no opportunity.

none to actually become something because the government has you so pigeonholed and people just accept it and i don't want to be like that i don't want to live in that kind of country you know if there's no risk there's no reward well there's the four-letter word right risk i guess risk and maybe debt are the the only four-letter words right now that i think are truly for sale you know we have to have honest conversations about both of those things the willingness to accept risk is the fundamental bedrock of freelancing.

Right.

And not everybody is willing to take that risk.

Some people just want a stable job.

And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Nothing wrong with that.

It's so similar.

I think the reason this thing has become such an issue for me is because it translates perfectly into a four-year education versus a trade school.

This idea that we have to put our thumb on the scale, this idea that one has to be elevated at the expense of the other is precisely what's informing the PRO Act.

We're not saying

that

it's good to be an employee.

We're saying it's so good that if you don't do that, then you're doomed.

You are engaging in a level of behavior that's so risky, you're actually posing some sort of existential threat, not just to yourself, but to your family, to your neighbor, and so forth.

So

it's amazing how we can't simply put all the options on the table and let the grown-ups decide what fits best.

I got to tell you, you say even in today's world where universities are taking our children and molding them into the exact Woodrow Wilson said the job of a university is to make a man the most unlike his father as possible.

Okay.

That was his goal.

And that's really kind of the goal now, I think, in many, in many places.

And so many people will say, because I've got two teenagers, are they going to go to college?

No, probably not.

One of them, maybe.

The other one, trade school, maybe.

Don't know.

Don't know.

It's going to be up to them.

And what is the value of a big, expensive, $250,000 education if you're not going to use it?

If you don't have something, if you're just like, wow, I think I'm going to do this.

A, the world is changing so fast.

We don't know what jobs are going to be there.

I worry that, like, I'm the product of a liberal arts education.

I got one.

It served me well.

I'm glad I got one.

Yeah.

Did it lead directly to my chosen field?

No, it did not.

But It comes in handy every single day.

And mine

consists of two years at a community college and another couple of years at a university.

And when I finished in 84, the whole thing cost $12,200, all of it.

Today, same schools, same course loads, $92 grand.

Now, nothing in the history of this country has increased faster than the cost of a four-year degree.

Bitcoin.

Bitcoin.

Bitcoin.

Well,

but then fallen and then back and then fine.

Right.

I mean, look, it's but I mean, really, if you look at healthcare, if you look at real estate, if you look at food, and if you look at energy, the big four, those things have all been eclipsed by the cost of a four-year degree.

But still, we can't help ourselves.

Still, we've told this whole generation, if you don't get one, you're screwed.

Right.

And that's criminal.

It's a shame because my liberal arts education right now is on this thing.

All of us.

We have all of it.

I've got access to 98% of the known information right now for free.

Yeah.

Okay.

But still, still we charge.

During lockdowns, Columbia raised their rates.

NYU raised their rates.

And we still paid it.

Right.

So look, it's easy to look at the Ivy League, especially now, and point to all sorts of embarrassments.

But it's not even about that.

It's just this bigger thing that's happening where a whole chunk of our workforce is tied to a whole chunk of our education system that has been, that has become the proximate cause of derision.

I said to my son, where did you learn that?

He said,

I can audit a course at MIT

online.

Oh,

okay.

Yeah.

I mean, you have the opportunity unlike any human has had, and yet it's a bad thing.

You are listening to the best of Glenn Beck.

To listen to the rest of this interview, check out the full show podcast.

I guess we should update you.

There is the hearing today on the guy who gave President Biden a pass

saying, oh, you know what?

He's just

a, you know, kind old man who's just forgetful.

Yeah, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.

Yeah.

yeah.

The transcript has actually been released, and the transcript is a little shocking.

I didn't think it was shocking at all.

Actually, I've watched Joe Biden for multiple years, and this is about how I think he is in private.

Now, it's weird because

the portrayal of Biden by the media and, of course, the Democrats, is that when he's in public, he's a bumbling idiot, sure,

but you don't see him like we do.

When he's behind the scenes, he's always on top of everything.

In fact, it's so impressive.

None of these 25, 30-year-old aides can even keep up with the guy.

I mean, it's incredible.

This is so stupid.

And if you believe that, you literally will believe anything.

Yes.

Anything.

But I thought some of the transcript was interesting.

Can I give you some of this?

This is from the people were talking about how he couldn't remember dates.

And I think it's overblown after reading the transcript.

You make up your own mind.

Here's Joe Biden.

He said, this is from the New York Times.

This is actually the part of the New York, of the transcript the New York Times wanted you to know.

What did you know?

Occurred.

Biden, quote, well,

um,

I,

I,

I,

I,

I

don't know.

This is

what

2017, 2018, in that area?

He's uh, her answers, yes, sir.

Remember, in this timeframe, my son is

either been deployed

or is dying.

He is 2017.

2017, 2018, Glenn.

When did he die?

2015.

Oh.

Whoops.

So he's either deployed or dying in 2017 or 18.

And he says,

he's either been deployed or dying.

And so it was.

And by the way, there were still a lot of people at the time when I got out of the Senate that were encouraging me to run in this period, except the president.

Which is just sad that he has to admit this.

Yes, yes.

And I'm not, and that's not a mean thing to say.

He just thought that she had a better chance of winning the presidency than I did.

Says quite a bit.

The most hated woman in all of politics.

She's a better bet.

And so I hadn't, I hadn't, at this point, even though I'm at Penn, I hadn't walked away from the idea that I may run for office again.

But if I ran again, I'd be running for president.

And

so, what was happening, though?

What month did Bo die?

Oh, God, May 30.

And then all of the lawyers step in at this point.

White House lawyer, 2015.

2015.

2015.

Unidentified male speaker.

2015.

And he says, was it 2015 he had died?

Unidentified mail speaker.

It was May of 2015.

Biden.

It was 2015.

Biden's personal lawyer.

Or I'm not sure the month, sir.

I'm not sure that was the year, though.

Another person chumming in.

That's right, Mr.

President.

It was 2015.

All these other people remember when his Biden's son died.

And he said, and what happened in the meantime is that as,

and Trump gets elected in November of 2017

question mark unidentified male speaker 2016

we have actually elections every four years yeah he doesn't know always an even number yeah you know without question he's only been in government his entire life so how would he know that that's you know of course that's just the senate um 2016 uh 2016 that all right so why do i have 2017 here that's when you left office january of 2017 says the White House counsel.

Yeah, okay, but that's when Trump gets sworn in, January.

You see, he's just repeating what other people, after he's wrong, people correct him, and then he just repeats what they're saying.

And every person has seen this with an old relative, right?

Like when you're in a conversation with them, they don't know what the answer is.

You tell them, and then they kind of just repeat it.

Like, it helps them kind of,

you know, center themselves on what's going on.

When you don't have somebody to give you something to repeat, this is what that relative sounds like.

This is from yesterday, cut one.

Tremendous amount of things you can cut.

Let me be precise.

Tremendous amount of things you can do, not cut.

He said, I will,

but the bottom line is he's still at it.

Oh, my God.

Wow.

So you got that going for you.

Now, this is the guy who is, according to the governor of Alaska, Mike Dunleavy,

sanctioning Alaska more than he has sanctioned Iran.

Governor Dunlevy, welcome to the program.

Hey, going, good morning.

Hey, good morning.

So I know it's really early for you.

Thank you for being on the program.

That's quite a statement to make.

Well, it is, but if you look at the 55, 56 actions now, compared to the 19 actions that have been set against Iran in

2005, this is 55 actions since the Biden administration came into office against one of its own states, a resource-producing state like Alaska.

And so it is serious.

It is real.

And

many of us in Alaska view it as an economic war on Alaska.

So 56 executive orders and actions targeting your state.

Can you go through some of them?

Oh, absolutely.

So, for example, in 2017, under the JOBS Act that was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump, that required lease sales in Anwar, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the coastal plain area that was always up for oil production when it went.

Those leases were sold, and then under the Biden administration, they unilaterally canceled them.

That's a violation of law.

That's huge because that has one of the last remaining large oil and gas fines, probably in North America.

That was taken off the list.

Offshore oil leases in the Arctic, off the list.

13 million acres in NPRA.

Now NPRA, National Petroleum Reserve, up in Alaska that was founded over 100 years ago under President Harding, its sole purpose was to provide oil for the nation.

It was a

naval petroleum preserve at first.

And so

this is just a handful of

incidents of what we call sanctions against Alaska that make it it difficult for us to produce oil,

makes it difficult for us to mine, makes it difficult for us to even get into the Tongass National Forest for timber, the largest national forest in the United States.

We really can't get into that forest to harvest timber.

This is one thing that I have not experienced, so I don't know if I understand it.

They're no longer building roads or maintaining any of the roads.

So you can't get in

to haul lumber out.

And then they've also banned you from taking out

mature lumber.

Is that right?

Old growth.

That's correct.

Old growth.

And not only are they not building roads, they dismantled all of the

mills that were in Southeast Alaska.

And this happened

under the Clinton administration.

However, under President Trump, he began to restore it as an actual working force for timber, for mining, for recreation.

And then when the Biden administration came in, they once again closed it down again.

And so it's just been a series each year of different actions, different executive orders that are targeted against Alaska.

And Glenn, here's the interesting thing.

I don't think your listeners understand about Alaska.

We were the only state required at statehood in 1959 in our statehood act.

We were required to collectivize all the resources in Alaska under the government, under the state government.

And the reason for that is those that were contemplating allowing Alaska to become a state felt it had too small of a population, about 150 to 200,000 people, to pay for itself through things like an income tax or a statewide sales tax.

So they compelled us to collectivize those resources to develop those resources to pay for ourselves.

And that's the cruel irony of this whole thing is We were allowed to come in as a state as long as we developed our resources.

And now we're being being told we can't develop our resources, which means our viability as a state is in question.

I'm looking at the map

of Alaska.

And by the way, you know this.

Alaska is far more beautiful than anybody could ever describe.

It is stunning.

And it's also enormous.

Flying over Alaska, you're like, when does this state ever end?

But

I'm looking at the map.

You maybe have,

maybe a third of Alaska is not protected now?

Pretty much.

Yes, that's correct.

And as a matter of fact,

you know, we had national parks before 1980, and in the waning days of Jimmy Carter, his gift to Alaska on the way out was to build even more monuments and wilderness areas, taking millions and millions of acres off the table for Alaska's ability once again to develop some of those resources.

And by the way, Glenn, we develop our resources, the little that we're allowed to, in probably the most responsible manner in the world.

And

what really befuddles many of us up here is the environmentalists obviously have their hooks in this administration, and they don't want to have any development in Alaska, but they're okay with it going overseas to places like Iran, to places like China, to places like Venezuela, where the environment is not protected, human rights are not protected.

And as we know in the case of Iran, they're now producing 3.74 million barrels of oil per day.

They're using some of that money to fund terrorism throughout the Middle East.

So none of that makes any sense to us.

So how is this impacting you as a state, your state funds, and the people who do business up in Alaska?

Well,

great question.

So what happens is

there's a chill for investment in Alaska.

In other words, outfits that would otherwise be investing in mining, oil, gas, timber, they go other places because the uncertainty caused by this administration and these actions, level against Alaska, once again, 55, I think it's 56 now, just make it such an uncertain situation that investors don't want to come here.

Our population right now is pretty much stagnant.

We haven't grown in the

last few years because of some of these actions.

Many of our young people are actually leaving the state and going to the lower 48 where there's more opportunity.

And so the impact on our coffers

is going to be significant.

Right now,

we run about 490,000 barrels through our pipeline.

We were able to get Willow, the Willow project, passed or allowed to be put into play.

And so with that investment, we should get another 140,000 barrels here in the next several years.

But nonetheless, what we're looking at the midterm, Glenn, and the long term, the prospects don't look very good for investors, don't look very good for opportunity in Alaska.

And really what this appears to many Alaskans is an attempt to just turn Alaska into a big national park.

and

absolutely hamstring the viability of the state going forward.

So it's an uncertain situation which causes a lack of investment and uncertainty.

I have to tell you, if Congress doesn't take their power back

and

take the

unconstitutional power

away from the administrative offices,

we're not free and we have no way to fight this.

What are you doing to fight?

Well,

we've had a lawyer up, unfortunately.

We've asked our legislature the past several years for

millions of dollars in funds, what we call our statehood defense, to fight against their own federal government in order to slow down what these agencies are doing, in order to try and reverse some of the things that these agencies are doing.

And so we end up spending money, again, against our own federal agencies, our own federal government.

And I mean, Glenn, you know that the federal government has unlimited resources.

A state like Alaska does, does not.

And so we're fighting them.

We're trying to enlist the help of other

states.

We've been talking with other

congressmen and senators from other states explaining Alaska's situation.

We're getting, I think, a good reception, especially from those on the Republican side.

I also have to say senators like Joe Manchin from a resource state like West Virginia has been very sympathetic to the plight of Alaska.

He understands it well.

So

we're trying to build up a group of legislators, congressmen, senators uh and other governors to understand what's going on with alaska because once it happens here and if they're able to uh be successful at snuffing out the uh the the future of alaska in terms of a development state there's no there's no telling where they're going to stop

this is so concerning um

how can we help mike

well this is i mean the form you're giving me right now is a great way to get this out to people and people people need to understand that as you said Gwen Alaska is a very beautiful place.

And because of that, we do take care of it.

We have some of the strictest environmental regulations there is.

The state itself put them in.

So we know how to develop our resources.

But what the Biden administration is doing is just trying to kill off the whole enterprise.

And so just letting people know, sharing the 55 actions that

Dan Sullivan, our senator, had put together on that sheet is going to be helpful.

And then we're going to be getting some congressmen and senators up here, hopefully, this summer, so they can see on the ground how well we take care of the state, but also see the

impact of what the Biden administration is doing.

So, Governor, let us know how we can help

other than this.

Keep us informed on this because, as you say, they pick on the one that nobody really is paying attention to.

And if they can do this to Alaska, they'll do it to a lot of our states.

Thank you very much.

From Alaska, Governor of Alaska, Governor Mike Dunleavy.

Bundle and safe with Expedia.

You were made to follow your favorite band, and from the front row, we were made to quietly save you more.

Expedia, made to travel.

Savings vary and subject to availability, flight-inclusive packages are at all protected.