Best of the Program | Guest: Matt Ridley | 11/29/21
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Listen and follow along
Transcript
At blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments, it's about you, your style, your space, your way.
Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right.
From free expert design help to our 100% satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.
Because at blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you.
Visit blinds.com now for up to 50% off with minimum purchase plus a professional measure at no cost.
Rules and restrictions apply.
Stu, I don't know if you know this, but it could be as deadly as Ebola.
Oh no.
And spread, I think, just by sharing watches.
It's Armatron.
They now say could be as
Omicron.
Omicron.
Oh, is that a Transformer?
No.
It sounds like a Transformer, but apparently we just didn't know anything about the Greek alphabet.
Okay, things are revealing themselves like they're like a trailer in a movie.
I'm like, oh my gosh, what's the next one?
Why are we surprised?
So it's, yes, it's the new COVID scare.
Some say could be as bad as Ebola.
Highly doubt that, but we give you all the facts on that.
And
we have a great guest, Matt Ridley, on.
Yeah, he has a new book out about the origins of COVID-19.
He talks to us about the Omicron variant.
Should we be worried about it?
Also, a little bit about Fauci and where this virus may have come from.
And he's one of those people, along with a scientist from, I think, MIT, talking about how this very well could be from the lab.
No.
no, and he goes through all the science behind that and why that looks to be.
He's just questioning science, he's questioning Fauci.
That's what I got from it.
All this and more on today's podcast.
You're listening to
the best of the Blendbeck program.
Oh, my goodness, Omicron.
I think that should be a transformer.
And in a way, it is.
This is the transformation now of COVID-19.
It is so deadly, so deadly that, let me see if I can get this.
The Belgian, I think it's the Belgian prime minister says this should be called COVID-21.
So we should say that it it was
discovered in the year.
He says it's three times more infectious than the original virus.
So it should be, instead of COVID, I'm quoting, instead of COVID-19, it should be COVID-21.
2021, that's two.
Shouldn't it be 22?
I have no idea.
So anyway,
the panic began
just this this weekend, the World Medical Association chair demanding now national lockdowns
and making sure that everyone is mandated all around the world.
He says the new South African variant is a good example
of the mutations.
and us trying to prevent every possible infection and how it can't be done.
We don't know anything about its dangerousness yet, but it seems to be spreading rapidly.
Now, there's no fear-mongering in this following sentence.
Again, we don't know anything about its dangerousness, but it seems to be spreading rapidly.
My great concern is it could lead to a variant that is as infectious as Delta,
but as dangerous as Ebola.
As dangerous as Ebola.
Ebola.
Wow.
It might have mutated a little faster
than, you know, it's weird to go from like, you're sick and if you're old, you could die like from pneumonia kind of like thing
to blood shooting out of every orifice of your body.
That's the danger of Omicron.
Omicron.
Yeah.
Okay, so I don't,
yeah, I don't think it's going to become Ebola.
Really?
Yeah.
You're going to come up and say that right now.
Come out and say that.
Yeah, yeah.
Now, here's the next.
This is from CNN, their headline.
Omicron variant puts world in a race against time.
A race against time.
Huh.
Now,
the biostatistician professor, Sheila Bird, said the test results from Amsterdam were concerning, but more data is needed.
Adding that the vaccination status and age distribution of those infected will also need to be considered before any conclusions could be made about this variant.
The situation should be seen with alert rather than alarm until we know more.
Okay, so that doesn't that doesn't sound like Ebola, does it?
No, because it wouldn't really need a lot of time.
You know, yeah, the patients came in and
they were bleeding out of their eyes and boils all over their body.
Give it more time.
Let's see what happens.
Let's see what happens.
I mean, yes, it's a little different than the normal cough and fever, but let's give it a couple weeks.
Okay, so now here is the South African doctor who was the one who kind of found this strain.
She was the first one to go, there's something else here.
This is different.
We've seen a lot of Delta patients during the third wave, and this this one didn't fit the clinical picture.
Most patients we are seeing have very, very mild symptoms, and none of them so far have been admitted to the hospital.
We've been able to treat these patients conservatively at home.
Hmm.
Also, so far patients have not reported a loss of smell or taste, and there has been no major drop in oxygen levels with the new variant.
The most prominent clinical complaint is severe fatigue for one or two days and a headache and body aches and pain.
My general normal stance is severe fatigue.
Like I just, that's just my normal life.
I wouldn't even notice this.
I wouldn't notice it.
I just want to go back to bed.
That's the way I start my day.
Yeah.
So, again,
just based on the woman who discovered the variant,
that doesn't sound like Ebola.
No.
And doesn't sound like something we should worry about, really.
Yeah.
My understanding is that most of the patients they've seen with it have been younger.
Right.
So.
Yeah, 40.
Yeah.
They say it's hitting people under 40.
Under 40.
Yeah.
But again.
But again.
With severe fatigue.
Definitely not.
For one or two days.
Okay.
I mean, I don't think there's any other than one crazy person's
right.
But the media, the tone of the media coverage feels
a race against time.
That is what it feels like.
Yeah, okay.
All right.
So here's the truth on this.
It was detected in Botswana and South Africa while we were having our turkey.
Since then, Canada, Germany, the UK, Hong Kong, Belgium, Singapore, and Holland all have had cases of Omicron.
No confirmed cases here in the United States.
It has been found now in more than a dozen nations, most contact tracing showing travel from South Africa as the most common source.
South Africa's had had more than 200 confirmed cases as of yesterday.
The chairwoman of the South African Medical Association assured the media that while they're closely monitoring the situation, the good news is that to date there have been no deaths from the new variant and quoting, most people have mild, very,
very mild symptoms, end quote.
So
we have the we have the mutation.
The media wants you to panic over this.
There is no reason to panic over this.
However, New York has declared a state of emergency.
New York has declared a state of emergency despite not a single case being identified in the state.
Or the country yet, by the way.
Yes.
I mean, that'll probably happen soon.
Sure.
We don't have any in the country at this time.
We probably don't know about it because the symptoms are very,
very mild.
The governor of California, Michigan, and New York have issued health health alert warnings to public agencies, including schools, about the new variant of concern.
Despite the fact there's no evidence the new variant is more virulent or deadly.
Now,
Stu,
you're into this kind of stuff.
You're into stats.
Sure.
You're into science.
This show is known for its scientific breakthroughs.
Yes, mostly our 44-part series.
Right.
On science in general.
On science in general.
Yeah, yeah.
And I'm a doctor.
So let me ask you this.
And feel free to talk down to me.
Okay.
Okay.
Pretend I don't know.
But
when you have a virus like COVID,
what is the virus' goal?
To find a new host, to replicate it.
Find a new host.
Right.
What stops a virus from finding a new host?
Well,
not being no pathway to transmit.
Okay.
Right.
All right.
Or the host dies.
Okay.
The host dies.
When the host dies, the virus dies.
Unless somebody's like, hey, let's play with grandpa's dead body.
Right.
Okay.
Which does happen in the movies often.
All the time.
All the time.
Especially in California and New York and Michigan.
So
if the virus acts like, oh, I don't know, every other virus known to man,
the virus looks for a way to spread faster,
but be less deadly.
Correct?
Usually this is what happens.
Yeah.
Yeah.
In almost all circumstances with a virus, almost,
it
generally speaking
becomes less deadly, more virulent, because that's in the best interest of the virus.
Usually that's what happens.
Yeah, yeah.
Okay, all right.
So let me ask you this.
And this is, by the way, why, despite the eye bleeding, Ebola has only killed 11,000 people exactly
since the beginning of time.
Yes.
And all generally in a little area.
Very little area.
It's very hard to continue the transmission lines because it tends to kill most of the people.
It kills everybody quickly.
And then people are like, hey, I haven't heard from Uncle Bob in a while.
I haven't heard from Aunt Helen either.
Maybe we should get on the space suits and go see what happened to the village.
Right.
Okay.
It doesn't spread because it kills people so quickly.
And there's tons of Aunt Helens in these villages.
That's one thing you need to know.
Tons, tons.
They're almost all named Helens.
So with that understanding, I have a very important question.
Yes.
Okay.
Let me give it to you in 60 seconds.
This is the best of the Glen Beck program.
Matt Ridley, the author of How Innovation Works and the new book, Viral.
We wanted to have him on today.
I just did a podcast with him.
If you haven't listened to it, grab the podcast.
It's really, really good.
Matt, welcome back to the program.
How are you?
Great to be with you again, Glenn.
How are you?
I'm good.
I'm good.
So, Matt,
I want to talk about the book, but can we lead here with the Omicron variant?
We know very little about it,
And I want to make sure I understand
the way viruses generally work.
They don't want to kill the host because then they die.
So they generally become less virulent, more transmissible.
Correct?
Well, correct for respiratory viruses, yes.
There are 200 kinds of virus that cause the common cold, coronaviruses, adenoviruses, rhinoviruses.
And none of of them kill the host, at least very, very, very rarely.
And that's not true of sexually transmitted viruses, insect transmitted viruses, and some waterborne diseases, one or two others.
So the key is anything spread by sneezes, you know, and coughs does not want you even to feel sick because then you'll stay at home and you won't go and meet people and you won't spread it.
Now, when I say want to, I'm using a kind of shorthand.
Yeah, I know.
The mild strains outcompete the tough strains and this is already happening with delta the latest version of delta is definitely milder than the first version of delta and um probably delta was milder than alpha we haven't got good enough data to be absolutely sure so the fact that they're more transmissible these new variants is not the same as saying they're more virulent in fact they're usually less virulent and you know this thing is going to evolve into a mild endemic cold i suspect over time.
It could well be that Omicron is a very good thing if that's the case.
If it's very transmissible, it's going to oust the Delta.
It's going to kill off Delta, but it's going to do so in a way that replaces it with a much milder version, if these early reports from South Africa about it being very mild turn out to be true.
We can't be absolutely certain yet because it might just be in young people where
COVID is pretty mild anyway.
Why is everybody freaking out around the world?
Why are we closing everything down?
The UN had a national security
council meeting about this.
Why?
Well, the UN had a meeting
in a panic because they realized that
they'd got to mu, you know, in the Greek alphabet.
And the next one was Nu, which didn't quite make sense because everybody would think it was just the new variant.
The one after that was Zi Xi,
which is the same name as the president of China.
So they thought, let's leave out Niu and G, and let's just go straight to Omicron, which is the next letter, because we don't want to offend the Chinese.
And that's fair enough.
It was kind of provocative otherwise.
But the funny thing is, they didn't admit it.
They gave no reason for this
jumping to Omicron.
They eventually admitted it
under questioning.
But why not just say so?
Why not just say we didn't want to offend the Chinese?
So we didn't want to call it the Xi Jinping virus.
virus?
Anyway,
why is everyone freaking out?
Because of what happened with Delta.
Delta came out of India in the spring and it, or sorry, the end of last year, and it
surged throughout the world.
It sent countries back into lockdown, it caused a lot more hospitalizations, and it broke through the vaccines.
It turned out to be transmissible by people who had been vaccinated, although not nearly as dangerous to them.
And I think countries were quite slow to close flights from India.
They got a lot of criticism for that.
It wouldn't have made any difference.
This thing was going to be around the world whether we whatever we did to flights, I suspect, because you can't seal countries off these days.
But I think
politicians wanted to be seen to be doing something fast.
But it was tough on the South Africans because they were doing really good work identifying these variants.
They've They've got good molecular surveillance going on.
And
they put their hand up in a very transparent way and said, look, we found a new one.
It's got a lot of mutations in it.
It probably is very transmissible.
It might even be
less
than protected by the virus.
And it might be less virulent as well.
And by the vaccine, I meant.
And
then they get punished by shutting down travel, cutting off tourism and so on.
And it turns out it's already in Britain and a number of other European countries already.
So
I think that
the chances are we ought to reopen flights to southern Africa.
We're not going to stop it that way.
I doubt that if it's as infectious as they say, that more mandates on masks will make much difference.
Better surveillance, faster booster programs, that's how we're going to defeat it.
And it may be, as I say, that it ends up being a good thing if it displaces Delta with a milder version.
Okay, so in your book, Viral, set this up.
You and
another scientist
get together.
Lead a channel.
Yeah, and you want to
find out how did this whole thing start?
What is it?
Where did it come from?
And you want to
just nail down some basic details.
What did you find?
Yeah.
Well, what we found was that the more we looked,
the harder it got to explain how it got to the city of Wuhan in particular by natural means, and the easier it got to come up with an explanation of how it got there in the hands of scientists.
Because
if it was like SARS, we'd have a pattern of infection in food handlers, we'd have a pattern of infected animals being sold in markets.
None of that came to light.
It should have come to light in the first couple of months.
Here we are two years into the pandemic, and we haven't got any such pattern that would support it.
And recently you've had a paper published with a lot of rasmatos saying we found patient,
the first index patient, patient zero.
It was infected in the middle of December.
She was a shrimp seller in the market who was infected about a month after the thing got started.
And there's no evidence she picked it up from her shrimps.
So
this was a strange exaggeration of
an interesting little bit of work they'd done on some of the early classes.
I found it odd that
Fauci brings this up and says that, no, no, no, it was from the wet market.
I mean, everything that I have read shows it's definitely not from the wet market.
They tested everything.
Well, the Chinese authorities said it's not from the wet market.
Now, we know better than to trust the Chinese authorities, so we don't necessarily believe that.
But
they did test animals in that market, and they found no infected animals.
Now, they might have missed one, of course, it's true, but they tested the surfaces,
the sewage, the doorknobs, the countertops, et cetera, in the market, and they did find the virus.
But the one they found was not the...
the ancestral strain because there were two strains in existence by then and only one of the strains was in the market.
So, you know,
that market evidence shows very clearly that what happened there was a super spreader event, as far as we can tell.
Of course, more data may come to light at any time.
And therefore, we've got to look seriously at the other possibility, which is that the bats that are infected with these viruses, and by the way, no bats or pangolins were on sale in that market.
We now know that for sure.
The bats that were infected with these viruses live a thousand miles away in southern China.
Who goes to caves where these particular horseshoe bats live?
They don't live in buildings, these bats, they live in caves.
Who goes to these remote caves and then goes north to Wuhan?
Nobody, as far as we know, except one group, and that is the scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology who've been doing this for 10 years on an intensive scale.
And the reason is because they're trying to track down all sales-like viruses, catalogue them, get to know them, do experiments on them, and so on.
And where do they they take the samples they get from bats?
They take them back to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
And that's why when the pandemic began, the closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 was found in a freezer at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
It's called RATG-13,
since a slightly more close one has been found in Laos.
But
We also know that the Wuhan Institute of Virology scientists were going to Laos and bringing viruses back from there.
So we need to know all the viruses they collected and brought to Wuhan, and they won't tell us.
They won't tell us any of the viruses they've collected since 2016.
And that doesn't seem to me good enough.
We've had at least five million people dead.
What do you take from their shutting down of the
vault, the website where it has their database, yeah.
Yeah, their database.
What do you take?
That happened on September 12th.
Then they asked for more security on September 12th.
Then they
completely revamp their air handling system three days later.
And then they get a, what is it, an O2 incinerator
a couple of weeks after that.
And
we also know that there were patients being admitted.
Three of them were researchers from the Wuhan lab.
And that happened, I think, in November, October or November.
What do you make of all that?
Well, it's very hard to tell.
We're dealing with sketchy information.
The U.S.
intelligence community says that there were three researchers from the lab who were
hospitalized in November.
I can't verify that, so I don't know whether that's the case or not, and obviously the Chinese authorities have not admitted that.
If you look at the genomics of the virus and work out its ancestry, you come to a date somewhere around the middle of November, but it could be as early September, it could be as late as early December.
Okay, so you get a range when it's likely to be the first infection of a human being.
So
we've got the whole of that autumn.
We've got a strange thing that there's the World Military Games in Wuhan in October, and they do an exercise, a security exercise, as to what to do if a coronavirus breaks out, which seems a slightly unusual thing
to be suddenly talking about.
But then you have to remember, SARS was on their mind from 10 years earlier or whatever.
And
as for those events in September that you mentioned,
the taking down of the website, not the website, the database,
with 22,000 samples from bats and rodents in it, very, very useful database that we'd love to see, and it never comes back up again.
12th of September seems too early.
It seems unlikely that it was necessarily because an accident had happened or because they knew that there had been an outbreak or something like that.
It's more likely that it was something to do with the end of one grant and the beginning of another, a review of the samples that they were going to do,
transferring the leadership of the program from one group to another, moving the lab from one location to another, which we know was happening around that time.
So there's quite a lot of stuff going on, and that could explain some of the new equipment, et cetera.
But of course, all that movement, all that
reviewing of samples and things, could lead to an accidental exposure.
And one of the things things we know, because this happened with SARS three times, is that sometimes people get infected without knowing it.
You know, there is no accident in the lab, there is no dropped test tube, but one of the researchers in the lab ends up infected and
tested positive for this virus.
Right, exactly.
So, sometime after September, because of something that happened then, it's possible that there was enough activity in the lab that led to
an incidental infection or something like that.
But we can't tell until we get more information.
And as I say, the Chinese authorities will not release the names and serial numbers of the viruses that they collected after 2016.
More with Matt Ridley.
The name of the book is Viral.
It is the story of the COVID virus.
Matt Ridley continues here in just a second.
You're listening to the best of the Glenbeck program.
Welcome to the Glenbeck program.
We've been talking about Omnicron, the new variant,
and the wild overreaction
to this, at least that's what we think, seeing that the person who actually discovered it said that no one's been hospitalized for it.
It hits people under 40 and the worst aspects of it is you feel fatigue and achy body for two days and everyone's been treated at home.
So why are we closing everything?
What is happening?
What is it that they know that we don't know?
Or is this just another grab for power?
Or is this our sainted, wonderful people in Washington that are just like, we want to keep America safe?
Yeah.
I would like to ask you to watch
and pass on the Blaze TV's
crime.
or cover-up.
Oh, okay.
You know what?
It's on YouTube.
Yeah, go to YouTube.
I can just share it from YouTube.
So I just go to YouTube.
Go to YouTube.
And I search for Glenn Beck.
Glenn Beck.
Crimes.
Crimes.
Or cover-up.
Correct.
It's easy.
It's an easy thing to search for.
Okay, and it pops up here.
All right.
There's a first one is a story from Forbes.
Forbes.
Yeah.
What's it?
Is it on me?
It says the evidence is mounting.
There's been a cover-up, and I guess it's a clip of our interview with Rand Paul.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
But okay.
Then you've got
Glenn Beck walks off interview after Blaze layoffs.
Yeah, isn't that weird?
Three years ago.
From three years ago, a Brian Stelter interview pops up.
That's interesting.
That's weird.
Okay.
Glenn Beck joins Operation Underground Railroad.
Uh-huh.
Okay.
Do you find anything about
the Try Not to Laugh challenge with Glenn Beck?
Uh-huh.
Glenn Beck opens up to Tucker.
So here's the thing:
you can't search YouTube and find our special.
It's still up,
but they've made it impossible to find.
I mean, literally, I typed in the exact name of the title.
Yeah, Glenn Beck, crimes or cover-up, crimes or cover-up.
Why wouldn't that come up first?
Correct.
Why don't you try Glenn Beck Crimes or Cover-Up?
The Blaze.
See if it comes up there.
Okay.
The Blaze.
Now the first one is Glenn beck walks up off of interview with brian stelter
so we've given it the literal title
the guy who did it and the network that it is on that's really weird
yeah yeah you don't think there's some some stifling of that do you
I mean, it's pretty clear.
It'd be tough to make a case the other way.
I mean, like, you know, if you go to Blaze TV, if you just go to Blaze TV's page,
you could find it there, right?
I mean, it's not that they took it down from the internet.
No, I couldn't find it.
I couldn't find it, what, Saturday night.
I couldn't find it.
Now, I know.
Let me see.
Let me try.
What was it called?
It's a crime.
Crimes or cover-up.
Or cover-up.
It's on the back.
It's on the Blaze TV.
It's on Blaze TV's YouTube channel.
I'm searching just Google and it comes up.
And here's a special.
So it is up on YouTube.
Yeah.
It has 645,000 views.
Yeah.
Should be a lot more than that.
Still,
I can guarantee you it's never coming up on your recommended list, ever.
And you can't even search YouTube and find it.
You can go to Google,
but if you go to search for it on YouTube,
you can't find it.
Now,
this is directly tied to another subject.
This is the
COVID is the emergency that is being utilized to change the world.
And you don't have to take that from me.
You can hear that from our vice president, our president, John Kerry.
You can hear it from the Prime Minister of Japan, the Prime Minister of
India.
You can hear it from the Prime Minister of the UK.
They all said, this is the way we can change the free market and reshape the world.
Okay.
All right.
What are they reshaping it to?
Which brings me to the next really bizarre thing.
Go to Amazon.com, Stu.
Okay.
Amazon.com.
Go to books.
My new book, The Great Reset, Joe Biden and the Rise of 21st Century Fascism.
So just write the great, just search for The Great Reset, Glenn Beck.
Okay, great reset, Glenn.
Now, this has partially been fixed because
over the holidays, I looked it up.
What do you get?
First thing is Sean Spicer's new book.
Okay, that's an ad, right?
Oh, yeah, yep, it's an ad.
Then Glenn Beck, The Great Reset.
So it's there.
Okay.
All right.
Look at it carefully, right?
It's mine.
It's yours, your book, the cover that we have here.
Correct.
Yeah, well, I'll tell you about that in a second.
Go to the next book:
COVID-19, The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab.
Okay, that's great because that's the actual Klaus Schwab is the guy who's designed it.
Yep.
So that's fine.
That's the next one.
Summary of The Great Reset by Glenn Beck.
Joe Biden and the Rise of the 21st Century Fascism by Michael Dante.
You can get it immediately.
Get it instantly.
Wow.
That's interesting because the book isn't out yet.
Yeah, no.
But he's got the summary.
So Michael Dantes.
Okay.
Now, then is The Dying Citizen, How Progressive Elites, Right?
Yep.
Then, what's next?
Summary of The Great Reset by Glenn Beck.
This time, Martina Lewis.
Martina Lewis, one of my favorite authors.
Oh, yeah, she's for sure.
So, there's only two.
They're not the same person, by the way.
You're right.
There's only two that I could find today.
There were seven, and three of them were using my cover.
Really?
Yes.
So the book is not your book, it is the summary of your book written by another author.
Mm-hmm.
And three of them were using my cover.
Wow.
Okay.
Wait, I want to read what this book is about.
Oh, here.
This is.
The author has told a story that is intriguing.
Dot, dot, dot.
Michael Dantez has restlessly worked diligently to give us a comprehensive summary.
Dot, dot, dot.
This well-known personality and bestseller has finally rendered a crucial and jaw-breaking narration in this new release.
They've copied and pasted this a hundred times.
And well-made insight and summary of the main book.
This is not the main book.
It is a summary written by Michael Dantez.
It was not made to serve as a replacement, but as a comprehensive guide and insight of the main book, which, by the way, isn't out until January.
Right.
So there can't possibly be any way that this is summarizing what's in the book.
Order it.
Order it.
See if anything comes up.
Ooh, I like that.
Hold on.
There's a little bit more we need to know about this because there's bullet points about what's in the book.
Oh, okay.
Really?
What's in the book?
Number one bullet point.
Uh-huh.
What is included here?
A detailed display of all the mind-blowing information which the author had told.
Wow.
Wow.
Wow.
Then, well-made narration of the main points in the book presented in an understandable and pocket-friendly format.
Wow.
But it's only available on Kindle.
So I guess your phone feels like it's a little bit more.
My book is also pocket-friendly.
Then the next one.
An explanation of all the indirect and indirect statements made by the author to ensure a guided comprehension of the book.
An adequate conclusion of the main book that actualizes a perfect hint.
I don't even know what that one means.
This is like computer-generated garbage.
Yeah.
Oh, and whoa!
Why didn't they leave with this?
At the end, it says, in this summary of the book, you will find all other details that you would find helpful.
That's great.
They're not over-promising, right?
Right.
All other details that you would find helpful.
I think this is computer generated.
I really do.
It does.
I think this is computer generated.
And pretty length is 10 pages, by the way.
I've had, what, 21 bestsellers, something like that.
I've never had this.
Okay.
Maybe somebody would come out and do one thing.
There were seven last week.
And
one of them
with my cover, but a fake book, was ahead of my real book.
Okay.
Wow.
I'm telling you, there is, we are on it.
We are on it.
YouTube does not want to take that offline because they don't want it to be banned to make a bigger deal out of it.
So they're just screwing with the algorithm so you can never find it.
You never find it.
Put it behind, put it into the digital ghetto.
Let them talk in the ghetto.
That's the definition of a digital ghetto.
With this one, why the confusion on this book?
Why?
How can three
post my book with
my artwork
and it be up there?
How's that possible?
How's that possible?
I'm telling you, be very, very careful.
Buy the book, The Great Reset, Joe Biden and the Rise of 21st Century Fascism.
Make sure it is not a summary.
Make sure it is by Glenn Beck.
You know, just be very careful when you buy it, but please buy it now.
The reordering for the second printing is sketchy at best.
We ordered way too many books for a first printing because
we were told the second printing might be as long as five months.
So get this book right now, The Great Reset, Joe Biden and the Rise of 21st Century Fascism.
You can find that at Amazon.
I will say I'd like to recommend your book.
I would, you know, as a friend, I would like your book to be successful.
Sure.
Right.
Right.
However, with this summary available, I don't know that I can honestly recommend to the people to pay the full price for the book.
Now, is that the one?
Because I've just purchased a summary of The Great Reset by Glenn Beck.
Really?
Yes.
And this is how it begins.
First of all, the first line is: the rights of this book continue to be reserved.
Wait,
so
are they in a process of negotiation with you over the rights?
Of course, I'm sure.
Okay.
This is for the man or woman observing at this book all of the satisfactory.
This is computer generated.
This is not easy.
Somebody has done this
with computer generation.
Now, would you like to know what you say in the book?
Yeah, sure.
I'd love to.
Glenn Beck contends that the American way of life may not undergo the great reset and cautions us to prevent it earlier than it is beyond the factor in which it's miles viable to replace course.
What?
Wow, do I want to buy this book?
This is fantastic.
I want to buy this book.
I wonder if Martina's version is even better.
Well, she,
because I have Martina Lewis up here.
You have Martina Lewis's.
In this summary, Martina Lewis captures the climax of Beck's book while making sure that the central message is not derailed from.
Oh, wow.
Lewis writes in a voice that could be heard by every class of readers.
Well, that's not
a Marxist dog whistle there.
She says
the following key points adequately captured in all-encompassing summary, the agenda behind the COVID-19 lockdowns, the true agenda of the meeting held by the World Economic Forum, countries the Great Reset has started manifesting itself in, and what would happen if the agenda of the Great Reset becomes a reality in this world.
Okay, that actually sounds like somebody who is thinking.
That doesn't sound like a computer.
Yeah, this one is better, though.
I think my version's better.
Let me just give you a little.
This is fantastic.
An international intrigue.
This is your book.
An international intrigue among extremely good brokers, commercial enterprise pioneers, and authorities, authorities.
Whoa.
Twice in a row.
Close entryway gatherings within the Swiss Alps.
What?
I want to release a summary of the summary of the Great Race.
Because I want a computer to do it.