Bake-Off, Boris' Book and Bad Movies

This episode is brought to you by our good friends at Sky.

Now, whether it's Scorsese and De Niro, Brits and a Q or Glenn Powell and a slow-motion entrance into frame, some things are just better together.

And Sky and Netflix do just that.

Two heavyweight storytellers side by side on the Sky Essential TV package for just £15 a month, all in one place and on one bill.

Call it the full ensemble.

Sky Originals bringing Gangs of London and the Day of the Jackal.

Netflix delivering global obsessions like Squid Game and Wednesday.

Add Sky Atlantic, Discovery Plus, and more than 90 other channels to that list, and you've got the kind of lineup that bends the week around it, turning ordinary evenings into events.

Sky and Netflix together for £15 a month.

Premium shows, endless choice, and a lineup that feels complete, all in one place.

Visit sky.com to start requires relevant Sky TV and third-party subscriptions.

Sky Essential TV includes a selection of Sky channels, 18 Plus, UK Channel Islands, and Isle of Man only.

Hello and welcome to this episode of the Resters Entertainment Questions and Answers Edition.

I'm Marina Hyde.

And I am Richard Osmond.

We're still apart from each other.

I cannot infect you.

Your COVID has not

passed.

It has not cleared.

It hasn't cleared.

I must keep you safe at all costs.

But by the way, we've got such someone writing something so nice.

Would you remember we were talking about AI commentary on local sports?

You mentioned that.

Oh, yes, I was saying that the thing I would would like, if AI can do anything, I would like it whenever you're walking through like a local park and there's a cricket match going on or a football match going on.

I'd love it if somehow AI could commentate on it for me.

I would sit and watch the whole game.

That was my AI dream.

Well, this is like hearing that flying cars are reality because listen to this.

Chris Wright has written in and he says, I thought your listeners might like to hear this story.

I'm an expat in Singapore and my 10-year-old son plays cricket in a local competition here.

The competition is dominated by Indian kids and the games are live streamed on YouTube which is great as it allows my family to tune in live from Australia when he's batting and bowling.

A few weeks ago I got a message from my brother asking who is providing the colourful commentary for the game and I had to wander around the field looking for the commentator who I couldn't find.

After making inquiries it turns out that $50 of the match fee goes to a guy living in the middle of nowhere in India who commentates on four hours worth of local 10 year olds playing cricket based on the live stream, a team sheet and presumably some messages from the scorers.

It is a great service and well worth the money.

That's so cool.

That's so cute, isn't it?

Can you imagine that?

If you're a kid and you had all of that, I've watched an unbelievable amount of small boys cricket games.

And actually, Kieran used to do the scoring on a sort of WhatsApp for all the different parents.

Like, sometimes they can't, you know, if people are working and couldn't make it there, then there would be like this sort of group and he would do some sort of commentary on that.

But this is of a different level, level, and I'm absolutely gripped by it.

I now want to watch this specific version of it.

So, Chris, please get in touch and give me a

link to that feed and I will watch it.

But I absolutely love the idea of this.

It's literally, Richard, it's nearly flying cars.

Your dream is nearly a reality.

It's nearly a reality.

I have a tiny bit of any other business.

A friend of mine was listening when you were talking about showing the shining to your nine-year-old child.

And lots of people have told us about the inappropriate things they've watched with their children and a friend of mine I used to remain nameless he said when our youngest child was five he and his wife often watched Grey's anatomy yeah he said his wife watched it more than me but that Grey's anatomy is one of those things we were watching and sometimes if I was out she would watch an episode without me and I I was fine with that.

He says, so I come back in one day and his wife is sitting on the sofa with the five-year-old and

watching this thing.

And my friend looks at these two characters on screen and says I god I thought those two had split up and his wife said well it seems not and then his five-year-old daughter said hmm they're not really back together daddy it's just break up sex

and at that point the five-year-old was no longer allowed to watch Grey's anatomy that well how precocious in the most charming way in the most charming way I have a question for you, Marina, from Thomason, who has a question about Zack Snyder, the, let's say, controversialist director of things like Man of Steel, Justice League, a lot of the DC movies.

Anyway, Thomas's question is this.

Do you think Zack Snyder is aware his fans are as toxic as they are and purposefully doesn't care?

Also, what effect will the success of James Gunn's Superman have, if any, on them?

I ask because I find it ludicrous that no matter what happens, they've decided on their version of reality that continues to change as facts change.

Yeah, I mean, this is the sort of emblematic, well, it's not, well, I mean, there's so many toxic fandoms, but Zack Snyder, who's a big DC director, when he made Justice League um for DC um

for four years there was a fan campaign release the Snyder cut

um I mean Zach Snyder is a particular

sort of guy and by the way um during the making that film something awful happened and his daughter took it her own life and it was a sort of and he does credit the fan movement with sort of bringing him back to filmmaking so it's a more nuanced story than it could be but um i think in general yes i think he's he's definitely aware of how toxic it became.

And I think he probably got a lot of toxic stuff as well.

But he's a particular type of person.

He has an unproduced screenplay for The Fountainhead, which I always feel is a character note in a director.

The Ayn Rand book,

Beloved of

Tech Bros Everywhere.

Yeah.

Beloved of Tech Bros Everywhere and terrible people.

He's personally, he's very, very obsessed with directors' cuts.

He always does one.

Sometimes he does two directors' cuts.

You're like.

So,

you know, critics of whoever, ever, any studio ever are always just like, well, the director's cut is better.

You know, I would personally much rather sit through nine and a half hours of Heaven's Gate or whatever it is.

Zach Snyder does actually claim, I think, never to have seen the Warner Brothers theatrical release cut of Justice League.

Sane.

Like, dish it.

No, I have actually seen it, but I didn't see it in theatres.

But I think it's really interesting, as always with these things, if they're not doing it to you, then there is a sort of secret delight that they're kind of doing it in your service.

And will you explain who the fans are and the

very toxic online

group of people who would just say, you know, I want release his cut, release, and were kind of obsessed with it.

And like all of these things, I think they're sort of mirrored in those Star Wars fandoms who kind of went absolutely nuts about The Last Jedi and said,

I don't know, that the character of Rey was a sort of terrible, perfect little feminist that and they completely hounded Kelly Marie Tran off social media completely.

And she was subject to sort of terrible racist and

kind of sexist bullying.

I don't know, I s a lot of critics nowadays feel that they're under constant siege from fandoms and that

that fandoms take critical reviews as kind of personal attacks on them.

And what I think all of this shows is it's become so interesting, you know, fandom has become such an identity.

Fandom has become, and to some extent, you know, and those old, you know, I have friends who before, way before it was cool, who would say to me, this is literally the most uncool thing you could do, would go to things like Star Trek conventions, would go to, you know, that was all uncool.

And then suddenly it's like, oh no, comic-con's very cool all of these things have become cool and they've become much more mainstream to some extent but rather than being for kind of shy nerdy outsidery kids who were quite nice they have become places of huge aggression and that's one of the big stories of um in fandom of the past decade or two is the idea of fandom as a kind of identity it's part of identity politics and like all the rest of identity politics become very vicious well it's like a football team it's like it's like having a it's like having a team.

Suddenly

Star Trek fans can be Millwall fans.

I totally agree with you, but I was thinking about this just when you were saying that.

I was thinking, but it's sort of like factions within the fans of one football team.

And you can say, okay, yes, there are the people who think of themselves as the kind of OG fans, and then there are the prawn sandwich brigade, and

there's some kind of friction between them.

But it's not really like this kind of inter-neesome warfare, which is really odd because it's like

these are battles between people who essentially supposedly love the same fiction you know they love star wars or they love whatever and it becomes this real sort of it's but it's definitely a story that is something of the last decade or two um not even two um you know who loves who whose voice matters most who's purest who's purest um who's liked it longest who who's liked it in the right way um rather than feeling like it's a lovely kind of camaraderie a brotherhood and a sisterhood that you all get swept up in because you basically like the same characters.

It's become like everything a battleground.

And I would say that the Snyder fandom was a particular example of that.

And a kind of like, and to anyone else, like any of these other purity spirals or anything like that,

within about a month or two of it running, to anyone else on the outside, it looks just completely deranged that people have gone this nuts about like a director's cut of a movie.

And yet.

And it's become bigger and bigger.

as you always say, those voices are just the loudest.

Most people who like Star Wars are not like this, and most people who like DC are not like this.

But it just those loudest voices really have taken over, and it has become fandom in so many ways, and in so many different strains of fandom, have bizarrely become a form of identity politics.

Well, you have to be obsessional, you have to want to.

There are certain types of people who will spend eight hours a day on bulletin boards, and almost everyone in the world will not do that.

And there is something about your personality that if you are able to spend eight hours a day on a bulletin board, it says something about you.

I loved this expression, a purity spiral.

Yeah.

Oh, there's some so there's some really interesting things about how purity spirals form.

And there's actually an incredible sort of deep dive article about one in a in a, which I'll try and put into the show notes, about a knitting circle.

And how, no, no, I mean, it's, it's quite extraordinary, but it's, it becomes so completely awful and it becomes caught up with all different types of identity politics.

And it's honestly just some people who got together and formed an online community because they like knitting, and it becomes beyond toxic.

It's really such an interesting, long, deep dive article.

I thoroughly recommend, and I'll put that in the show notes.

Do you have any, have you ever been aware of like a like some like a sort of provisional wing of extremist Thursday Murder Club fans?

Not especially.

It was interesting with the film that there were certain things that changed from the book that people got very exercised about.

But as far as I can see, in quite a fun way, it seems to have been, oh, we'd have loved this, we'd have loved that.

I hope in the next movie they do this, they do that.

And so, yeah, that feels like quite a healthy, enjoyable version of this.

But to speak to the actual question, to Thomason's question.

Do you think Zack Snyder is comfortable with that?

Do you think actually it sort of feeds in to his brand and to the movies that he makes.

Well, as I said, it's always nice when they're not doing it to you.

Yeah.

And I've never seen him come out and say,

this is absolutely disgusting.

Don't do this in my name.

But as I also said, if something so awful happened to him in his personal life, it's probably not the number one priority is dealing with this particular aspect of something that he

to some mostly can't control.

But I think, you know, I think it's very difficult for people.

You just, anything you say to some extent just makes these things worse.

But as always, when something quite fortunate is happening in your favor, you have to really step back and think, yeah, but what's the right thing to do here?

Because otherwise, as I say, it can be just, you know, oh, well, I won't get in the way of this thing that is singing my praises to high heaven.

I've got a question for you, Richard, about Bake Off outfits from Sarah O'Day.

I hope I've said your surname right, Sarah.

She's watching the new series of Bake Off and once again find myself screaming at the television, why are the contestants always made to wear the same outfit two days in a row?

We, the audience, know it's filmed over the two days, so they could have two outfits.

Aren't they sweaty and covered in flour from the first day?

Thank you, Sarah, for that question.

I could probably answer this myself, but the lovely wardrobe mistress on House of Games and lots of other shows I do and works with lots of on lots of big entertainment shows, Sharon Smith, works on Bake Off, and she does all the costumes and wardrobe, mainly for the talent.

So because, and she is, I love Sharon to bits, but she loves having her voice out there.

She does it every time we used to do, like on pointless, if ever we did, like an East Ender special, we would do like a little pre-titles tease on the square, and it would always be Sharon walking out of a house going, Oh, Isando, I'm having your baby.

So, I knew that Sharon would be delighted to send us a voice note and tell us the exact answer to Sarah's question.

I will say this: I think in the history of this podcast, every single time someone has given us a voice note or filmed something for us, they always start by saying, hello, Marina and Richard.

I'll say this.

You can tell the sort of relationship we have that that is not how Sharon starts this, but she does have an answer to your question, Sarah.

Hello, Marina.

In answer to the question regarding bakers wearing the same outfit for two days, no, we don't try and pretend that it's all filmed over one day.

There's clear parts where we sort of say, well done, Bakers, get some rest tonight and we'll see you in the morning.

But they're kept in the same outfits pretty much because there's lots of interviews that are filmed across the two-day period.

And those interviews might be social media or they might be interviews that go into the show.

So it looks far smoother to have a one-hour show where everybody's in the same outfit rather than jumping in and out of different tops and distracting the viewer.

It's easier to keep them all in the same thing.

And they also do get messy for continuity.

If they make a mess on one day, that mess is still there the next day on their tops, unless it's something really drastic.

Our wardrobe department pretty much look after the judges and the presenters.

They don't really get too involved in the bakers unless something drastic happens.

Like, say, for example, a mixer exploded and they got completely covered in cake mix, then we would obviously go into the rescue or their button fell off or their zip broke or something like that.

But other than that, they're just kind of left to it.

They're just asked to bring nice, bright colours to wear underneath their aprons and off they go.

I hope that helps.

That does help.

Thank you so much, Sharon.

She'll be so happy to have her

voice on the podcast.

But it is that thing, Sarah, you don't, don't, please don't scream at the TV.

But if you are making a show like that, that you are, you are making so many other things these days.

You're not just filming those two days, you are filming so many clips, social media clips, all sorts of things.

Also, there might be something,

if you do an interview with someone on the first day and they say something, which actually would work perfectly on the second day, and suddenly you can't use it because they're wearing something different.

So as a producer, it doesn't make any difference to anyone that people are wearing.

different clothes, but as a producer, it just makes your life so much easier in an edit.

It also has that thing of, especially early on in a series, if you are getting to know a whole series of different people and you're not quite sure who's who, if they are wearing something distinctive,

you notice them and remember them more easily.

Whereas if they're suddenly wearing something else the next day, there's a bit of our brain in the very early parts when we're not sure who people are, where we get confused between people as well.

So it just makes everybody's life so much easier.

So if you're watching it, again, this is always the question, if it is something that makes you scream at the television and it doesn't make any sense there will always be a reason there'll be a production reason why it's easier and by all means by the way if any anything else like that crops up do ask us and we'll always be able to ask somebody if if not always sharon

but i love that i have a question here from mark and james o'morin and about the traitors ireland and they said my son and i are loving the first series of the irish version of the traitors it's really good if you haven't seen it We've noticed that the round table looks the same as the one used in the UK version of the show.

Is it the same table?

If so, how is it transported?

It is not the same table.

There we go.

That was a nice, easy one.

They made their own absolute copy because, again, on a TV crew, you are surrounded by these brilliant people who can make anything.

And it's absolutely cheaper to get one of those brilliant people to make an exact copy of something than to dismantle it in the castle up in Scotland, send it over to Ireland, dismantle it, and send it back.

So, yeah, it is not the same table, but it's

a testament to the art of set designers that it looks exactly the same.

That's a a nice, easy one.

Right, everybody, shall we now proceed to a break?

This episode is brought to you by Sky, where you can watch unmissable shows, including the final farewell of the award-winning Sky original comedy, Brassic.

Seven series later, the gang from Hawley are bowing out, still chasing schemes with full conviction.

Brassic charges through its biggest channels yet, like a group that never learned the meaning of Last Orders.

It's Chaos with a Curtain Call.

Joe Gilgan, Michelle Keegan, Dominic West, big names you might expect on three entirely different billboards, yet all improbably colliding in a northern town with more calamities than bus routes.

This time, it's old enemies resurfacing, long-lost family reappearing, and trouble following them at every turn.

But rather than an ending, it feels like a send-off true deform, messy, riotous, and impossible mistake for anyone else.

They're leaving the stage the way icons should, with a proper bang, a finale stitched together with mischief, misfits, and just enough mayhem to feel like Hawley to the end.

Watch the final farewell of Brassic Now on Sky with new episodes weekly.

Requires relevant Sky TV subscription.

Welcome back everybody, Marina.

A question for you from Darren York.

He asks, are films able to achieve box office success through a rage baiting so bad it's good?

campaign.

Is that commercially viable?

Oh good question, Darren.

In our imagination, we think that this has happened quite a lot.

But actually, normally that happens

after release.

Things become cult classics and so on, and the audience finds them and embraces them.

And they become

something that people kind of go back to.

And

they become sort of, as I say, cult classics.

Funnily enough, if you listen to our bonus episode on Rocky Horror, which isn't bad, the Rocky Horror Picture Show, but there was a significant flaw in it, if you've listened to that episode, which lent itself to audience participation, which meant that it became that sort of a cult classic.

So

every now and then you get some that are absolutely deliberate and that they lean into it.

Fewer than you'd think.

Lots of old B movies

became, you know, like sort of killer clowns from outer space, the tack of the killer tomatoes, but Sharknado, which was made by sci-fi,

that was marketed as in, even though that was, you know, relatively recent, it was marketed in the way of those old B movies.

And the tagline for that was enough said.

So that isn't, that I would say, is an instance where they definitely lent into doing it.

Now, one of the really interesting ones that people think was marketed as so bad, it was like was Snakes on a Plane.

When that came out, that was New Line Cinema.

And when that, when, when it was announced and people were like, sorry, Samuel Lynn Jackson, Al Jackson's going to be in a movie called Snakes on a Plane, you might remember it.

like it sort of blew up and it became a sort of you know a meme and everything beforehand and fans were suggesting scenes and dialogue the whole title was obviously very memeable um now so newline took the view that they were going to lean into that whole thing and they did include some of those suggested fan scenes and they did include you know and yet it lost money so that thing that you said at the end of the question richard what you're saying is it commercially do you ever really want to say that something's so bad You can code the language and kind of euphemize it.

You might want to say, don't miss the madness or see it while you still can't.

And there are films that sort of do that or everybody's talking about it.

Yeah, everybody's talking about it exactly.

But you're not.

Honestly, saying that this thing isn't very good is just like never do that.

It's really bad vibes.

So you might call it the ultimate midnight screening movie or you might do anything you can to get audience participation.

A lot of them start out like certain ones like I mean Cocaine Bear, that was, you know, everyone thought you can't make a movie called Coke.

I mean, Kerry Russell did that, but you can't make a movie called Cocaine Bear without everyone thinking this is obviously supposed to be bad.

And I'm not, you know, zombie strippers.

I'm supposed to go.

I need to go and see this because they're just making a joke about it.

Yeah, there was a movie that actually did surprisingly well, like a little tiny movie, it did surprisingly well for a horror comedy.

There was something called the Velocipaster,

which i love um and it's actually just a funny what i quite like about it is this guy this guy called brendan steer directed when he was at film school he was like either nyu or the tissue you know he was at one of those new york skip film schools and his phone

auto corrected velociraptor to velocipasta and he was like well i mean

what's that film what was that film sorry okay fine i'll make that um you know a priest travels to china he gets bitten by a radioactive artefact i've seen bits of this but i haven't seen the whole thing oh Oh, pasta, like pasta, like a

priest.

Pasta, like carbs.

And he, yeah, no, not like, not, no, not that one.

Um, harder to personify.

Anyway, and he turns into a dinosaur when he gets angry.

Um, so certain things like that, but I mean, that's a tiny little sort of you know, independent sort of student thing, really.

Um, most of them start out serious, even these things that are like unbelievably bad, like Tommy Wiso's The Room, that starts out serious.

Um, they become more popular because they can't become part of memes.

I personally don't think, as I said, shark nado is really the only one I can think of them saying, you know, enough said.

But even that isn't saying

what you're kind of saying is like, there's a tornado of sharks, right?

Come on, why would you not want to see this?

So you can code it, but you cannot say, I don't, I don't think.

It's just what you are nonetheless getting people to leave the house and pay money to see something.

You're either deliberately setting out at the beginning to do something that catches a sort of kitsch aesthetic, but once if you're doing something that isn't trying to do that, it's very hard to turn that into money.

It's difficult to turn ironic watching into money.

I couldn't agree more.

Try and make me a cult classic.

Someone tell you, you say, come on, I'm going to come up with a cult classic.

And you can have all the ingredients.

It's like someone saying to you, oh my God, I've read loads of self-help books.

I could do one of them.

You couldn't, okay, because your heart's not in it.

And you think, oh, I could do something so cynical.

It's really, it's very, very difficult in any kind of artistic project at all or even a literary project or even a self-help book to think i'm that cynical i can see all the elements of how they do this and i can produce something like that something gets in the way and you won't make something brilliant by accident but you also won't make a cult classic you'll just make you nothing will it your heart sort of has to be in it which is why the things that do become cult classics they were really definitely trying very hard and it's also also that thing of you say, oh, but me and all of my friends, we watch it, we just watch it and laugh at it.

And

so everyone I know, so this must be making money.

That mainstream culture does not do that.

There is a part of our culture, and we're absolutely part of it, that will do that and will enjoy that.

But in terms of actually making big box office, you have to find the heart of culture.

And the heart of culture does not ironically watch things.

No, you can't, you have to mean it.

I mean, obviously, within something that within a fiction, you have to mean it.

Yeah.

Oh, God, talking of cynicism, I'm so devastated to have to ask this question, Richard.

But I've got to ask you a question because Simon's written in to say, with the first anniversary of the release of Unleashed by Boris Johnson approaching, could you guys give us an update of how sales have gone and how that works commercially?

Yes, I will.

So, yeah, we talked, we worked out that his advance had been £2 million.

He was given £2 million to write this book.

And we gave a few updates on how it was selling.

But now it has settled, so we know exactly what it's, you know, it's not still selling.

So I've looked into all the numbers this week and spoken to various people, various publishers, about exactly what we think about who's made what's money.

I wish you hadn't had to do this, but carry on.

Well, it's not all good news.

It didn't do terribly.

Did not do it.

Certainly, most political memoirs absolutely disappear and it hasn't done that.

But it's a question of whether they paid Boris Johnson too much.

You'll be shocked to learn that they did.

So Boris Johnson, we know how much he's made, which is £2 million.

That's his advance.

And then it's a question of on top of that, you hope to make royalties.

So I can tell you now for a fact, he has not made royalties.

So he has not earned out that £2 million advance.

So since it came out, it sold in Hardbeck 150,000 copies, which is not terrible.

It's not great.

You saw that in a week.

Sorry.

Yeah.

it's not amazing and it's certainly not a two million pound advance level i mean it's not even close to that it's it's absurdly far away from a two million pound advance level

so he sold 150 000 copies now one of the key things in this world is is your average sale price so when you look at the nielsen ratings that'll show you how many you sold plus they will show you your average sale prices almost all books are discounted amazon will discount them quite heavily so you'll see the average sale price now the average sale price for boris's book i think the recommended retail price is 30.

The average sale price is 17.

And sometimes, again, if you see that written about in the press, they go, oh, it's half price.

And it's not.

It's put at £30 so that you can discount it and still be making money.

And £17 is actually a pretty good per-unit sale price.

You look at some of the Freedom at Fadden books that are huge at the moment, it'll have an average sale price of £4.30 or something like that.

But even for a hardback, £17 is not bad.

So you multiply multiply 17 by 150 you get somewhere around 2.5 million so the book in total has grossed 2.5 million in hardback you want to add in your audio and things like that as well let's say three and a half million it's made

the

publisher who in this case is harper collins

if a book makes 3.5 million the rough rule of thumb is once you've taken out retailers and what have you, the publisher will see back about half of that.

So they'll see back about 1.75 million.

Now, you've got to take all your costs out of that as well.

It's not like a movie, but there are substantial costs.

So maybe that takes them down to 1.3, 1.4 million, something like that.

So they have paid Boris Johnson 2 million.

I'm going to say, and this is, again, not just my numbers, but various people I talk to, maybe they've made back 1.3, 1.4 million.

So they're losing 600,000.

They still have the paperback to come.

They have overseas sales.

Neither of those are going to be enormous.

Is he big in Japan?

For this, but not so much.

Not so much.

He's not like the Velocirpasta.

Harper can say they've made money on this, but I've speaking to every single person I can from every single side of the business, no one could work out

how they have made money on it.

So we talked they they weren't serialization rights because Boris Johnson's got a you know his column with with the Daily Mail.

So over the over the

you know the lifetime of this book, it may well be that Harper Collins will be able to say we will probably

clear that to two million, but this is not a book that is kind of they were hoping to sell half a million, for example.

You well, you say it's not like a movie, but it did have a he did do a Christmas advertising campaign for this book, which I

only remember because he was writing his naughty list in this advert.

And on one of the pages, right at the top, he wrote Richard Osman

without any question, purely because of this.

He always does that.

He lets you know that he's like, why are you showing weakness, Johnson?

He should have just pretended he'd never heard us talking about you.

But

regrettably, he must have heard you analysing his book sales and

he allowed

himself to reveal himself as being very upset by it.

Oh, listen, I mean, he's right.

As I say, he's made that two million, which he doesn't have to pay back, doesn't have to pay back a penny of that.

But certainly, if he'd sold half a million, he would have made another,

what would he have made on top of that?

He would have made at least another million and a half plus every single sale of every single paperback for the rest of history.

He'd be making money on.

At the moment, anytime anyone buys this book, he is not making any more money.

So he's made a lot already, but he is not making another penny.

Harper Collins say they've made money.

I don't possibly see where they are.

I've heard this theory a number of times, but I cannot back it up.

But I say it anyway, because I've heard it from a lot of people, which is political memoirs tend to get massively overpaid for.

And I've always slightly wondered why, because you think, oh, at the end of, you know, when someone's memoir is out, they can no longer...

sort of do you any favours and HarperCollins almost always do the big political memoirs certainly for people from the right

and the thing i've heard a number of times now is that a publishing company might make a deal with a sitting politician while they're still in power for their memoirs after they're out of power and a politician knows that of the things they can cash in on when they leave power one of the big ones is a memoir that's that's one of the big sort of chunks of change that you can get you know boris knows there's this two million and if you are pre-agreeing a deal with somebody while they're still in power, then actually there is some sort of payback for you.

You know, you do actually get advantage of that person owing you a favor because they're still in power.

I'm not saying that's what happened here, by the way.

I'm not saying that Harper Connors has ever done it.

I'm not giving any specifics.

But certainly if you were to say, oh, by the way, at the point where you do leave power, shall we pre-agree that you'll get a million pounds for your memoirs or whatever it is?

And that sort of makes some sense because then you don't really have to make money out of it because

you've already got your money's worth in a a different way.

But this book has not sold terribly.

£150,000 hardbacks is a good sale if you had a half million pound advance.

You know, then everyone's laughing.

Boris Johnson's making

royalties.

HarperCollins are making money.

But if you pay somebody £2 million and you sell £150,000 hardbacks, then everybody is losing out apart from the person who was given £2 million in the first place.

I think that about wraps us up for today.

Yeah, isn't it just?

Pleasure as always.

A great pleasure.

We will return tomorrow with a really interesting bonus episode, I think, because it's about script doctoring, which is a sort of deliberately unsung part of the movie business.

But there's lots of interesting stuff about that.

People who are sort of flown in for a week just to punch things up and get paid a huge amount of money for a very small amount of time and usually have their names kept off the final script as well.

Yeah, it's fascinating.

And it always has been for like how many decades of Hollywood history.

So that's for our members if you want to join and have ad-free listening and so on it's therest is entertainment.com otherwise we will see you next Tuesday see you next Tuesday

This episode was brought to you by Sky.

Skyglass is the new television from Sky, the kind that makes your old Teddy feel like a dress rehearsal.

This is the big screen premiere right there in your living room.

Because it's not just about pixels and settings, it's about the experience.

Skyglass has Auto Adjust, which cleverly adapts to whatever you're watching.

And the built-in Dolby sound makes dialogue sharper, footsteps nearer, storms louder.

Take the secret world of sound on Sky Nature.

Frogs croak like brass sections, bats click like castanets, and even the hush between feels designed for surround sound.

It's less like nature recorded, more like nature remixed.

And then there's David Attenborough, his voice warmer than central heating, turning baby caimans and prowling hyenas into Shakespearean characters.

That's when you realise Skyglass doesn't just show TV.

It was built to collaborate with it, the unsung producer behind every great scene.

Visit sky.com.

Requires relevant Sky TV subscriptions.

Broadband recommended minimum speed, 30 megabits per second.

18 plus, UK, Channel Islands, and Isle of Man only.