WW2 British Tank Myths
Join James Holland and Al Murray as they dispel the many pervasive myths that surround the history of British tank design and procurement in WW2, showing conclusively it was often ahead of Nazi German production.
Start your free trial at patreon.com/wehaveways and unlock exclusive content and more. Enjoy livestreams, early access to podcast episodes, ad-free listening, bonus episodes, and a weekly newsletter packed with book deals and behind-the-scenes insights. Members also get priority access and discounts to live events.
A Goalhanger Production
Produced by James Regan
Exec Producer: Tony Pastor
Social: @WeHaveWaysPod
Email: wehaveways@goalhanger.com
Membership Club: patreon.com/wehaveways
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Listen and follow along
Transcript
Thank you for listening to We Have Ways of Making You Talk.
Sign up to our Patreon to receive bonus content, live streams, and our weekly newsletter with money off books and museum visits as well.
Plus, early access to all live show tickets.
That's patreon.com/slash we have ways.
This episode is brought to you by LifeLock.
It's cybersecurity awareness month, and Lifelock has tips to protect your identity.
Use strong passwords, set up multi-factor authentication, report phishing, and update the software on your devices.
And for comprehensive identity protection, let LifeLock alert you to suspicious uses of your personal information.
Lifelock also fixes identity theft, guaranteed or your money back.
Stay smart, safe, and protected with a 30-day free trial at lifelock.com slash podcast.
Terms apply.
With new gentler-scented Clorox disinfecting wipes, Clean finally smells as good as it feels on everything from lamps to ceiling fans,
even on your kids' toy shark.
Oh, ouch.
Clorox Disinfecting Wipes, now available in
ooh, crisp lemon.
Find it on Amazon.
Clorox clean feels good.
I am so excited for this spa day.
Candles lit, music on, hot tub warm and ready.
And then my chronic hives come back.
Again, in the middle of my spa day, what a wet blanket.
Looks like another spell of itchy red skin.
If you have chronic spontaneous urticaria or CSU, there is a different treatment option.
Hives during my next spa day?
Not if I can help it.
Learn more at treatmyhives.com.
Aktung, Aktung.
Welcome to We Have Ways to Make You Talk with me, Al Murray and James Holland.
Of course, Jim in the Holland bunker in Wiltshire.
Yes.
Me here in West London.
And Jim.
The other day I went to Bovington, right?
You feel very happy there, don't you?
That's your happy, one of your happiness.
I do really, really like it.
Although I also went to commemoration for the sappers lost at Cromwell Lock and I wore my red beret, my maroon beret for the first time.
How did you feel about that?
Did you feel somber or did you feel proud or did you feel somber and proud?
Somber, extremely somber.
It's a very moving occasion.
So what happened is 50 years ago, some guys from 131 Parachute Squadron, Royal Engineers, and they're commandos now.
They were TA, so reservists.
They were on an 80-mile water exercise down the Trent, 80-mile long on a weekend.
And they got to the lock at the Cromwell Lock, which is near Newark.
And the lights were out on the lock, and they didn't see the Weir.
And they went over the Weir and 10 of the guys were lost.
it's just absolutely appalling right and the ceremony was very very moving because you you know you had one guy in particular who was a you know contemporary of my father's of the colonels who came up and you know said ah colonel and saluted me which and it's the first time anyone's done that right which i found very like
did you salute back of course i did you know it wasn't a saluting occasion sort of occasion because there was the brigadier there was all sorts of people there right just a little little subtle one you know but yes i did did, yeah.
Okay, but did it, was there a moment where you thought, do I do this or not?
Yes, there was, yeah, yeah.
There was a moment where I thought, do I wear the beret or not?
And actually, driving there, and it's a two and a half hour drive up from here, all the way up.
I'm thinking, do I wear the beret?
And I thought, well, no, you're their colonel because 299, who are my squadron, are kind of the equivalent now to 131 because everyone got re-rolled and they needed some more parachute engineers and all that, or airborne deliverable people.
So these are your people now.
Yeah.
And I was very much reminded of when we were in Arnhem.
Do you remember we were in Arnhem and we went out drinking in the square in Arnhem?
And you said to me, this is your crew.
This is your tribe, these airborne people.
Yeah.
It was.
And I sort of thought, you know what?
Yes, to an extent, apart from the fact I've not done P Company.
You know, I'm not a walt here.
I'm not saying this is, you know, anything I've ever done, but I did feel that kind of resonance.
You're right, but, you know, they asked you to be their honorary colonel.
Well, exactly.
So on the drive up and thinking, well, I've got, and I brought the beret with me.
I've got to wear the beret, right?
And then I pull up and I literally arrived one car after my parents.
And dad's there in his avery coat, right?
With his beret on and a couple of medals.
And I thought, well, I've got to wear, I've got to wear the beret now.
If I've arrived with the colonel, and then he did this whole thing of after you, you are senior, of course.
Was it slightly for gritted teeth or was it with pride?
No, no, he loved it.
He loved it.
But it was, it was very, very interesting.
It was fascinating because it was about commemoration, but post-war, not our patch, not how do you think about that.
There were grown-ups there who'd, you know, or lost their fathers in this accident, right?
And they were a Scottish troop.
They were out of Glasgow.
And so there was also a commemoration in Glasgow as well to these guys.
And their officer, the guy who'd been their officer in Glasgow, so it was a troop of sappers in Glasgow.
And dad said their headquarters was in Kingsbury in northwest London near Wembley, right?
And they had a troop in Birmingham and a troop in Hull and a troop in Glasgow, as far as I remember, right?
And the Glasgow guys, he said, you know,
they were hundreds of miles away from us.
They kind of did what they wanted and they were really independent.
You can can see how that would play out, wouldn't you?
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
And, you know, they're all paratroopers and they're all, you know, young, tough lads.
And he said that it was very moving what the officer said.
He said, as he went round, because he'd recruited all these boys, as he went round to the families to console the families, he felt that actually they were consoling him as much as he was consoling them as they talked about their loss.
And it made me think of...
I remember you talking about when you were writing about the Sherid Rangers, about how, you know, the colonel's wife had basically been running this, writing to everyone and running the families at home.
And yeah, Myrtle Kellett, keeping them on track and keeping an eye on people and that pastoral care that comes with a regiment.
I was really reminded of that.
Bill talking about that on Sunday, really reminded me of that idea.
And the brigadier gets up and he talked about how, you know, it's the reserve now.
I still think of it as the TA, right?
Just because that's what we always call, what it was always called.
People forget about the Army Reserve and sometimes in the Army they're not taken particularly seriously, but you've got people who are juggling that service doing it around their lives and their families, and how complicated that can be for people, yet still they do it, yet still they show up.
And the army draws on them, particularly when they're in theater.
Now, they really draw on the reserve in a way they were never really supposed to.
That I was really struck by that.
And then at the end of it, the RSM, who's a fantastic bloke, he said, I've got to go home.
You know, we've got twins.
And my mum just said, Yeah, I remember him coming and pointing at Dad and said, He'd just come home and go to sleep, and he was no help in the house at all.
And RSM said, maybe I will have a kit.
But it was a really interesting occasion.
I was very much reminded, though, of what you'd said when we went on, and you know, this is your my tribe a bit.
It's from talking to dad and then having grown up with it around and then having read so much about airborne forces.
I do sort of feel in a strange way kind of at home with it.
But you're a champion of them as well.
But this is why we support football clubs and cricket teams and, you know, and why we have favourite regiments and favourite squadrons and favourite ships when we're starting the Second World War, because we like affiliations.
We like being part of a club.
It's why Ancient Man organized himself into a tribe, you know, on a very basic level.
And I think that that still holds, you know, and, you know, my interest in the Second World War is is richer for having that association with, in my case, the Sherwood Rangers or something, you know, or the Wessex Division.
And you've got the airborne, you know, and airborne sappers.
And I mean, it was just, it was wonderful that weekend in Arnhem.
And it was wonderful seeing you there.
You were like a pig in the proverbial.
You were very happy.
Everyone wanted a piece of you.
Everyone was talking to you but we were also talking about Arnhem.
I mean I know you'd be very happy talking about the public, but they weren't really asking about the publishing.
They were all talking about Arnhem and contemporary ops and moaning about the current army and all the rest of it.
And we were necking the beers, weren't we?
It was a great evening.
Yeah, it was fantastic.
Yeah, I also feel, because the show had raised, I now feel affiliation with the Royal Armour Corps, I have to say.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, which is where we started.
So Bovington, right?
Yeah, you had fun that day, didn't you?
Yeah, I had a lot of fun and went to film a thing about three tanks.
So the Matilda 2, the Churchill in many variants, and then the Comet, right?
And the pitch of the film, one leans into hyperbole, of course, is that the traditional stories that British tank procurement is crap, right?
We're no good at it.
We never get it right.
Well, anyone who says that obviously hasn't been in a Comet or a Cromwell.
That's all I'm saying.
Yeah, well, yeah, exactly.
And yet, when you look at the Matilda 2, You know, that's turned around in a very short period of time from when the commission to delivery within three years, and they deliver the thing and it's decisive on the battlefield and not just at arras the arras counter-attack is always wheeled out as sort of like a moment where the matilda 2 makes a difference but it's very very well encompassed and does really really well in the desert until the germans basically because of the matilda 2 wise up to using flat guns as anti-tank weapons and and switch to standing off with anti-tank weapons at greater range of the desert which of course you can do in the desert because in the desert what you're not contending with is close country which is what all these tanks have been designed for anyway and then we look to the churchill and you know the churchill gets off to a bad start, but by night, certainly by the time it arrives in Tunisia, it's ready to rock and roll.
And it's a Churchill with a six-pounder that takes out Tiger 131.
So there's your which is best top Trumps moment, if that's the way you insist on approaching tanks.
Churchill wins in that encounter.
And then the Comet at the end of the war, which is like a complete, totally the complete package.
And basically, it's a kind of centurion in waiting.
It's a Cromwell rebooted and it's a centurion in waiting.
And, you know, tanky opinion.
Yes, it's that perfect blend, isn't it?
It's like if if if it had two parents that's what it would come out as yeah cool i can i can really see both your parents in you
well it's interesting because so we looked at this and the interesting thing about the comet is it actually it is essentially the box in the center of it and what the suspension is it's a cromwell and so retraining the crews they only really have to retrain them on the gun because it's a different piece of ordnance but the driving the rest of it is all exactly the same as the cromwell so when crews are converting to the comet i mean it's interesting because when the battle of the bulge happens they're taken out their training on comets and they're put back into cromwells but it's a bit it's a bigger chassis isn't it it's slightly bigger there's the core box is the same but with a 17 pounder with not a 17 pounder so it's a new gun 76.2 millimeter gun it's not a 17 pounder the projectile the warhead is from the 17 pounder right so it can do armor piercing discarding sabot Exactly.
But the case is from a three inch gun.
And they build a new gun, they re-bore a barrel, but they call it a 77mm or a short 17-pounder because they don't want yet another piece of ordnance that's a 76mm gun on their inventory.
It's interesting because at the tank museum, they said, we've got to admit, it's us.
who got this wrong a while a long time ago and said it was a 17 pounder it's not it's a completely it was a completely new adapted piece of ordnance for the comet it's a very good looking tank, isn't it?
It's a very good looking tank.
And that gun can also fire a higher explosive round in a way that the 17 powder couldn't quite set the high explosive round with the 17 powder wasn't up to much.
Comet's the full package.
But what's really interesting is here you have three tanks, right?
Tanks can only be born of doctrine, right?
Because you make a tank to suit the doctrine you've arrived at, right?
And then they can only really be born of what engineering is capable of and then what money people are prepared to invest in it.
And then the engineering is tied up with who has experience in building what.
And so, what is so fascinating?
And I got right into this because I thought, why is there this sudden bloom of excellent British types?
Because the Cromwell is a really great cruiser tank.
There's no two ways about it.
For the Great Swan, it's entirely suited to that.
It's so manoeuvrable.
I know I said this before, but that time I went driving in a Cromwell, it is breathtaking, not only its speed, the speed with which it can move from a starting position in forward or reverse.
And it can do a 360 degrees on a sixpence.
It's absolutely incredible.
And its braking speed is really quick.
It's just like you're hurtling through this forest.
Suddenly it'll stop and it's like, boom.
It's like, oh my God.
I mean, it's unlike anything else.
Well, and it's built to the doctrine.
That's where you have to start.
The doctrine they've, in the interwar years, there's this bifurcation.
There's the idea is an infantry tank and a cruiser tank.
The infantry tank is to support the infantry firing on fixed positions.
You know, once you've got across the trenches or whatever, which is explains why the Churchill is so long, right?
Once you've done that, then the cruiser tank comes through the gap you've made and he gets into the enemy's rear and smashes up the rear and then you encircle and destroy, right?
So these tanks are built to deliver to doctrine.
The doctrine is what's leading the argument for the type you end up with.
So if you look at a Matilda and go, well, it can't do this or it can't do that, it's not very fast.
No,
it's not meant to be.
So, so what, right?
whereas what it's meant to be is very well the crew are meant to be very well protected it's about survivability and the two pounder when that when it's delivered is the best anti-tank weapon in the world right so it's got the best anti-tank weapon in the world and the crew extremely well protected you know what else what else is required from this tank right what is really really interesting is in the interwar years the development of a tank industry because after all there's no money money's going to the navy steel is going to the navy you need steel so who's keeping this thing going so you've got the cardinal lloyd designs which are sir john carden and his partner and vickers are building tanks commercially for the rest of the world there's restrictions from the government on who they can sell them to but they're selling them into india to belgium britain is the leading armaments exporter in the world in the early 1930s exactly and the army might not be buying any tanks but vickers are making and selling them all over the world so there is a there is a repository of expertise at Vickers, and Vickers are being tickled along by the government to keep this expertise going.
And because it's commercial models, you get people saying, well, the suspension doesn't work and Vickers have to fix it.
There's this very peculiar thing bubbling under in the 20s.
That's why when the universal carrier basically appears, it doesn't really change for the rest of the war because that's along the lines of the tankette, the light vehicles that Vickers have been churning out in the interwar years to complete everyone's satisfaction and they've had 20 years to fine-tune and get it right.
Whereas the Matilda, for instance, is from this standing star essentially.
And of course, and we've talked about it in the Battle of Britain series, you get this moment where the British government goes, okay, air is our, after the Navy, the air defence of Britain is our absolute strategic priority.
We don't need tanks.
We're not going to need them.
The French are churning them out in large numbers.
We'll need them eventually, but they're not really very important.
And so when people say, oh, the British tanks are crap at the start of the Second World War, well, yes, because the British are meeting their strategic requirement as they've assessed it through industry, through doctrine, given what they think the war is going to be like.
So the Matilda is actually what you're going to get if that's your thinking and is also best in show.
It's the best tank in 1940, 1941 in the world.
No two ways about it.
The doctrine might not be right, which is why the tank might not be able to deal with a German blitzkrieg, perhaps.
But the tank in itself matches the doctrine of the engineering.
And what is so interesting is you get this burst of innovation around tank design right at the end of the 30s, where suddenly the taps are on.
There's a bit more money.
They know they're going to need some tanks once air has been paid for.
Production Council come in 1940.
When the war comes, the Production Council says, right, there's one A and there's one B, and one A is things we've absolutely got to have now.
And air is 1A right tanks go to 1B further down the list and you even get a moment where Churchill says to Beaverbrook you know if it comes to a choice between hampering air production and tank production I would sacrifice the tank so when people say oh you know the British are crap at tank production well no because they're prioritizing other things Their strategic priorities are what they are.
Even after the fall of France, your strategic priority, or especially after the fall of France, your strategic priority for now has to be be air, right?
I think the whole story of, like, say, looking at, you know, some of the cruiser tanks that are produced in sort of 41, 42, that they're using in Greece in 1941, for instance, which those terrible, terrible tanks with lots of Vickers guns in it, or Covenanter.
You look at those types, they're the product of a different way of looking at war because you're expecting to find a different, fight a different war, but you've laid down the tracks of industry.
You can't turn them around easily.
If you look at at one tank type and go, oh, look, tank procurement's rubbish, you've got the wrong end of the stick.
Well, that was because David Fletcher, who was David Willey's predecessor at the Tank Museum, he wrote the Great British Tank Scandal.
Yeah.
The Great Tank Scandal.
And, you know, he was very down on it, wasn't he?
But I suppose he's a product of that age where everyone was down on the British war effort.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I mean, the whole point was we were rubbish.
We were kind of, you know, and we were high band because we couldn't have big turrets because it had to fit on the loading gauge of the railways.
And, you know, because our platforms are higher therefore you can't have anything wider than the wagon and you know that goes back to the celts or something and chariot width or something i mean it was just you know but that really held sway for a long time but i think largely because it fitted with the narrative that britain was just a bit rubbish in the war well and you you can argue that right but then what you can also argue is that the british they spend all this time trying to figure out basically which engine to put in the tanks and to deliver enough horsepower what you really want is a meteor and when they finally settle on that and they get production of the meteor away from the air ministry and the ministry of supply take over, then you get this very interesting moment where they go, right, okay, we're settling on these three types that we're going to build, Cromwell, Comet and Centurion, and they will come online at the various stages in the campaign.
We'll be able to turn down production by the end of 1944.
And we're expecting the war to end on the 31st of March 1945.
And by the autumn of 44,
they're thinking ahead to how do you carry on manufacturing tanks safely, keep jobs going, but also how do you turn back to civilian production with those factories?
Those are the things that are guiding how these types are built and developed.
We'll take a quick break and we'll come back.
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Commercial Insurance.
Business owners meet Progressive Insurance.
They make it easy to get discounts on commercial auto insurance and find coverages to grow with your business.
Quote in as little as eight minutes at progressivecommercial.com.
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, coverage provided and serviced by affiliated and third-party insurers.
Discounts and coverage selections not available in all states or situations.
Hi, it's Garen Lineker here and I want to tell you about a fantastic new quiz book from Goalhanger, the team behind the Smash Hip podcast.
The rest is entertainment, the rest is history, the rest is politics, the the rest is classified and of course the rest is football the rest is quiz is packed with over 1000 brilliant questions to test your trivia knowledge against your friends and family and from 1st of october to the 31st you'll be able to pre-order a copy from waterstones for half price using the code rest2025 rest 2025
capital R that is pre-order your copy of the REST is quiz by Goalhanger from Waterstone using the code REST with a capital R2025.
Now,
welcome back to Weird Ways and Make You Talk.
We're getting deep into tank stuff.
The thing is, is the tanks from 1942 are the product of your priorities before the fall of France, right?
This is the thing.
Before the fall of France, tanks are the penultimate priority in your procurement.
Navy first, Air Force second, Cinderella service, the army last is how it goes.
And then tanks lower down than that because
you're expecting to hold the Germans.
Because who needs tanks anyway?
Because who needs tanks anyway?
The other thing is the Germans are also prioritising their industry in different ways according to their different strategic requirements.
They're fighting a war.
They're then caught out by the success of Blitzkrieg itself, if it even exists.
These are the things to bear in, the factors to bear in mind.
Plus also, no one builds tanks before the war apart from Vickers.
There's a shadow factory set up to go with the Vickers factory.
Can't deliver because no one's learned how to do it yet.
Well, it's not like the Germans are building a whole load of them.
Half their tanks are coming from Czechoslovakia when they start the Blitzkrieg, for example.
Exactly.
That's one good reason to get your hands on Czechoslovakia, isn't it?
It's because they build lots of tanks that are arguably as good or better.
Yeah, I mean, I mean, there's T-35s, what are they called?
The T-35s.
The T-36s, aren't they?
The Romot.
With the a big crystal suspension, yeah.
Here's 7th Panzer Division.
And, you know, they're not building a huge number.
And, you know, their Panzer 1 is six foot high and has got a brace of machine guns.
It was rubbish.
Yeah.
I mean, and if you look at German procurement in contrast, you know, with the Battle of Britain, the Blitz, helping out the Italians and in the Balkans, the Luftwaffe goes into Barbarossa smaller than in May 1940, than the start of Falk Elbe, because they've got their own procurement priorities wrong and fought a different war to the one they were expecting to fight, right?
But no one goes, oh, the great German aircraft scandal.
They don't view it like that, do they?
No, I mean, it does seem odd, doesn't it?
Because the Matilda is absolutely perfect for the age in which it's operating at the start of the war.
But I mean, there's no point in us building lots and lots of tanks if the Americans are building them in their zillions and there's plenty of them.
I mean, there it is.
Why would you?
It makes no sense at all.
Let's concentrate on something that the Americans can't provide us and that we can provide the Americans, such as six-pounders, for example.
Yeah.
You know, I just don't, I don't, I don't really get this and this whole idea that it's kind of, you know, we're constantly begging from the Americans and it's all lend-lease.
I mean, it's that's not how it works.
Well, the War Office with its tank boards, they form these tank boards which have people from industry as well as soldiers on.
And there's the tank parliaments that Churchill sort of holds.
And what you end up with at the tank parliaments is basically all the armor division guys have been absolutely nailed by the guy running the Rod Arm Corps.
And so they just sit and agree with everything he says at the meetings and they get nothing out of those.
But the tank boards have got people from industry at them who are able to say, well, we can do this or we can't do that.
This is what we're capable of in terms of production.
And the conclusion is they reach this conclusion that basically we need the horsepower we need to deliver the right amount of armor and the heavier weapon.
And the minute you put a 17-pounder in something or a bigger gun, it's heavier.
So you need more horsepower.
And the Liberty engine, which goes into the Centaur, which is the thing just before the Cromwell, which is basically a Cromwell, but not with the meteor in it, that the engine's unreliable and also it's made abroad.
And they want control of the number of engines they're making that they can provide.
The Merlin is like, by this stage, it's essentially cheap as chips.
It's easy to make.
They're really good at making it.
Got the machine tools, got the workforce, know how to do it.
Exactly.
And they know it works with the chassis.
They know that that's the chassis they're going to then stick with that style.
And they know it will fit on a train and all this sort of thing.
And it's because of the Sherman, because of the Sherman, that can go, well, we'll buy Shermans until those are ready.
And that's not the British unable to make a tank.
That's them having the luxury of a much bigger integrated industrial system.
We're not on our own is the other thing, by the time they're making these decisions.
The British tank industry sits within the Allied system.
And I think you've got to come away from the looking at the Covenant and going, well, that's a dog.
You know, because in the background as well, you have the development of the Valentine, which is over 7,000 made, right?
And which people train on.
And the other thing to remember is so much of this is about preparing for Normandy, preparing for the really big showdown in Normandy.
And there's a whole, there's a part of the British Army that does, all it does for four years is train in Britain.
So it's going to go through several tank types until the tank types mature.
And they know that they need the tank types to mature for the summer of or the spring of 1944.
You know, that's why you have Valentine DDs, because they're getting their heads around the concept.
And yet the Valentine is seen as
not a success story, but it is a success.
You don't make 7,000 of something if you don't think it's working for you.
It's the fact it's in the background, it's used for training more than anything else.
I just think this all needs reframing.
Yeah, I agree with that.
I agree with that.
I think people have just been looking at it the wrong way, haven't they?
And what about things like sort of quality of steel and stuff?
Because there's been quite a lot of chat about that in the last year or so.
So you're saying that, you know, German steel quality
goes down.
And so you might have a King Tiger, but actually it's 120 millimeter millimeter steel is worth a 90 millimeter of steel on a british tank or something yeah you get into that the british are well ahead of everyone else before the war and this is down to people like oliver littleton isn't it yes that's right but you have manufacturers like vulcan foundry who make trains and they build them they build the matilda too they're giving the matilda too and they've got this steel called hycro hycro
how do you how do you spell that H-Y-K-R-O is a tank armor.
And that's the English Steel Corporation, who are a subsidiary of Vickers, by the way.
And it's an alloy cast iron, and it's got nickel, chromium, molybdenum.
So they're using that in the engine cylinder liners, right?
So your engine steel is better.
It's not just the armor.
It's the whole thing.
And you want a tougher engine that will survive.
Well, cylinders are always a weak point.
Exactly.
They get worn down.
And that's when you get the gaps in the rings and stuff.
And then it burns more oil and, you know, the performance goes down and so on because the compression's not as good.
Yeah, exactly.
So this molybdenum, chromium, molybdenum steel, hycro doesn't flake when it's struck, or is less prone to flaking than other armoured steel.
Soviet tank crews in the defense of Moscow in 1941 basically say, we love the Matilda 2 because the steel doesn't flake.
The turret, which is cast on the Matilda 2, which is an amazing effort, amazing thing to have done,
doesn't flake when it's struck by a high-velocity projectile.
in the way that the turret of the T-34 shatters because British steel is that much better than soviet steel all that innovation is going on that's all pre-war and you know ford motor company are also they're also experimenting with steel alloys and are figuring out better ways to you know cast irons that are easier to mould and easier to easier to cast you know that's all been going on during the 30s so once the british have figured out what the doctrine is what the tank is to go with the doctrine and then how to build it once they do that they deliver cromwell comet and Centurion.
And in fact, Churchill, because the thing about the Churchill is by the time they ironed out the problems with the design, which is, you know, rushed out.
But the Churchill's designed for the job, isn't it?
I mean, yeah, exactly.
It's doctrine.
Doctrine leads.
So maybe the doctrine's wrong, but the doctrine is perfectly good if you think your strategic effort is going to be fought in a First World War style by holding the Germans fixed positions, walking speed, and then a cruiser tank, you know, to exploit.
But one of the problems they find, of course, is that because you're producing two different types, this is one of the issues that's thrown up by having an infantry tank and a cruiser tank.
The one factory can't help the other.
You can't pull expertise across the board, which is why in the end, the main battle tank, which is a single type in the form of a centurion, is where you end up going.
But by the time they've done that, they've abandoned the rail gauge loading.
They've abandoned the Bailey Bridge 40-ton limit.
They've abandoned the things that are set before the war.
because they've decided war is different now.
Yeah, we should just explain the whole thing about the Bailey Bridge is that the Bailey Bridge is the standard class of the most common, easiest Bailey Bridge.
Well, the lighter they are, the easier to get across.
But the standard one, which is suitable for tank and armor, is the Class 40.
And a Class 40 can take 40 tons.
So if your tank is 30 tons, that's fine.
It's also 30 tons with a bit of extra plus crew, plus extra logs on the side and, you know, whatever.
You're still within the limit.
Anything bigger than 40 tons, you've got a problem, which is why, you know, going forward a lot, it's very difficult to justify a Pershing or, you know, something equivalent like a tiger or something, because you're not going to get across the bridges.
Yeah, exactly.
Exactly.
By 1944, you know, there's 2,223 meteor tanks produced.
But you're also buying Shermans to meet the shortfall because
you don't need to build things.
So it's not that we can't build them.
It's that we don't need to.
We don't need to, because we can use our factories to build other stuff.
Because we need to build other stuff.
You know, we'll license some products to the Americans to make.
Well, and also
we need to keep the US Armed Forces in supply with 31% of their total supplies in the ETO, European Theatre of Operations.
Often forgotten.
Exactly.
So you've got 2,223 Meteor engine tanks are produced, 1,062 Churchills, 280 Valentines produced for Soviet requirements.
That's what's left of the Valentine offer to the Soviets in 1944.
Then you've also got some light bits and pieces, and then 4,102 tank adaptations, which is the Firefly, the DD tanks, and that's 3,000 of those, 3,266 are on Shermans because we'll use the chassis.
We'll use the Shermans because we've got them.
The British tank effort,
industrial effort will be, well, we'll take a Sherman, we'll adapt it and we'll turn it into what we want, which doesn't say to me that British tank production is kind of like a headless chicken that doesn't know what it's doing.
Well, it can't be because if it can adapt a Sherman tank, then you've got the werewithal and the kit and the industry and the machine tools to be able to make that happen in numbers.
Yeah.
It's absolutely fascinating.
Yeah.
But what happens though, at the, you know, at the end of 1944 is they realize they haven't bought enough.
They haven't planned ahead enough and they start to run out of tanks.
Both the Americans and the British thinking, ah, shit, actually, we thought the war was going to end sooner.
Yeah.
We've talked about this for that moment after Overlord where it should have ended.
By any reasonable stretch of the imagination, the Germans should be throwing in the towel and they're not.
And so you end up with shortfalls in ammunition and shortfalls in, and the supply end of things can't keep up with the advance because the Germans should have quit.
Amazing.
You then have the opposite problem, which is they're then all geared up for the war going on into 1946 because of the Japanese, and it doesn't.
It's all over in August.
And they're not ready for it.
They're not ready for the sudden, dramatic end of the war in August.
That then produces all sorts of problems, particularly in the USA, where they haven't been winding, they've been winding up their production again, and they suddenly have to stop it.
Yeah.
The thing is, the American industry, what it's been able to do is incredible.
You know, the M3, Chrysler, produce a pilot of that seven months after it's commissioned the first production bubble 11 months after it's first commissioned i mean amazing it's amazing why would you go oh you know we need to do what we need to do well they're doing it for us because it's an integrated industrial view of things rather than britain on its own well yeah and it's also it's an integrated military effort isn't it that's the whole point of coalition warfare yeah yeah yeah yeah and if the if the americans can give you 20 000 shermans you'll take them right 100 yeah but you're also telling me about all these grants that are left over we can do better than the grant we've got Sherman.
Once the Sherman's online, there's 4,000 grants.
Like,
it's amazing.
The sheer scale of it.
Yeah.
The interesting thing is you've got to place British tank production in the context of the pre-war expectations, which are a repeat of the First World War.
And when you look at the Churchill, which is the product of that thinking, and the Matilda 2.
then they completely meet the requirement of that strategic thinking.
And then when you look at
what you're going to try to do next,
then the Sherman meets that requirement.
So you don't need to do it.
And then the Cromwell comes in because you're also trying to keep industrial policy is so important in assessing these things.
Just as you talk about how the Bren gun uses less steel than an MG42 to produce, this is what's going on in tank production, that kind of thinking.
Well, yes.
I mean, you know, the production of weapons is never just sort of, you know, has it got a big gun and, you know, what does it look like?
There's a whole, whole, there's so many factors going into it.
And, you know, whether it be a German machine gun or whether it be a British tank, I mean, you know,
and one is being too narrow-minded if you think of it only in those terms.
You know, there's a whole host of things in your access to those materials, you know.
Doctrine, industry, industry's ability to engineer the thing that the doctrine requires.
And then the end user who's the soldier going, why is this tank so slow?
Well, because the doctrine
back.
No.
Anyway, I hope you've enjoyed enjoyed that
piece of war waffle digression, everybody.
Very much.
Yeah, that's brilliant.
It's tons still to learn.
That's the bottom line.
There's tons still to learn or just other ways to think about it.
Yeah, if you think about things in a different way, that's an exciting thing.
Yeah, it is, yeah.
And you've had to plow through an incredibly dense book to get to that, but well done for doing so.
Good because your much more easily accessible regurgitation has proved very effective, I think.
Thanks, Jim.
That's the service we aim to provide, right?
Well, coming soon, Malta.
The siege of Malta, isn't that right, Jim?
Yes.
Siege of Malta.
One of my start points in the Second World War.
So I'm very excited about this one.
That noble island fortress in the heart of the Mediterranean.
That's right.
And if you like your drama surface hot, then the siege of Malta is exactly the place to get it.
Yeah, and there's heroes and villains and eventually Spitfires, submarines, and Force K and amazing gunners and a George Cross, of course, and civilians.
So it's got everything.
Heroic convoys.
Well, thanks everyone for listening.
We'll see you all very soon.
Cheerio.
Cheerio.