Replay | Donald Trump Runs the Military & The Role of Militias | Jordan Klepper Fingers the Conspiracy

It's back-to-school season, and Clorox is donating 2 million disinfecting wipes to classrooms across America.

Because back-to-school means things can get a little bit messy.

Just ask kindergarten teacher Miss Gibson.

Give me just one Clorox wipe, and I'm ready for glitter glue, exploded lunchbox yogurt, peanut butter handprints, runny noses, picking noses, rubbing noses.

Touching noses.

Thank you, Edward.

Ooh, nap mats, and lockers, and tissue boxes, and scissors.

Clorox disinfecting wipes. Teacher's number one wipe.
Clean feels good. Based on unit sales data.
The roses were living the dream. To you, my darling.
No, to you. Until it all came crashing down.
You got fired. Quiet.
On August 29th. Stop.
You stop. And see the roses.
Rated R. In theaters everywhere, August 29th.
At Bright Horizons, infants discover first steps. Toddlers discover independence.
And preschoolers discover bold ideas. Our dedicated teachers and discovery-driven curriculum nurture curiosity, inspire creativity, and build blasting confidence so your child is ready to take on the world.

Come visit one of our Bright Horizons centers in the Bay Area and see for yourself how we turn wonder into wisdom.

Schedule your visit today at brighthorizons.com.

You're listening to Comedy Central.

It's been two years since Donald Trump lost the 2020 election.

And although a stubbornly high number of Republicans still don't believe he lost,

they are at least coming around to the reality that he is no longer the president.

Who is running the government right now?

President Trump.

Well, most of them are.

For some, the truth is just too much to bear.

I found this out firsthand when I was told at a MAGA rally that Trump is still in charge of the military. He's running the government.
And the military. And he's running the military.
So we should blame him for what happened in Afghanistan. No.
Thank you for talking to me, George. Enjoy seeing President, current President Trump.
It makes me think of that famous courtroom quote from A Few Good Men. You can't handle the truth.
Although, if you think about it, that's a quote from Colonel Nathan R. Jessup, who,

as a member of the military, if logic follows, still reports to Donald Trump. Damn it.
Checkmate it again. This is Jordan Klepper, Figures the Conspiracy, and today we're talking about the military.
The Trump is still in charge of the military conspiracy theory. It's just one of many military-related conspiracy theories.
And we have two people here with us today who know a lot about them and the people who believe them, both outside and inside military ranks. They are Paul Zoldra, a veteran who covers military issues and is the editor of the weekly newsletter The Ruck that focuses on national security and defense.
And we're also joined by Dr. Amy Cooter of Middlebury College, who has studied and spent time with militia groups

like the Oath Keepers. Guys, welcome aboard.
Nice to be here.

Thank you for having me. Good to have you guys.
All right, Paul, I want to start here. Help us

understand the logic behind the theory that Donald Trump is still in charge of the military. I mean,

even with Ivanka bailing on the campaign, I'm not even convinced he's in charge of his family anymore. Walk us through this.
How is he in charge of the military? Well, Jordan, he's the commander-in-chief still. He didn't lose the election.
I mean, didn't you read that? That's how it works. If you believe it, you can achieve it and or convince a bunch of other people you have achieved it.
It seems wild. So why do people actually think this?

It really boils down to his – a lot of his supporters believe that he did not lose the election.

And that's kind of coming into an interesting part where he's running for reelection now, even though he didn't lose the last election. But even still, yeah, he's the commander in chief.
And so if he's still the president of the United States, then he's still the commander in chief and he still has has poll in the military. And, um, and, and, oh, by the way, um, a whole bunch of the military is, is, is supportive of Trump and, and we'll, we'll, you know, go with his every word.
I hope the sarcasm is coming through. I under, I, I can hear some of the sarcasm in there.
I guess what helped me walk through a little bit of, this sounds, it sounds ridiculous, but it's not the only time I've heard this out and about. I know people are denying the idea that Donald Trump lost the election, but there are people who still believe, okay, he lost and Biden is in charge, but that there is something going on that we cannot see where Donald Trump is in charge of the military apparatus.
Can you speak to that mindset? I know it's not true, but speak to the mindset. Where does something like that come from? Why are there people who are grasping onto this? Is there like a military idea that there is some sort of shadow general, shadow leader? What draws people to this other than the inability to let go of the idea that Trump is still president? Well, I think it would come, I think primarily you look back to the QAnon conspiracy of there's this big, massive underground lizard galaxy of Democrats and celebrities stealing children and doing all kinds of stuff.
And that all came from a person calling himself Q. you know many people became became convinced by this whole idea of getting really highly classified information inside the government.
And the idea was at that time was Q was inside. You know, it was supportive of the Trump administration and fighting back against the the so-called deep state that is trying to thwart his agenda.
And so if you think that, if you can believe that, that there's some person inside the government who's not only sharing all this really highly classified information with the public on a message board, I don't see much separation. I don't see how we go from that to believing that Trump is still president.
That's not that wacky when you think about it. I think what always makes me laugh within it, though, is the belief in the fun parts, the wearing of the uniform and the stars and the power, but none of the accountability of what has happened.
You know, we discuss the critical things that people are critical of the Afghanistan withdrawal and the person that I talked to very clearly was like, no, no, he had nothing to do with that. It's almost as if, you know, in military parlance, you have a dress uniform, correct? I'm not somebody who was in the military, but I've definitely watched films that are about the military.
And I'm to understand that you have a dress uniform. And you also, as an infantryman, you were in the Marines, correct? Correct, yes.
You also have something you might wear functionally to go do dirtier, more applicable things, right? Camouflage. Yes.
Camo. I knew it.
Camo. I've done all the research.
And it's as if believing in this theory is a belief that you only get to wear your dress whites and that there is no secondary part to it all, which is sort of emblematic of the whole American thought process. I think you actually bring up a really good point, which is a lot of these conspiracy theories, they hinge on people's ignorance of the military.
Less than 1% of Americans serve in the military. It's a very small number.
During World War II, we had about 10 percent of Americans serve in the military. Like it's a very small number.
During World War II, we had about 10% of Americans in the military. Of course, we're fighting a gigantic war and that makes sense.
But that number is so much smaller now. And so what I've found from, you know, just reporting on these issues for the past decade, being in the Marine Corps before that, most people have no idea how the military works.
I think a lot of people think that we just march around, we salute, and then they like press a button, break glass, you go to war and like there's a black box in there.

Nobody really understands what it's actually like.

And the thing is that most of it's really boring.

We're just sitting around waiting to do things.

We're doing maintenance or other kinds of stuff. But those are less sexy parts of the military that the military itself doesn't really share all that much with the public.

And, you know, that ignorance really feeds these ideas, you know, that the military is, you know, doing nefarious things and, you know, they're up to no good. And also the idea that the military can do these amazing things with ease, you know, like the Benghazi attack could have just been stopped just easily by the military just swooping in there with jets from Italy and stuff like that.
it takes more planning and actually, you know,

diving in and figuring out how to actually do things.

It's like, it's almost like a comic book caricature

of the military is what you get from a lot of Americans

who just, you know, don't really know any better.

So you're telling me, even if you've played Call of Duty, that's not enough information to fully understand how the military works. I mean, the Call of Duty is realistic for combat experience-ish.
See, I do. Enough said.
Enough said. Enough said.
Much like if you've watched Wag the Dog, you understand American politics as well. That and maybe half of American president, you get it.
You know how this thing works. Now you should talk about it and fear the institutions in and of themselves.
If Call of Duty was more realistic, there would be soldiers sitting around really bored, you know, smoking cigarettes, you know, really, you know, bitching about their chain of command and complaining about, you know, going out on patrol that day. Like, that's the more realistic version of combat operations.
The joke is, like, you know, combat is 90 or 1% sheer terror and 99% boredom. Right.
And that usually is pretty accurate. Yeah, so like bitching and moaning is a part of the military.
So play your call of duty, but then make sure you watch a good season of Curb Your Enthusiasm to get the full understanding. Right.
I knew it. I knew it.
I want to actually fill out this. We're talking about the military here, but sort of our conversation today is going to fold in also the worlds of militias and citizen militias.
So I want to bring Amy in. Amy, a lot of these conspiracy theories, they become incoherent the further you look into them.
But I want to talk about what you've studied, citizen militias. Can you define for our audience what is a militia compared to what being in the military is? And also as somebody who's studied, who's talked about militias, I'm curious if you have a militia codename.
Because I do. And it's Cold Brew, and it got me a lot of cred with the Georgia State Militia.
Does everybody here get a cool nickname? Yes, sir. If you don't have one, we'll help get one for you.
Could I be Cold Brew?? Or if that's taken, a French press? Cold brew works better, I think. You like that? Yes, sir.
Feels very bold yet smooth finish. Well, to start with your first question, U.S.
domestic militias are civilian militias. They are intended to exist outside the military, outside the National Guard.
And their members are people who really see it as their personal civic duty to kind of act in concert in some ways with the military, to be almost a civilian line of defense against potentially invasion, potentially natural disasters, anything in between. A lot of the members actually have military training.
Among the groups I studied, about two-thirds of the leaders and about one-third of the other members had some service experience. And many of the others who did not kind of felt like they had missed out.
They had wanted to be in the service, but didn't qualify medically, or for some other reason, didn't get that service. And this was almost like a surrogate for them.
Their experiences were really about trying to, in their view, stand up for their country, defend the Constitution, and the American way of life in terms of how they specifically defined it. And as to a codename, do you have a codename? Some of them actually did call me renegade because I would study them at a time when it was not really popular for liberal academics to be dealing with more conservative topics.
Well, I will say this. I was talking with Amy offline a little bit about this, but I read Amy's dissertation years ago because I'm fascinated about militias.
I'm from Michigan, which if you're into militias, Michigan's a great place to be. We got some OG militia action happening there.
And I think what is fascinating about it is there's a lot of talk about the effects of militias and extremist groups recently, but you've been doing this for quite some time right now. What a lot of people I don't think look into is what is appealing about militias, the process of militias and the average militia goer.
I think what I noticed with some of the time that I spent with a few militia members, I spent some time with some Oath Keepers recently, just hanging out, having fun, watching mailboxes, trying to save the election. And I hung out with some folks in Georgia way back when.
And I think the military side of it is fascinating because there are some of those people, Oath Keepers in particular, who are ex-military folks, ex-cops, who see it as an extension of their service. They made an oath to this country and to the Constitution, and this is their extension of it.
There are other folks, too, who feel like just day players who wanted to be in the military, and perhaps some had very interesting stories about an inability to get into the military. Like, you had an astigmatism, so now you want to be in the militia, it's good enough.
Okay, fine, I get it. Seeing a lot of cosplay here.
There's military here, and then there's a lot of these people who are pretending to be military here. You know how you know? Because they don't have badges, they just have notes from their wife that says, you can go for the weekend and hang out with your friends, but be back on time.

But there's this funny balance of people wanting to serve, people pretending to serve. And I guess I'm curious, too, of how you see that aligned with their relationships to the two actual military forces.
Do you often see it as in concert with the American military system?

Or is oftentimes some of these militias looking to... Did you find, do you often see it as in concert with the American military system?

Or is oftentimes some of these militias looking to act in case the military in and of itself is something that turns on the American people? Yeah, the relationship that militias have with the military is frankly quite complicated. It's something that they tend to like in the abstract, in theory, at least because they believe that military and national defense are kind of the primary functions of what the federal government is supposed to do.
It's one of the few legitimate functions of the federal government from their perspective. But they think that in practice, the military is prone to corruption or other problems that they see as being kind of endemic to the

government as a whole. So it tends to be the case, and there can be variation across units or even

across sometimes individual militia members, but it tends to be the case that they really honor and

revere veterans and service members themselves, but have a lot of distrust for the military as

an institution, have a lot of distrust for military military as an institution have a lot of distrust for military leadership paul does that go both ways you you know the military world and those circles what is the feeling for those in service when they look at the modern militia movement there's military people in the militias but also there are those people who are kind of uh you know, we kind of call it stolen valor.

If you're trying to kind of, you know, represent yourself as as part of the military, you know, and, you know, like some people will do it a whole lot, you know, throwing medals on their chest and stuff like that. others will just kind of pretend and wear the gear and you know there's like there's air softers

and stuff that wear all the gear.

They look very military and represent themselves as if, you know, like, hey, I get get your thank you for your service free meal at Denny's or something.

But I I think I think, you know, military members probably looking at the militia, they think they're a bunch of geeks. Like get a job.
If you want to join the military, then join the military. It just looks like this kind of pretend defense thing.
And it really ignores the reality of military operations and what the US military is capable know, if you're looking at a militia, if you're in a militia and, uh, you're, you're there, you know, you're training to, uh, defend the constitution, whatever that, that, that idea they think they are doing. Um, but you know, bottom line is, is they're also thinking about potentially going up against the US military.
And that's not a winning battle. Guys with small arms aren't going to really do much against an army with drones and missiles and all kinds of stuff.
And so it seems a little bit lopsided. But I think also they tap into the military legitimacy of wearing a uniform and looking like you're organized and, you know, following some sort of chain of command.
These are these are military concepts and they they make you look, you know, more professional. And that's the reason why they seek out military members and veterans, because that lends them credibility and legitimacy among among their their followers and Even if you're some nerd who could never get into the military, well, you can at least join the militia and be close to former military members and it kind of brushes off on you.
You are spilling that tea spilling that tea on that militia well also i do think it also plays off of also the public perspective of the military there's as as a civilian i think there is a general misunderstanding of the ranks and the difficulties and the world of the military and so somebody purportporting to be a militia member who wears the outfits, talks the talk in a public setting is almost treated as a person with law enforcement bona fides or has put in the time. It's like if you buy enough T-shirts with flags on them and you have good enough posture, then liberal elites like myself are going to let you get on a plane before them and they're not going to say anything about it so you can you can steal enough valor to get you in certain positions um it's it's interesting i uh i'm curious amy we talk about some of the some perhaps of the goofier sides of that uh and the desire to be more legitimate like the military.
But you look at something like January 6th, and you have militia members, oath keepers, proud boys, people who are storming the Capitol with a legitimate fear that the military in and of itself could be utilized against them. The one thing you couldn't help but notice was just how many people looked like they were preparing for battle.
From the tactical vest to the pitchforks, this rally felt charged. You can tell these people really love America by the number of weapons they brought to hurt other Americans.
Where does a theory like that come from? And how do they get to that point?

Well, you know, I think it can come from a few different places. But among some of the specific groups that I have spent time with, it's come in part from an interesting dynamic where everything that Paul just described is true, that there are these folks who really want to attach on to the military sort of aura, if you will, and try to kind of claim some of that legitimacy.
But also, there are veterans who actively seek out something

like a militia to join. And that can be for one of two reasons.
One reason is that they kind of

miss the camaraderie of the military, they've been honorably discharged, and they want to find a space where people are trying to look up to them and learn from some of their experiences. On the other hand, I've encountered some folks who really did not enjoy their military experience, to say the least.
They really felt like there was no legitimate purpose to some of the conflicts they were involved in. One man in particular, for example, really believes that Desert Storm was truly all about experimentation on service members, that there was no other legitimate purpose for it.
He came back incredibly angry and told me that he wanted to join something like a militia as a way to figure out how to fight back against the government to take a proactive stand against the government. So I think some of that kind of mentality kind of seeps in there, where even some people who have direct military experience kind of feed those narratives that the military might be the enemy.
And usually that narrative is not about the rank and file, but again, about the leadership or about the government, and then they're misleading the rank and file, and they're doing all this nefarious stuff that most military or service members may not even be aware is happening.

So they feel like it's their job to raise awareness of that, to fight back against it.

In some ways, that's the logic that kind of undergirds the Oath Keepers as an organization as a whole, because their whole purpose was supposedly to remind military and law enforcement about the oaths that they took to serve the people as opposed to serving the government. I want to talk a little bit about that distrust there.
Paul, you've written and you've been very critical of some of the conspiracy theories that have been perpetrated by Donald Trump. You've called him America's crazy uncle because of these conspiracies that he has spread, including one that claims Joe Biden killed SEAL Team 6 to cover up the reality that Osama bin Laden was never shot, and it was a body double, which is wild, but it was something that he pushed out there.
What is the story behind that one? So this one is very, very strange and weird. And it's worth noting right away that Rob O'Neill, the SEAL Team 6 member who claimed to have shot Bin Laden, he's credited with killing bin Laden on that raid.
He was, and he's also a big fan of Donald Trump, but even he was like, whoa, bro, can you kind of back this off a little bit and push back on this theory? It goes back to the SEAL Team 6 raid on Osama bin Laden. This happened in 2011.

The SEALs went into Pakistan. They raided bin Laden's house.
They killed him, and they took his body back. They got a ton of intelligence for it.
It was a very successful operation by all kinds of measures. Soon after that, I'd say maybe within months or so, there was a helicopter crash in Afghanistan.
And a large number, unfortunately, of Navy SEALs were in that crash. And this helicopter call sign was extortion 17.
And the theory of extortion 17 going down was that these were SEALs that were involved in the bin Laden raid. And in order to keep them silent, to make sure that nothing and nothing about the bin Laden raid that the government didn't want getting out, Obama killed them, made the helicopter crash somehow, and that it was a cover-up of the bin Laden raid.
And now we see that this is sort of refashioned into, well, actually, no, it was the vice president at the time, Joe Biden. And he was the one who set down this helicopter for some reason.
And it just doesn't make any sense. And it also makes very little sense if the government is trying to suppress SEALs from revealing the truth.
And why is Rob O'Neill still alive? Why is Matt Bissonette, who wrote a book about the entire raid, two SEALs have revealed details of this. And yet the government wanted to take down a helicopter and bring down the truth.
It's totally ludicrous and really, really unfortunate. The thing about these conspiracy theories that people forget is that these were SEALs that went down in a helicopter crash.
There's a pilot. There are pilots in this crash, army pilots.
They all have families. They have friends and they are now, I'm sure, affected by this conspiracy theory nonsense., whenever there's some kind of new article coming out about the Extortion 17 cover-up, it's, you know, it's, if that were, if that were my loved one that, that was lost, I'd be pretty pissed off by, by this stuff.
And it just continues and, and kind of snowballs and, and, you know, one conspiracy theorist cites the other conspiracy theorist. And it kind of, you know, goes on and on.
Trump was challenged on this one by Savannah Guthrie during the 2020 election at a town hall. Just this week, you retweeted to your 87 million followers a conspiracy theory that Joe Biden orchestrated to have SEAL Team Six, the Navy SEAL Team Six, killed to cover up the fake death of bin Laden.
Now, why would you send a lie like that to your followers? You retweeted it. That was a retweet.
That was an opinion of somebody. And that was a retweet.
I'll put it out there. People can decide for themselves.
How do you think members of the military react when they see a conspiracy theory like this? Probably like, what the hell? Like, why are people believing this crap? Like, that would be my initial reaction. Like, can we teach some more critical thinking skills in school? I look at these kinds of things and I think like we are a society with a whole lot of people that are fooled by misinformation, disinformation.

And what I fear is nation states using that to their advantage. And I'm talking about China and Russia.
That is not a conspiracy theory that these nations do this. They have substantial intelligence apparatuses.
They have information warfare specialists just as we do. And they have budgets that support this stuff.
And so if you have a society that's already, you know, not even able to discern fact from fiction because you have a former American president, you know, throwing fuel on that fire, that's going to be used to the advantage of China and Russia. And it's not propaganda that's like, you know, like so obvious that it's, you know, it's like suddenly you're going to see some message that says like, you know, Vladimir Putin is the greatest leader of all time.
It's, it's more about egging these things on and, and sort of adding more fuel to the fire and more BS to actually expand the amount of people who are confused about what the truth is, um, or just questioning, questioning complete, you know, reality of what's going on. And, you know, there's examples of this stuff in like, like Jade Helm, uh, there was an operation in Texas, uh, this training exercise in which, uh, a huge number of conspiracy theorists, you know, started talking about Jade Helm as some kind of government takeover.
The military was going to take over the entire United States and this training exercise was some kind of cover. Of course, it was bogus and ludicrous, but that's like our internal conspiracy stuff.
Just imagine if that expands, that goes out, and you have China sharing this stuff. That actually happened with Jade Helm, right? Jade Helm specifically, didn't Governor Abbott in Texas put troops, activated troops because of that conspiracy? And China activated bots to gin up more chaos around it because they saw that as a weakness, right? It was, what you're describing is our susceptibility to conspiracies is a legitimate vulnerability to our own national security.
I want to pause it right there. I want to talk a little bit more about Jade Helm after the break.
We'll be right back. Introducing the new Volvo XC90.
With seven-seat versatility, Google built-in, and advanced safety features for all your precious cargo. The new Volvo XC90, designed for life.
Visit volvocars.com slash us to learn more. Summer's here, bringing sunshine, road trips, beach days, and sweat.

Without the right underwear, things get uncomfortable fast.

That's where MeUndies comes in.

Made with unbelievably soft, breathable, micromodal fabric,

MeUndies helps you stay cool, even when the temperature's not.

From briefs to boxers, cheeky cuts to bralettes, MeUndies has it all.

To score sizzling summer deals like up to 50% off, go to MeUndies.com slash Spotify and enter promo code Spotify. Running a business comes with a lot of what-ifs, but luckily there's a simple answer to them.
Shopify. It's the commerce platform behind millions of businesses, including Thrive Cosmetics and Momofuku, and it'll help you with everything you need.
From website design and marketing to boosting sales and expanding operations, Shopify can get the job done and make your dream a reality. Turn those what-ifs into...
Sign up for your $1 per month trial at shopify.com slash special offer. Paul, we were talking a little bit about Jade Helm.
Technically, what is it? Jade Helm 15? I don't know. I don't know what number we're on of the times that Jade Helm has led to the collapse of the government.
I know sometimes they throw a number on there. It sounds, so much of these conspiracies, they have to sound somewhere between a Bourne Identity movie and an exotic dancer.
If you can get that right there in the middle, then it's going to catch fire. And Jade Helm was one of those, correct? The thing is that that's crazy about the Jade Helm conspiracy is that you had a whole lot of people who are thinking that this was some kind of government takeover.
The military was planning some kind of coup.

And the governor of Texas actually had troops from the National Guard activated and kind of keeping an eye on Jade Helm activities. Which is – it's just wild to think about that you have straight up BS actually affecting policymakers and moving them to action.
This is, I mean, part of it is probably, I'd imagine there's some kind of politics at play where the governor is trying to kind of pretend like he's doing something about this problem. But I would really hope instead that you would say, hey, this is nutty.
This makes no sense. And this isn't happening.
And I don't actually waste National Guardsmen's time sending them out to take care of this. But it's not like outside the realm of possibility to think about these types of conspiracies or just simple misinformation, disinformation.
The people that are making national security decisions, policy decisions, movements in the military, they're susceptible to this information just like anybody else. And some of them have training on these types of things.
Some understand counterintelligence and information warfare. But a lot of them don't.
You know, they they're like, they're just like every other American, you know, and they, you know, so if, you know, where, where you come from in America, that's, that's your, your neighbors are, some of them are in the military and they're still getting the same information that you're doing on Facebook. You know, they're still looking at it too.
Oh no, don't say it. Don't say that.
I mean, yeah, you're saying our susceptibility to conspiracies is a vulnerability at a national security level, especially when people in positions of power buy into this shit, right? Are we handing out stars too easily in the military? I look at, I mean, General Flynn, I don't know. General seems like a pretty big position.
And General Flynn now, he believes in all the QAnon nonsense, he believes that the Democratic Party is all demonic Satan worshippers. This man was a general.
And from all the movies I've watched, that's like tip top, if I recall. So what's going on there? Are we not vetting our generals enough? Or is this just what an America general looks like right now? Bat shit crazy.
Well, to be fair, he is not the first bat shit crazy general that the U.S. military has ever had.
If you look back- Well, is that a problem? I guess, you know what? Is that a problem too? Because I think that brings up a larger question, right? The military in and of itself, we put the military on a pedestal and rightfully so, they protect our country and keep us safe. And yet there's this American ideal of the wild general who goes on in there, Custer with all of his crazy dogs and what have you.
From the beginning, there's stories of generals who let reality be damned and that makes them heroes. But is that a myth that is starting to erode and hurt us in modern day warfare? Well, I think it's just generally a mistake to put people high up know, high up military leaders, military members in general on a pedestal.
You know, we should respect and honor the US military and service members who, you know, swear an oath to the constitution and raise their right hand to do so. That is something that most people don't do.
And the vast majority of them do so honorably. Then there's people like Michael Flynn who rise up in the ranks and go places up there.
And the thing about Flynn is that he was a very widely respected intel guy. He's credited with really sort of transforming the intelligence world.
And on that sort of reputation, he moved up the ranks and he was eventually part of – or the leader of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

It's like the military's version of the CIA. And they deal with gathering intelligence on foreign militaries.
And at that point, there's a really famous Washington Post article about Flynn's time at DIA and after.

And one of the quotes that I found really fascinating is some of his subordinates started talking about his sharing of what were called Flynn facts, which were basically ideas, crazy sounding ideas that he would put out there and try to get the intelligence to sort of molding to his ideas. So for example, he would say something like, there's definitely like an Iraq connection to this thing, or the the Iranians are behind this or something.
And it's like, that's not actually how you're supposed to start with intelligence. You're supposed to like, like, you don't want to find the bad guy.
You're telling me this, one of the architects of the Iraq war, like the idea of, oh, there's weapons of mass destruction over here. Let's go invade this country.
That's not a good starting point for good, clean intel. You actually want to have a starting point of being open to being wrong.
But the military doesn't create that, right? Does the military create those types of people? It seems like that is a vulnerability in a modern military, right? You were a soldier. Were there any classes on, were there any improv classes about being wrong and saying yes and to any other idea? Yes and no.
The thing about that article that you know know, really sticks out to me is that you don't rise to this position without other people seeing warning signs along the way. And the thing about the military, you know, it's sometimes it is easier to pass the problem off to someone else than deal with it right now.
You know, it's the federal government. And so it's hard to fire somebody, especially hard to get rid of somebody out of the military.
And how do you get rid of somebody from the military who's, you know, a little like saying some weird stuff? Like, what is how do you put that in the performance review and justify it? You know? And so he, he, he and others have, have sort of moved up into higher up ranks. And, and now we're kind of seeing the consequences of that where, you know, it's not Michael Flynn anymore.
You know, it's General Flynn. It's all over his Twitter.
It's, you know, he introduced himself so much as General Flynn. And yeah, I get it.
You know, if you're a retired general, sure, you want to maintain the respect and, you know, kind of the dignity of that rank. But I'm not walking around, you know, telling everybody I'm Sergeant Zoldra, you know, like it's, it's a, it's a way to, uh, you know, get more legitimacy to your ideas.
And it's, it's people here, a Lieutenant General, a former Lieutenant General, or a former Colonel. Um, There are, you know, there's there's lieutenant colonels out there that are sharing conspiracies that I've found.
And and people hear these because and they they believe it because he's a general. Why would a general lie to me? You know, generals are very honorable and they they they tell us the truth and they've been there.
He's been in for a really long time. And so, of course, he's telling us the truth about the, you know, the Kraken being released and, you know, the colonel telling us that the Green Berets have found mail-in ballots at some secret facility in Europe that should have gone to Trump.
You know, of course that's true because they're a colonel. I think there's a secondary level of stolen valor that exists with folks like Trump who takes somebody like a General Flynn and they use his title as a way to bolster their own BS in a way that gives them credibility just because they're hiding behind the shield of somebody with a title like that.

But that's a whole different, that's an editorial I'm working on.

I want to talk about some of these real life examples of theories and ideas that get put

into action.

I want to talk about the Wolverine Watchmen.

They're a splinter group of the Michigan Liberty Militia, and they're the guys who wanted to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. I want to know a little bit about the story behind them and how they plotted to do exactly that.
Yeah, I mean, I think the main thing to know with them is that they have been stirred up by this broader milieu that we've been talking about, where conspiracism about a variety of things, but especially about COVID-19 was kind of at the forefront of their motivation. For them, it seems that they really believed that the lockdown efforts in Michigan and perhaps some that were being discussed nationally were really interpreted as government tyranny.
They felt like it was going to slip into further tyranny, that that was just kind of the beginning of telling citizens what they could and could not do, and seem to believe that it was their personal responsibility to do something about that. And I think to Paul's earlier point, part of the reason this kind of conspiratorial thinking is damaging to our national security is not just what it can potentially open up internationally, but how it creates divisive content even among Americans.
It's been really interesting to observe the militia movement over a long period of time, because folks that I was watching in 2008, 2009, 2010, who were very skeptical of some conspiracy theories, who openly laughed at some of them that people kind of assumed were part and parcel of the militia movement, got turned on to more and more of them, especially during Trump's administration, especially as QAnon theories sort of spread across the internet and especially on places like Facebook. And so I think that the idea that some people have special knowledge or special insights into the way the world really works is a major variable creating some of this divisiveness and potentially creating the ability for some people to get so wrapped up in it that they feel like they have to commit violence to do something to course correct our culture here.
I think that's a great point. There's something special about feeling like you have that secret information.
And that's something you can sort of build an identity around. It makes you feel like you have a sense of purpose.
I guess the time that you've spent with militias talking to militia members, what is something that people don't understand about the modern militia movement that you noticed? I think probably the major thing is that most militia members are average people. They're really not social outliers.
They have families, they have jobs. Militia activity is something that they care very much about, but they're not necessarily just centering their entire life around it in the way that we sort of stereotypically portray.
And I think we have ignored that at our peril, because something that I've been trying to get people to understand for a long time is that much of what they believe politically, ideologically, and other ways too, is very similar to what a lot of middle America believes, at least a lot of white middle America. And I think that I kind of anticipated where we would go with the Trump election campaign and beyond in ways that took a lot of people by surprise, because we sort of dismiss militia ideology as fringe when actually they've just been a little bit louder and more comfortable with it in terms of sort of owning it really when it's been something that's been shared among a broader swath of the population really forever but what do you say to somebody who hears militia and they're like oh those are white nationalists uh far-right extremists how do you respond to that? How far off are they with that assessment? You know, those elements do overlap, but I think that that's overly simplistic in a way that makes us downplay what real white nationalism is, makes us kind of miss opportunities for intervention potentially with people who aren't that extreme, people who could potentially be talked out of in some ways, at least, their conspiratorial thinking and some of that divisiveness as well.
If we sort of paint them all with one brush, it is more of a bleak picture than I think what we really have. We're going to take a short break.
When we come back, we'll talk about what's next for military extremism here in the United States. you can teach your kids financial literacy skills like earning, saving, and investing.
And this investment costs less than that after-school treat. Start prioritizing their financial education and future today with a risk-free trial at greenlight.com slash Spotify.
greenlight.com slash Spotify. Mint is still $15 a month for premium wireless.
And if you haven't made the switch yet, here are 15 reasons why you should. One, it's $15 a month.
Two, seriously, it's $15 a month. Three, no big contracts.
Four, I use it. Five, my mom uses it.
Are you playing me off? That's what's happening, right? Okay. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch.
Upfront payment of $45 for three-month plan, $15 per month equivalent required. New customer offer first three months only.
Then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra.
See mintmobile.com.

Prime delivery is fast.

How fast are we talking?

We're talking puzzle toys and look pad delivered so fast you can get this puppy under control.

Fast.

We're talking chew toys at your door without really waiting fast.

P-pads, cooling mat, and peg hem.

Fast and fast.

And those training T-R-E-A-T-S.

Faster than eight to six. Fast.

And now we can all relax and order these matching hoodies to get cozy and cute fast. Fast free delivery.
It's on Prime. Amy, groups like the Oath Keepers have been emboldened by extremists in the Republican Party supporting them, but also hit with the realities of court sentences because of their role in January 6th.
What's next for groups like the Oath Keepers? Yeah, I think probably with the Oath Keepers specifically that they are done as we know them. It's kind of interesting because the Oath Keepers have always had a bit of a mixed reputation within the broader militia world.
Some people sort of appreciated

what Stuart Rhodes and some of the other members were trying to do in terms of prioritizing

oaths to civilians, basically. Whereas others thought that Rhodes was too big for his britches

and speaking beyond what he was really able to do so based off of his own experiences and based off

of how he kind of excluded some other longstanding militia organizations when he was first starting. So personally, I think that the trials and everything that's going to follow from that is going to be pretty devastating to the Oath Keepers as we have known them.
But that doesn't mean that the underlying ideology has gone away. Many groups that have previously affiliated as Oath Keepers have just changed their name or taken down their Facebook pages or their other websites.
And they still very much believe that the election was stolen, that it is their personal responsibility to do something to prevent the next presidential election from being stolen. So I think headed into 2024, we're going to have to be incredibly cautious and keep an eye on the narratives that develop, that as Trump continues his next campaign, as other people sort of try to out-Trump him, we may see other figures even rise to the forefront in terms of their ability to appeal to these groups, to make them feel like their fears are legitimate.

Paul, I'm curious how we talk to people in the military, people in citizen militias. You served in the military.
You served with white supremacists who had Nazi tattoos. How do you talk to someone like that about their beliefs? I wish I had a good answer for this, but it's

it's terribly difficult. You brought up a point about the Nazi tattoo.
I joined the Marine Corps and, you know, after 9-11 and, you know, got to my first unit and, you know, after 9-11 and, um, you know, got to my first unit and, um, you know, one of my, one of my senior, senior Marines, uh, you know, was a little bit higher in rank than, than me. And he, you know, they, they were in charge and I was the junior guy.
And, um, I didn't know what it was at the time, but he had some, he had some kind of like Heil Hitler kind of coded tattoo, um, on his arm. And, and it's, you know, having a person like that in your unit, um, is, is incredibly dangerous.
Uh, first and foremost, you know, it can sow discord among a close unit. You know, the thing in the Marine Corps that we talk about is a spree de corps, this sense of, you know, working together.
And you're very, very close. And so, and we're also serving with, you know, black, you know, I got black grunts in my platoon.
I've got people from Puerto Rico and Dominican Republic and Mexico. Like it's all – it's just everybody.
It's a mixed bag. It's all of America.
and you have one person who basically hates a portion of your platoon. It kind of like makes you wonder, are they going to do the right thing in combat? Will they protect the people that they don't like? you know it they don't like, you know, it's there's that fear.

But but also it's it's it's the fear of of stealing weapons, stealing ammunition. And militias have done this many times in the past.
There's plenty of examples of using military members who are parts of militias or parts of these kind of extremist groups. And they basically use their military access to supply them with guns and ammunition.
It's also really concerning from an intelligence standpoint to have someone like that whose loyalty is maybe not with 100% with the unit and with the military. When you have this dual loyalty to a militia group or some extremist group outside of the military, it's right for the defense department to wonder, what are these people doing? And it's a real problem because once you're inside, you're largely trusted.
You've made it through the basic training. You maybe have gone through some kind of security clearance or, you know, but you're trusted.
People aren't, you know, skeptical of you or pushing back on you as much as they would a civilian, you know, that's outside of this military sphere. And it's, you know, it's the supposed – it's called an insider threat.
And the military takes that very seriously when it comes to like cybersecurity. There's insider threat, you know, software and things like that.
But there's not a lot to do for the insider threat the guy like me, who's joining the platoon and like, this is my senior Marine. I couldn't, you know, if I knew what that tattoo was at the time, like, how do I report that? What am I supposed to tell people? Like, it shouldn't be a hard or difficult decision to get rid of, uh, you know, what I think is a scumbag.
You know, like, but that's, it's not always that easy. Is the military ripe for conspiratorial thinking? An institution that relies on loyalty, but also blind faith can be hijacked by charisma and power to have people follow.
I think the stat was something like 15% of the folks charged on January 6th were a part of the military at some point. Does that number surprise you? Not really.
I think it goes back to what I said before, which is the military is a reflection of society. The people in the military, they're not better or worse than the rest of America.
They just have all the guns. They just have all the guns and tanks.
They should be better. Shouldn't that be the goal? The people with the tanks and the guns should be better than all of us.
They should be smarter. They should have the research, more discipline, more loyal.
Dear God, I hope the people with the tanks are better than me. They must be.
They have to be. Look, Jordan, you're a dirtbag, so I'm sure they're better than you.
Thank you. That makes me feel better.
Thank you. But for seriously, I think it's, it's, they're just like you and I, um, and they're just as susceptible to this stuff.
And, and I, I still, I mean, just the other day I had a, a friend of mine, um, you know, sharing something on, on Instagram, like something about, um, funding for, for the Ukraine war the Ukraine war and how it's way too much. The Biden administration is wasting all our money and sending $90 billion to this war and he could be spending it elsewhere.
And he was sharing it in a positive manner, like, oh my God, this is crazy. And it totally makes sense if you see that.
Like, oh, that's screwed up. And I looked at it.
It's one of those things, and this happens a lot. It's like it's too good to check.
And a lot of these things are just too good to check. And I looked and I check because I care about this person as I served with.

And I looked it up.

It took me like basically five seconds to find the Congressional Research Service Report, which is a nonpartisan outlet and looking up Ukraine funding. And it's right around $19 billion.
It's like a rounding error on the Department of Defense budget. It's like the bang for our buck that we're getting in

security, in U.S. security and protecting Americans from a competitor of ours, Russia, that has been a competitor of ours for a very long time and will be a competitor of ours for a very long time, that spending is so small.
But looking it up, I'm like, hey, here's the actual thing. And he's like, oh, thank you.
But some people I've done that to and they get pissed at me. They're really mad that I'm not buying in to the conspiracy theory it's like – it's hard to – it's really hard to push back on something like this when it's – you've bought in so much to the idea that there's some kind of nefarious thing, you're closing off your mind to alternatives.
And it's just people, it almost becomes kind of religious. I think you should host some sort of Facebook class because that may be the only positive experience of people pushing back with an alternative point of view that was greeted with a thank you in any kind of social media.
Very impressive. It was in the DMs.
So I think we're nicer in the DMs. If it's on the comments, I get unfriended.
Maybe that's what it is. This is slide into the DMs and give facts.

That's what people need to do.

It's about time.

I actually do think that that is something we need to do.

And more people should do that. You know, it's really, it really is like, it is a bit, it's a bit of a bummer to see like just these conspiracies flourish and then there's nobody that's like saying like here's the actual reality.
And I will try my best if I think I might have a shot at correcting the record you know, correcting the record for at least one other person. Um, and, and really that's, that's the, that's the point for me, you know, it's like, it's like, yeah, you're not going to impact the entire world.
You're not going to push back on, on this, this conspiracy mindset. Um, and you know, just this, the crazy amount of misinformation, no one person is going to be able to, to, to stop that all, but one person can have impact on one other person, you know, like, and that's, that's, that's worthwhile.
I was going to say that I agree with that too. I mean, there's this academic research that talks about this backlash effect, where if we factually correct conspiracy theories, people just kind of dig further into them.
And I think that can be true in some circumstances, although I think it's just a little bit too pessimistic for me to believe that must be true always across the board. But if nothing else, especially in sort of those more public forums, when we say, no, here's factual information, here's why the logic of this is wrong, I think at the very least, it can prevent other people from slipping into that kind of thinking as well.
That it might be a backstop too. You might not save that person.
Leave that man behind. That's a military concept, right? That's a lost cause.
That person, too bad. But maybe you can throw something down and they won't come rushing back in.

Amy, I want to ask finally what you expect to happen over the next few years with the citizen militia movement. Yeah, you know, I always say I wish I had a crystal ball because there are so many variables right now that it's difficult to know for sure what's going to happen.
But I expect it's likely that we will have a resurgence once more, not just of militias, but of those groups that we tend to label right wing across the board, headed into the 2024 cycle, because I think that there are multiple political actors who now have learned how to play into the fears of these groups in an instrumental kind of way and who see them as something that they can weaponize for their own benefit. So I expect that we will see pockets of resistance.
I don't think we'll see another January 6th. I think this is going to continue to be more about school boards and supposedly like culture war, right, type issues.
But it's really about sort of who has a voice in culture, who has a voice in politics in a way that will absolutely show up in many of our campaign speeches and what that election cycle is at least framed to be about, which I believe they're going to frame it to be more about sort of like the soul of America in a way that's going to be very appealing to a lot of these groups and galvanizing them into action. You hear that, America? The weapon of the future.
It's us. We are being weaponized.
Our susceptibilities are free thinking. We are being we are being weaponized.
Well, thank you, guys. Thank you to Paul.
Thank you to Amy for joining us here today. You're listening to Jordan Klepper, Fingers the Conspiracy, we'll see you next week.
Listen to Jordan Klepper,

Fingers the Conspiracy from The Daily Show

on Apple Podcasts, the

iHeartRadio app, or wherever you

get your podcasts.

Explore more shows from The Daily

Show Podcast Universe by searching

The Daily Show, wherever you get your

podcasts. Watch The Daily

Show weeknights at 11, 10 Central on Comedy Central and stream full episodes anytime on Paramount+. This has been a Comedy Central podcast.
At Bright Horizons, infants discover first steps, toddlers discover independence, and preschoolers discover bold ideas. Our dedicated teachers and discovery-driven curriculum nurture curiosity, inspire creativity, and build lasting confidence so your child is ready to take on the world.
Come visit one of our Bright Horizons centers in the Bay Area and see for yourself how we turn wonder into wisdom. Schedule your visit today at brighthorizons.com.
At Bright Horizons, infants discover first steps, toddlers discover independence, and preschoolers discover bold ideas. Our dedicated teachers and discovery-driven curriculum nurture curiosity, inspire creativity, and build lasting confidence so your child is ready to take

on the world. Come visit one of our Bright Horizons centers in the Bay Area and see for yourself how

we turn wonder into wisdom. Schedule your visit today at brighthorizons.com.