Best of the Program | Guest: State Sen. Tammy Nichols | 6/30/23

ABC Wednesdays, the Golden Bachelor is all new.

Hi, Mel.

Hello.

Former NFL star Mel Owens is looking for his second chance at love.

I'm hopeful that I'll find true love.

But these women are in a league of their own.

Mel has never been exposed to women like us.

I don't know how he can handle it all.

The Golden Bachelor season premiere.

To love, happiness, and fun.

Wednesdays, 9-8 Central on ABC, and stream on Hulu.

Hey, make sure to check out the pilot episode of my brand new podcast, Honest History.

The episode's titled Control Freaks, the Scientific Roots of Progressive Tyranny.

It's available right now wherever you get your podcast.

Great podcast today.

We have a huge announcement from John Irwin, who is part of Angel Studios, on something

that I think you're really going to like.

A new series is being launched, and it was launched on today's show about the founders.

You're going to love that.

Also, we go through the court cases from the Supreme Court this week and so much more all on the podcast, which begins after this quick message for Jace Medical.

Jace Medical, they have been working to get antibiotics into your hands in case you go on vacation or there's an emergency.

The Jace case gives you five of the most common antibiotics and you can use them and have them on hand in case something comes up.

I just was in London, happened to have the antibiotics because I have a Jace case and we brought it with us.

My son needed antibiotics, I needed antibiotic, and then when we got home, we checked with the doctor and we were already past whatever it was that we had.

The next thing that Jace has done is they have made a way for you to get a year's worth of your prescription drugs just in case of catastrophic breakdown of some sort.

You need your heart medicine or your

mental health medicine,

your medicine to keep you alive if you happen to need

injections because you're diabetic.

Whatever it is that you need, they'll help you with that and get a year's worth at your home.

I want you to visit Jace Medical.

It's j-as-e medical.com.

Jacemedical.com.

you're listening to the best of the blend back program

so pat um affirmative action yesterday um

if if i know my history And I'm pretty good at it,

and I know what Martin Luther King was all about, Yesterday would have been a very, very good day.

Yes.

But apparently the left is upset.

Very.

Let me read you this tweet from Erica Marsh.

She tweeted out.

Oh, boy, it's not from a racist, is it?

Oh, no.

Okay.

This is a person who supports people of color, Glenn.

Okay, okay, good, good.

She tweeted, today's Supreme Court decision is a direct attack on black people.

No black person will will be able to succeed in a merit-based system,

which is exactly why affirmative action-based programs were needed.

Today's decision is a travesty.

No black person will be able to succeed in a merit-based system?

Wow.

Wow, what a racist.

I think blood is coming out of my eyes.

Did you see the James Bond movie with the guy in Casino Royale?

He kept had, he would,

when he get really upset, the blood would come out of his tear ducts.

It's actually shooting out of my eyes.

That seems

a little racist.

Yeah.

To say that

no black person

could get into college

on merit.

Is that amazing?

You know what it seems like?

It seems almost like the early American, very 20th century early early American progressive that thought that blacks were kind of subhuman and really

were really somebody that we should dispose of because they're useless.

Which is why.

Kind of sounds like that.

Which is why Margaret Sanger, who was one of those progressives,

came up with a great idea of Planned Parenthood so that they could eliminate the undesirables before they were even born.

And we don't have to worry about that.

Let me tell you.

you're only saying that because of the writings of Margaret Sanger, where she said, don't tell the black pastors that we're trying to get rid of all blacks.

Right.

That's the only reason I'm saying it.

I'm only saying it because it's true.

So,

you know,

I know that's my fault.

I apologize for that.

I'm sorry.

America is not used to hearing truth anymore, and we're sorry to break it to you, but that's some of the things that we have for you.

By the way, I just did a podcast on what's called the Red Pill Room that is part of the

tour here for history.

We have millions and millions, tens of millions of dollars worth of American artifacts, and I love it when people say, You know, you're just, you're just, you're just trying to make the Republicans look good.

No,

we start the red pill room with Theodore Roosevelt.

And he was a Republican and a progressive.

And he thought, you know, we don't take our cattle and just let them breed with any other cow.

We decide who they can breed with.

And that's what we should do with humans.

In fact, we didn't have a blood test.

We didn't have a marriage license until that kind of thinking happened.

And Origin of the Species, which said there are subhumans, people that aren't fully baked, and it was codified.

But follow the science.

Follow the science.

This is exactly the kind of thinking, and we're returning to it.

And the people who say they're for civil rights, you know, I swear to you, I've got to do this.

I just don't...

I just don't have any time.

But I'm telling you, my gut screams this to me, that the great society, you can't take Johnson, who was the guy who stopped the Civil Rights Act in 1959,

and then by 1964, have him the champion of civil rights.

It makes no sense.

The guy was an extraordinary racist till the day he dropped dead.

And all of the...

Everything that was done in great society crippled the black family and the black man, crippled it, broke the family up.

Black families had a better record of staying together in 1963 than white families did.

By a lot.

Now look at it.

Yeah.

By a lot.

I'm telling you.

It turned around almost exactly because it was...

I think 80 or 85% of black families had the father in the home.

Now

it's 73% don't.

So it's an amazing turnaround.

And why?

And why?

And why?

It was because the great society rewarded families that didn't have a father.

So it encouraged fathers to leave the home.

Black fathers.

These people, I really truly believe, they didn't change their spot.

How do you go from, we want to kill all black people?

to,

hey, let's help them out in four years.

And then every single one of your policies cripples people that are black, cripples them, enslaves them.

And then you come out and say some of the most racist stuff I've heard to date.

You know, blacks will never amount to anything unless we let them in without merit.

Oh my gosh.

gosh yeah

and did you see the ratios at harvard for instance?

It's just one of the schools that have these ratios, but the admittance rate for blacks up until now was 58% at Harvard.

So 58% of blacks who apply to Harvard get into Harvard.

It was 35% for Hispanics.

I'm not looking at it right in front of me, but I think the white

number was 18%.

And for Asians, 13 or 14%.

So

I don't know if you know this, and a lot of people will be shocked by this, but I'm not Asian.

And

even though I'm not Asian,

I have no problem with Asians beating my children in a race to Harvard.

Asians have a work ethic.

Generally speaking, I don't want to be racist.

Generally speaking, they have a work ethic and an education ethic that whites don't have.

Nobody has.

They happen to.

And Indians are very much the same.

They come over here, they work really hard.

I don't know about you, but when I look up from the operating table as they're putting the mask over my face, I don't want to see the guy who's like, yeah,

I didn't pass any of the tests, but I got into medical school.

And then count back to 10.

No, no, no.

I want the most qualified person.

When I drive over a bridge, I don't care the color of the person's skin that designed it.

I want to make sure they were the best in their class.

I want to make sure they didn't just slip in because of their color.

Well, what is so racist about that?

It makes no sense.

We will never go to space again if we just take people who are not qualified and

move them to the top and give them the education and the most qualified not give the education.

And I don't care what color you are.

And by the way, I apologize for saying we went to space.

We'll never go to space again.

We clearly never went to space.

That was Hollywood.

That was definitely Hollywood.

You're listening to the best of the Glendeck program.

So while the rest of the world yesterday was talking about affirmative action,

Joe Biden was right on point

talking about abortion.

And his point of view is

interesting,

but he's speaking...

He's speaking from the standpoint of a very devout Catholic.

That's the thing.

When I say very

devout Catholic, I think maybe the kind of Catholic that runs the Vatican Bank.

Other than that, probably not so Catholic.

Here's what he said yesterday.

So I'm, you know, I happen to be a practicing Catholic.

I'm not big on abortion, but guess what?

Roe v.

Wade got it right.

Really?

Oh, yeah.

I bet the Pope feels that.

Although this Pope might.

i don't i don't know i don't know uh roe v wade cut in a place where the vast majority of religions have reached an agreement historically the first three months or thereabouts in all major religions was that's between a woman and her doctor

can i tell you how many times have you read jesus man

That's between you and your doctor.

Want to kill a baby?

Three months, first three months, I'm going to give it to you.

Whatever.

I mean, what's your doctor say?

Yeah.

Did you counsel with your doctor?

Because in that eventuality, whatever you want to do is

you could counsel with God.

He might have another opinion, but don't.

First three months.

Yeah.

We've all made an agreement.

He goes on.

The next three months is between, I mean,

just a woman and her family.

So I guess that's.

Just a woman and her family.

Yeah, the doctor's been cut out of that arrangement, I guess, now.

He does not use the word cut out.

Oh, that's a good point.

Yeah.

Yeah.

The next three months.

So we're up to the third trimester nine months.

Third trimester now.

The next three months is between a woman and her doctor.

So it goes back to forget the family.

Now you're back to listening to your doctor.

And then

the last three months.

Now we're up to a year.

We're up to a year.

The last three months have to be negotiated because you can't, unless you're in a position where your physical health is at stake, you can't do it.

So that's, if you're a year pregnant, you may not terminate this.

So if you are carrying a child at 12 months,

you can't do it.

You can't do it.

You can't do it.

You can't do an abortion ever.

Unless your health is at stake.

So if you have like tuberculosis and a three-month-old, you can kill the child.

Okay.

Yes.

Yes.

Now,

I'm thinking during the fifth trimester, you know,

that's between the mother and her second cousin.

And the real doctor out, leave the rest of the family out.

What about the 73rd trimester?

That's between the mother, her favorite sous chef,

and her hairstylist.

So, okay.

Where is it?

Is it the 90th trimester where it's between the husband and the mechanic?

No, the husband's never involved.

But the mechanic could be

if it's a woman.

If it's a woman.

Okay, so it's between a woman and her female mechanic, but we can't identify the female because we don't know what a female is.

Yeah, well, that's that's

important.

We don't know.

Unless

if you're a biologist and you can't identify the gender of the mechanic,

you bring the biologist in on it as well.

But what if you're a biologist so you can identify a woman, but you don't know what a mechanic is?

Because you'd have to be a biologist mechanic

to be able to identify one.

Right.

So it gets very dicey as time goes on.

It does.

By the time the kid's 26, it's almost impossible.

To avoid it.

Yeah.

But, I mean, you still could,

but you'd have to figure out the whole choice.

Right.

Yeah, it's a mechanic's right to choose at that point.

Right.

Right.

Okay.

Good.

So, could I just ask, when did all could you read the first part of the first three months again?

Yeah.

Roe v.

Wade cut in a place where the vast majority of religions have reached an agreement.

Historically, the first three months or thereabouts in all major religions was that's between a woman and her doctor.

Now, can I ask when they held this meeting?

The major religions?

All major religions get together to agree.

That was Vatican 9, I think.

Who was Vatican 9?

Where

they didn't just decide Catholic doctrine, but they invited all other religions in and

sat down.

And they couldn't come to an agreement.

So they said, you know what?

Let's leave this to a woman and her doctor in this case.

Okay.

Yeah.

All right.

Okay.

That's weird because usually they would say, and a priest.

Yes.

But they don't have female priests, so you can't include them.

So, okay, so I don't remember Vatican 9,

but historically,

I think where churches fell was

the first three months

is the time before the quickening.

And when you tell the heart that you couldn't be charged,

well, no, it wasn't.

The quickening was when the woman first said the baby moved.

That was the that's what the quickening was.

That was the time that someone back historically could, I mean, I know, you know, in caveman days, all the churches agreed on an ultrasound.

But when the quickening happened, the baby moved, then the woman or somebody who, let's say, you know, beat her up or pushed her down the stairs or whatever would be held for murder after the quickening.

Before that, you didn't have verification.

So

that, that, that, I hate to bring that up to Joe Biden because he is such a good Catholic.

Oh, you know, man.

Yeah.

He is.

He goes to Mass every day.

That's how Catholic he is.

Every

day.

Wow.

Yeah.

And it's weird because his son goes to hookers like three times a day.

Yeah.

Every day.

And

that's

wow.

He's pretty devoted.

He's pretty worshiping.

Yeah.

He's pretty devoted.

To hookers?

Uh-huh.

Yes.

Yeah.

Yeah.

He's very devoted to the hookers.

Or anybody, really, that he's sniffing cocaine off off the belly of.

He's devoted to any of those people.

Right.

Could be anybody.

Yeah.

Could be Buddhist because all religions could be involved in that.

Right.

Well, that's good.

I'm glad we got that bit of information from Joe Biden.

Did you see him yesterday kind of waddle to the door in

in the White House?

He was making a statement about a

Yeah, he was making a statement about affirmative action.

He's in the White House and he slowly walks away from the podium and then stands there at the door.

I mean,

I've seen

more intelligence in my dog when he's standing at the door going, I gotta go outside.

At least there's something behind those eyes.

Watch this.

Is this a rogue report?

I don't know.

I don't know.

Not normal.

And then I need my pudding.

Wow.

It's nummy time.

And then nighttime.

And

the president brings my pills in every day.

Nice nice.

Mr.

President.

You are the president.

You are the president.

No, it's a nice black woman that comes in and she gives me my nummies.

So

that's great.

Then he was on MSNBC and after the interview, he just decided to get up.

Yeah, even before the interview ended, this is fun.

Mr.

President, thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you very much.

Great talk.

Thank you.

Don't go anywhere.

It's a very exciting day around here.

He's just.

It's embarrassing.

It's embarrassing me.

Well, you know, at this point, at least we can laugh about it.

I mean, because we would be crying

if we weren't laughing about it.

But

I mean, are these warning signs?

Good for entertainment purposes.

Are these warning signs to

any Democrats?

Is anybody concerned on the left about the shape this guy is in?

You know, we see this stuff every day and we comment on it, but it seems like everybody else on the left is ignoring it.

You do

have to tell you.

The left.

Yeah, the left is different than the average Democrat, I think.

The average Democrat, the one that just is our neighbor, I think they're just as concerned about it as we are.

And they think the same thing that we do.

Kamala Harris.

Yeah.

No.

That is the problem.

Stay in.

Just stay alive, Joe.

Just stay alive.

That's the best insurance policy I've ever seen.

I think that's why he picked her.

Yeah.

Yeah.

So you'd be really

America.

I don't know.

You want her?

No.

No.

Nope.

I'm with you, Joe.

I'm with you.

Some breaking news, Glenn.

The Supreme Court has made a decision

about the web designer who designs

things for weddings and whatnot.

And so the gay couple went to him.

He didn't want to do it.

And they just ruled in his favor.

Is that amazing?

In the web designers?

Yes.

Oh, thank God.

Let me read you the first paragraph from the AP in a defeat for gay rights.

Is it though, is it really a defeat for gay rights?

This is a victory for the rights of all citizens.

Everybody.

Yes, we're up to the city.

First of all, can I just ask,

if I were going to have a wedding and somebody said, I hate Glenn Beck, and there are lots of those people, I hate Glenn Beck.

I'm not making a cake for Glenn Beck's wedding.

I wouldn't want the guy to make my cake.

I'm sorry to be sexist or the woman, but then if I would have said woman, why would you say woman?

Because she's in the kitchen all the time, so there's no way to win.

But I don't,

I mean, I wouldn't want them.

Why

other than making a point?

You know, the poor cake master guy in Colorado?

Yeah.

He's going back to the Supreme Court.

That guy has spent 15

years of his life battling this.

It's insane.

And who knows how many hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars

have been involved there, too.

In one of these cases,

they lost their shop.

They had to do something else.

They lost their home.

But

this particular ruling, the Supreme Court's conservative majority ruled today that a Christian graphic artist who wants to design wedding websites can refuse to work with same-sex couples.

Court ruled six to three for designer Lori Smith, despite a Colorado law that bars discrimination based on sexual orientation, race, gender, and other characteristics.

Smith had argued that the law violates her free speech rights.

Absolutely, it did.

Smith's opponents warned that a win for her would allow a range of businesses to discriminate, refusing to serve black, Jewish, or Muslim customers.

Nonsense.

Interracial.

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.

First of all, first of all,

if there is a restaurant, I mean, and there were restaurants in,

there was the

Coffee Cup Cafe in some place in Texas, and each word was spelled with a K.

Very subtle.

And it was very uncomfortable, and everything was made to be uncomfortable for blacks.

You know what?

If that's what they want to do, I want to make sure I know what business that is.

And people just won't go.

Right.

And, you know, you want to be racist, be racist.

But, you know, I ain't going to your place and I don't know anybody who does.

And anybody who is sitting and I'm driving by and I see you were having coffee at the KKK place.

I know who you are now as well.

Yeah.

Let the free market sort it all out.

Hopefully that business would go out of business.

But they write, Neil Gorsuch wrote, the First Amendment envisions the United States as a rich and complex place where all persons are free to think and speak as they wish, not as the government demands.

The

dissent was written by Sonia Sotomayor.

Today, the court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class.

No, that's not true.

No.

Wait a minute.

It's not true.

That they are not saying, at least in the cake thing,

you can't,

I won't make a cake for you.

Right.

I won't make a wedding cake for you.

She's not saying, I won't take pictures for you.

I won't take pictures of your wedding for you.

You cannot compel speech.

That is the thing that makes us America.

And everybody misunderstands the Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights is only written down because

sometimes it's tough.

Sometimes people are saying things that you don't like.

People say things I don't like all the time.

I get over it or I debate them.

You know, it's not less speech.

It's more speech.

That's why we have the Bill of Rights.

You don't ever have to go to court to protect, I love pudding.

I mean,

in the case of Bill Cosby, but I think that was a little different.

You don't have to protect things that aren't controversial, that aren't tough.

You don't need the Bill of Rights for those things.

You need the Bill of Rights for that lone individual that says things that you hate.

Today in St.

George, there is, they've shipped in a bunch of people, bust them in from all over the West, to do a trans

show in one of the parks here and there's a big um

there's a big counter protest that is planned why

why

these people are not part of the community they're being bused in for a reason they want to stir up trouble they want to get all kinds of press for it

Why waste your time going down there?

They're not from your community.

Let them come in, do their thing and go, gee, I thought that would end differently.

And move on to another community where hopefully they'll be ignored there as well.

Or if they're in their own community where it's accepted, okay.

Right.

We are

we are we're missing

the point here of the Bill of Rights and the right of people to do and say outrageous things.

We don't have to like it.

In fact, that's the point.

There's going to be a lot of things that people say that we don't like.

We must stand up for those people when they're saying things we hate.

Otherwise, we shouldn't expect it to happen when we're the ones saying things that other people don't agree with.

This is the best of the Glenbeck program.

Tammy Nichols.

She is an Idaho state senator.

Tammy, how are you?

I am well.

Thank you for having me on, Glenn.

You're welcome.

How did this bill come about and what does it mean?

Well, you know, in Idaho, we've had

our fair share of things that have happened in our state going back to the Ruby Ridge siege with the Weavers back in the early 90s and

in my district district 10 we have very engaged people here that are involved in the Republican Party involved in the conservative movement and we've just seen the things that have been transpiring across the nation in our state in regards to the weaponization of government and more specifically the FBI so several of my constituents here got together and put together this resolution to present at our summer meeting for the state GOP.

We weren't sure how far it would get.

We weren't sure if it would get any pushback, but it actually sailed right through.

We had some really good resolutions that actually passed this last summer meeting.

But this was one of them, and this is one that has really picked up steam in the media because it is so straightforward and it really hits on the issues that are transpiring in our government.

Okay, so before we get into the resolution and what has to happen and what it means,

tell people

in abbreviated form as much as you can, what happened with Ruby Ridge.

Most Americans think of Ruby Ridge and they think

because that's how it was sold to the American people.

Oh, it's some gunnut up in the woods.

Tell us what happened.

Ruby Ridge.

Well, basically, and I was really young when it actually transpired, but I remember watching the news on what was going on.

And you're even thinking back then, you know, why is this happening?

You know,

you had an issue with

a sawed-off shotgun, and

the weavers went up to their cabin, just wanted to be left alone, basically, and

started being surveilled by the FBI.

There was

issues going on.

They wanted him, Randy Weaver to turn himself in,

and there ended up being a standoff.

And Tammy, if I'm not mistaken, the saw-off shotgun was

entrapment.

It was the FBI agent trying to get him to saw off this shotgun for him.

He sawed it off in a legal way, and then the FBI agent said, no, can you add another quarter inch or something like that?

He did

and then tried to arrest him, right?

Right.

It was used

as a tool to, yes, as an entrapment.

And so the standoff ensued, and

the wife of Randy Weaver ended up getting shot.

There was a bunch of things that transpired, but there was a standoff that took place, and people died, and

it never needed to happen.

That did not need to transpire the way that it did.

And we see that happening in different areas.

Right.

And if I remember right, it did go to court, and the FBI was excoriated, I believe,

in the verdict.

And we never seemed to learn the lesson.

The FBI never seems to learn the lesson.

And it happens over and over and over again.

And it's getting much worse.

Correct.

Well, and in this resolution, we put in, there's several examples that are put in.

I mean, you have the Ruby Ridge, you have the Waco, Texas, you have different programs that the FBI have put together, like Cointel Pro

that transpired.

And we're going back, you know, to the early 50s.

So this has been going on for a long time.

And then we have more recent things that have transpired, such as parents speaking out at the school board meetings that have been put under surveillance.

So there's all these issues that are continuing.

And you're right.

Our government doesn't seem to learn the lesson.

I was just back in D.C.

just a couple of months ago with another organization to talk to Jim Jordan's committee and those that are on it about what's transpiring with the weaponization of government, how NGOs are being utilized to put people on lists, and that the government is utilizing those lists, and people don't even know they're on that.

And then we have the FBI with what they've been doing with the surveillance, with what's happened with parents that are speaking out at the school board meetings, what's happened with President Trump.

And so we have all these things that are transpiring where we just have an entity that is out of control, government overreach, and not staying within their jurisdiction of the Constitution.

We're talking to Idaho State Senator Tammy Nichols about a GOP resolution that has just passed condemning the FBI and calling for its abolition.

So it it moves from the GOP.

Will it actually become a resolution

that you think can pass?

Yeah, well, you know, as a senator, you know, my desire and how it should work is that the things that are passed at the state party GOP meetings should translate over to the legislative session.

And like in this last one, we had 26 different resolutions that passed.

So now those 26 should come over through the legislative process into actual pieces of legislation or legislative resolutions.

So what we're hoping transpires with this, and I'm a co-chair of the Idaho Freedom Caucus, and my members are very excited about this sort of pieces of legislation that could come into play.

So what we're hoping to get out of this is that we would like to see other states also run similar resolutions at their state party level.

And then also, you know, because we say in this resolution that if the FBI cannot be reformed, then we do support an abolition of this government agency.

So we're kind of trying to give that incentive first that, you know, to reform, but we don't have a very good track record that that's transpired with this so the next step is to call for the abolition

so how is the state going to pressure I mean what what do you have

to use as leverage to get them to reform

well first this resolution is going to be sent to our

senators and our congressmen in DC.

So we want them to know that this is something that the state, GOP as a whole, is wanting to see transpire.

And we're going to be looking to them, of course, to help try to lead that or to start putting the pressure on the federal government to rein in the FBI.

If that is not the case, then the states have sovereignty.

The states can exercise their sovereignty.

And we see that happening in all sorts of other forms where states

do things that

the federal government may not like or you know like with drugs or with illegal immigration or any of that sort of stuff that the states exercise their sovereignty and that's really what we're getting to now we the federal government is not doing their job the states are the ones that give the the power the control to the federal government And so the states need to start exercising their sovereignty and saying, we are not participating in this anymore.

They're not welcome in the state.

If the FBI comes to the state, then our sheriffs, our constitutional sheriffs, need to exercise their authority.

But

we need to put our federal government, our congressmen, and our senators on notice that this is what we want to see transpire.

And if it does not happen, the states need to start exercising their sovereignty to say, we're not participating in this anymore, or

we are going to regain our control and our authority to say enough is enough.

and do that through legislation.

I have to tell you, I think this is the bravest legislation in any state that I have seen yet.

I mean,

this is powerful.

How much pushback are you getting from the people in the state?

And

are you worried about federal pushback at all?

You know, so far we haven't received a lot of pushback in our state.

Again, this is a resolution that we weren't even sure how far it was going to get.

And it wasn't one that we thought was going to actually get a lot of attention.

But the more it's it's getting out there, I've had actually people from different parts of the country contacting me because of things that have happened to them and their their

situations that they've had dealing with the FBI.

So that's been very interesting to me to see the people actually become aware of what's transpiring and that we actually ran this.

And so yeah, I'm hoping, I mean, we might get pushed back on the federal federal level, but so be it, because we have an out-of-control agency that is acting

outside of the Constitution, outside of their authority.

And

we have to retain that.

We have to get that back under control.

So, so be it.

I hope that you have enough people

in the legislature that

have clean lives because that's the way the FBI has gotten away with it for so long.

They'll gather information on people, this is what Hoover did, and then use it against them and

blackmail them into siding with them.

So I hope you have enough in the legislature that

fear their God more than they fear the United States,

the

FBI.

Yeah, you know,

and we know that there are tools that are utilized to get people to do things.

And again, that's why we put the examples that are in this resolution so that people are aware that these are the things that have transpired in the past.

These are the things that have transpired recently and that we have a problem that we need to get back under control.

Tammy Nichols, the Idaho state senator,

a part of the Freedom Caucus in Idaho.

Thanks for being on.

And I am a proud resident of the state, part-time, but I'm a proud resident and landowner in Idaho.

And I'm counting on you guys keeping it free.

Thank you so much.

Thank you.

At blinds.com, it's not just about window treatments.

It's about you, your style, your space, your way.

Whether you DIY or want the pros to handle it all, you'll have the confidence of knowing it's done right.

From free expert design help to our 100% satisfaction guarantee, everything we do is made to fit your life and your windows.

Because at blinds.com, the only thing we treat better than windows is you.

Visit blinds.com now for up to 50% off with minimum purchase plus a professional measure at no cost.

Rules and restrictions apply.